| Literature DB >> 28168119 |
Steven H Ferguson1, Brent G Young2, David J Yurkowski2, Randi Anderson3, Cornelia Willing4, Ole Nielsen5.
Abstract
To assess whether demographic declines of Arctic species at the southern limit of their range will be gradual or punctuated, we compared large-scale environmental patterns including sea ice dynamics to ringed seal (Pusa hispida) reproduction, body condition, recruitment, and stress in Hudson Bay from 2003 to 2013. Aerial surveys suggested a gradual decline in seal density from 1995 to 2013, with the lowest density occurring in 2013. Body condition decreased and stress (cortisol) increased over time in relation to longer open water periods. The 2010 open water period in Hudson Bay coincided with extremes in large-scale atmospheric patterns (North Atlantic Oscillation, Arctic Oscillation, El Nino-Southern Oscillation) resulting in the earliest spring breakup and the latest ice formation on record. The warming event was coincident with high stress level, low ovulation rate, low pregnancy rate, few pups in the Inuit harvest, and observations of sick seals. Results provide evidence of changes in the condition of Arctic marine mammals in relation to climate mediated sea ice dynamics. We conclude that although negative demographic responses of Hudson Bay seals are occurring gradually with diminishing sea ice, a recent episodic environmental event played a significant role in a punctuated population decline.Entities:
Keywords: Abundance; Body condition; Disease; Hudson Bay; NAO; Polar bears; Pusa hispida; Reproduction; Sea ice; Stress
Year: 2017 PMID: 28168119 PMCID: PMC5292026 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1(A) Annual winter (December to February) North Atlantic Oscillation index (NAO), Arctic Oscillation (AO), and El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), 1971–2014.
Note red arrows indicate possible regime shifts (1977, 1989, 1989/99, 2010) and black arrows possible years with poor ringed seal condition: 1973/74, 1983, 1992, 1998, 2010 (Smith & Stirling, 1978; Hare & Mantua, 2000; Smith & Harwood, 2001; Benson & Trites, 2002; Ferguson, Stirling & McLoughlin, 2005; Litzow, 2006). (B) Sea ice patterns over the day of the year showing inter-annual variation in timing of spring breakup, duration of open water season, and time of freeze-up, 2003–2013. Note that autumn 2010 freeze-up did not occur until January 2011.
Biological data from harvested ringed seals collected in Hudson Bay, Canada.
| Year | Body condition (% fat) | Ovulation (%) | Young of year (%) | RIA cortisol (ng/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 39.1 (115) | 0.07 ± 0.01 (72) | ||
| 2004 | 55.4 ± 1.0 (45) | 30.4 (56) | 0.10 ± 0.02 (32) | |
| 2005 | 52.8 ± 0.9 (71) | 40.9 (88) | 0.10 ± 0.01 (120) | |
| 2006 | 49.7 ± 0.7 (80) | 42.7 (82) | 0.14 ± 0.05 (40) | |
| 2007 | 46.9 ± 0.6 (123) | 85.7 (7) | 52.4 (126) | 0.32 ± 0.10 (27) |
| 2008 | 47.5 ± 0.8 (102) | 100.0 (5) | 48.6 (105) | 0.24 ± 0.04 (56) |
| 2009 | 45.2 ± 1.2 (41) | 88.9 (9) | 38.1 (42) | 0.28 ± 0.04 (51) |
| 2010 | 43.9 ± 0.9 (90) | 66.7 (18) | 28.1 (96) | 0.86 ± 0.27 (46) |
| 2011 | 46.4 ± 0.8 (97) | 56.3 (16) | 20.6 (97) | 0.51 ± 0.12 (30) |
| 2012 | 40.3 ± 1.2 (65) | 83.3 (12) | 10.8 (65) | 0.43 ± 0.07 (34) |
| 2013 | 48.1 ± 1.4 (42) | 100.0 (6) | 20.0 (45) |
Note:
Mean ± standard error (sample size).
Figure 2Barplots (A and B) of annual ovulation rates (%) from adult female ringed seals and annual percentage of pups in the harvest (Table 1).
Linear regressions between seal body condition and harvest year (C; slope = −0.01, t = −8.2, p < 0.001), and cortisol level and harvest year (D; slope = 0.02, t = 8.0, p < 0.001).
Relationships between Hudson Bay ringed seal biological parameters and environmental correlates assessed using general linear models, 2003–2013.
| Covariates | Ovulation rate (%) | Pup recruitment (%) | Seal condition (blubber %) | Cortisol (ng/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −48.00 ± 69.51 | 41.96 ± 39.1 | 25.20 ± 2.58 | −34.90 ± 43.48 |
| Year | 0.02 ± 0.03 | −0.021 ± 0.020 | −0.012 ± 0.001 | 0.002 ± 0.0002 |
| Ice-free period (days) | 0.0003 ± 0.006 | −0.00036 ± 0.0033 | −0.0003 ± 0.0002 | 0.00003 ± 0.0005 |
| El-Niño Southern Oscillation | 0.004 ± 0.01 | 0.0175 ± 0.072 | −0.008 ± 0.004 | 0.001 ± 0.006 |
| North Atlantic Oscillation | 0.011 ± 0.012 | 0.00719 ± 0.072 | −0.009 ± 0.004 | −0.02 ± 0.007 |
Notes:
R2 was 0.40 for ovulation rate model, 0.19 for pup recruitment model, 0.12 for body condition model, and 0.21 for cortisol level model.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001.
0.08.
0.055.
Figure 3Linear regressions between ringed seal body condition and ice-free duration (A; slope = −0.0004, t = −2.0, p < 0.05), body condition and El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) index (B; slope = −0.009, t = −2.32, p = 0.02), body condition and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index (C; slope = −0.009, t = 2.0, p < 0.05), and cortisol and NAO index (D; slope = −0.02, t = 2.6, p = 0.01).