Literature DB >> 21058549

Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis.

Christine M Hunter1, Hal Caswell, Michael C Runge, Eric V Regehr, Steve C Amstrup, Ian Stirling.   

Abstract

The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) depends on sea ice for feeding, breeding, and movement. Significant reductions in Arctic sea ice are forecast to continue because of climate warming. We evaluated the impacts of climate change on polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea by means of a demographic analysis, combining deterministic, stochastic, environment-dependent matrix population models with forecasts of future sea ice conditions from IPCC general circulation models (GCMs). The matrix population models classified individuals by age and breeding status; mothers and dependent cubs were treated as units. Parameter estimates were obtained from a capture-recapture study conducted from 2001 to 2006. Candidate statistical models allowed vital rates to vary with time and as functions of a sea ice covariate. Model averaging was used to produce the vital rate estimates, and a parametric bootstrap procedure was used to quantify model selection and parameter estimation uncertainty. Deterministic models projected population growth in years with more extensive ice coverage (2001-2003) and population decline in years with less ice coverage (2004-2005). LTRE (life table response experiment) analysis showed that the reduction in lambda in years with low sea ice was due primarily to reduced adult female survival, and secondarily to reduced breeding. A stochastic model with two environmental states, good and poor sea ice conditions, projected a declining stochastic growth rate, log lambdas, as the frequency of poor ice years increased. The observed frequency of poor ice years since 1979 would imply log lambdas approximately - 0.01, which agrees with available (albeit crude) observations of population size. The stochastic model was linked to a set of 10 GCMs compiled by the IPCC; the models were chosen for their ability to reproduce historical observations of sea ice and were forced with "business as usual" (A1B) greenhouse gas emissions. The resulting stochastic population projections showed drastic declines in the polar bear population by the end of the 21st century. These projections were instrumental in the decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21058549     DOI: 10.1890/09-1641.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  34 in total

1.  Disentangling effects of uncertainties on population projections: climate change impact on an epixylic bryophyte.

Authors:  Alejandro Ruete; Wei Yang; Lars Bärring; Nils Chr Stenseth; Tord Snäll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate change: The prospects for polar bears.

Authors:  Andrew E Derocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Climate change, phenological shifts, eco-evolutionary responses and population viability: toward a unifying predictive approach.

Authors:  Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Polar and brown bear genomes reveal ancient admixture and demographic footprints of past climate change.

Authors:  Webb Miller; Stephan C Schuster; Andreanna J Welch; Aakrosh Ratan; Oscar C Bedoya-Reina; Fangqing Zhao; Hie Lim Kim; Richard C Burhans; Daniela I Drautz; Nicola E Wittekindt; Lynn P Tomsho; Enrique Ibarra-Laclette; Luis Herrera-Estrella; Elizabeth Peacock; Sean Farley; George K Sage; Karyn Rode; Martyn Obbard; Rafael Montiel; Lutz Bachmann; Olafur Ingólfsson; Jon Aars; Thomas Mailund; Oystein Wiig; Sandra L Talbot; Charlotte Lindqvist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Greenhouse gas mitigation can reduce sea-ice loss and increase polar bear persistence.

Authors:  Steven C Amstrup; Eric T Deweaver; David C Douglas; Bruce G Marcot; George M Durner; Cecilia M Bitz; David A Bailey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  A Review of Infectious Agents in Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) and Their Long-Term Ecological Relevance.

Authors:  Anna C Fagre; Kelly A Patyk; Pauline Nol; Todd Atwood; Karsten Hueffer; Colleen Duncan
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 7.  Adaptation of mammalian host-pathogen interactions in a changing arctic environment.

Authors:  Karsten Hueffer; Todd M O'Hara; Erich H Follmann
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  A demographic approach to study effects of climate change in desert plants.

Authors:  Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Wolfgang Siewert; Brenda B Casper; Katja Tielbörger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Recent range expansion of a terrestrial orchid corresponds with climate-driven variation in its population dynamics.

Authors:  Sascha van der Meer; Hans Jacquemyn; Peter D Carey; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Beyond the Mean: Sensitivities of the Variance of Population Growth.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Siddharth Krishna-Kumar; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 7.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.