| Literature DB >> 28168106 |
Ruben Gil-Solsona1, Jaime Nácher-Mestre2, Leticia Lacalle-Bergeron1, Juan Vicente Sancho1, Josep Alvar Calduch-Giner3, Félix Hernández1, Jaume Pérez-Sánchez3.
Abstract
A metabolomic study has been performed to identify sensitive and robust biomarkers of malnutrition in farmed fish, using gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) as a model. The metabolomic fingerprinting of serum from fasted fish was assessed by means of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. More than 15,000 different m/z ions were detected and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant analysis allowed a clear differentiation between the two experimental groups (fed and 10-day fasted fish) with more than 90% of total variance explained by the two first components. The most significant metabolites (up to 45) were elucidated on the basis of their tandem mass spectra with a broad representation of amino acids, oligopeptides, urea cycle metabolites, L-carnitine-related metabolites, glutathione-related metabolites, fatty acids, lysophosphatidic acids, phosphatidylcholines as well as biotin- and noradrenaline-related metabolites. This untargeted approach highlighted important adaptive responses in energy and oxidative metabolism, contributing to identify robust and nutritionally-regulated biomarkers of health and metabolic condition that will serve to assess the welfare status of farmed fish.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture; Chromatography; Gilthead sea bream; Mass spectrometry; Nutrition; Serum metabolomics
Year: 2017 PMID: 28168106 PMCID: PMC5291114 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1General metabolomics workflow from data acquisition by LC-MS to functional analysis.
Biometry of fed (control) and fasted gilthead sea bream.
| Control | Fasted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 426.5 ± 14.1 | 361.6 ± 10.7 | 0.002 |
| Length (cm) | 24.5 ± 0.3 | 24.0 ± 0.2 | 0.196 |
| Condition factor | 2.91 ± 0.06 | 2.63 ± 0.07 | 0.008 |
| Liver weight (g) | 5.63 ± 0.33 | 3.24 ± 0.16 | 4E−6 |
| Mesenteric fat (g) | 7.20 ± 1.08 | 6.01 ± 0.89 | 0.408 |
| HSI (%) | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 1E−6 |
| MSI (%) | 1.90 ± 0.21 | 1.64 ± 0.23 | 0.394 |
Notes.
Hepatosomatic index = (100 × liver weight)/body weight.
Mesenteric fat index = (100 × mesenteric fat)/body weight.
Figure 2PLS-DA score plots of acquired data of fasted (red) and control (black) fish.
X-axis corresponds to first component and Y-axis to second component (A) RP at positive ionization mode (B) RP at negative ionization mode (C) HILIC at positive ionization mode (D) HILIC in negative ionization mode.
Compound list obtained from untargeted approach and refining process.
| Compound name | Biological process | Chromatography/ ionization mode | Formula | De/protonated molecule | RT (min) | Change (%) from CTRL | Corrected | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Octanoyl-L-carnitine | 1, 2 | RP/+ | C15H29NO4 | 288.2158 (−1.8) | 10.38 | 373% | 3.1E–06 |
| 2 | Decanoyl-L-carnitine | 1, 2 | RP/+ | C17H33NO4 | 316.2478 (−1.0) | 12.58 | 492% | 4.53E–07 |
| 3 | Hexadecenedioic acid mono-L-carnitine ester | 1, 2 | RP/+ | C23H43NO6 | 430.3157 (−1.2) | 13.28 | 373% | 1.15E–06 |
| 4 | Tetradecadien-L-carnitine | 1, 2 | RP/+ | C21H37NO4 | 368.2784 (−1.7) | 8.90 | 373% | 1.25E–05 |
| 5 | Tetradecenoyl-L-carnitine | 1, 2 | RP/+ | C21H39NO4 | 370.2947 (−1.0) | 14.88 | 373% | 9.98E–06 |
| 6 | L-ornithine | 3, 4 | RP/+ | C5H12N2O2 | 133.0972 (−0.5) | 5.29 | 1213% | 1.26E–10 |
| 7 | Citrulline | 3, 4 | HI/+ | C6H13N3O3 | 176.1029 (−0.6) | 5.30 | 140% | 5.02E–03 |
| 8 | Argininosuccinate | 3, 4 | HI/− | C10H18N4O6 | 289.1145 (−0.3) | 1.31 | 248% | 2.07E–02 |
| 9 | Norvaline | 3, 4 | RP/− | C5H11NO2 | 116.0711 (−0.1) | 2.51 | 29% | 5.54E–08 |
| 10 | L- Arginine | 3, 4 | HI/+ | C6H14N4O2 | 175.1194 (−0.1) | 6.14 | 128% | 3.37E–02 |
| 11 | N-(2-cyanoethyl)glycine | 3 | HI/+ | C5H8N2O2 | 129.0673 (+0.9) | 5.25 | 246% | 6.05E–09 |
| 12 | Isoleucine | 3 | RP/− | C6H13NO2 | 130.0880 (+1.4) | 1.61 | 230% | 1.15E–06 |
| 13 | Glutamine | 3 | HI/+ | C5H10N2O3 | 147.0766 (−0.4) | 5.15 | 214% | 1.80E–05 |
| 14 | Glu-Phe | 3 | RP/+ | C14H18N2O5 | 295.1278 (−1.6) | 4.61 | 23% | 9.11E–07 |
| 15 | His-Phe | 3 | RP/+ | C15H18N4O3 | 303.1447 (−1.0) | 2.08 | 50% | 6.53E–05 |
| 16 | LTYV | 3 | RP/− | C24H38N4O7 | 493.2652 (−1.0) | 5.80 | 23% | 9.98E–06 |
| 17 | LLGGPS | 3 | RP/+ | C24H42N6O8 | 543.3148 (+0.6) | 6.48 | 214% | 2.53E–05 |
| 18 | QLWD | 3 | RP/+ | C26H36N6O8 | 561.2688 (+1.5) | 8.08 | 373% | 4.58E–04 |
| 19 | YLWV | 3 | RP/+ | C24H38N4O7 | 495.2807 (−1.2) | 8.10 | 283% | 2.77E–04 |
| 20 | SVLGPA | 3 | RP/+ | C24H42N6O8 | 543.3141 (−0.1) | 14.75 | 746% | 2.87E–07 |
| 21 | N(2-Furoyl)glycyl-leucine | 3 | RP/− | C13H20N2O5 | 283.1301 (+0.7) | 5.15 | 303% | 3.44E–09 |
| 22 | MOPEG sulphate | 5 | RP/− | C9H12O7S | 263.0223 (−0.2) | 2.01 | 325% | 9.70E–07 |
| 23 | Noradrenaline | 5 | HI/+ | C8H11NO3 | 170.0806 (−1.1) | 3.02 | 141% | 9.34E–03 |
| 24 | DOPEGAL | 5 | HI/+ | C8H8O4 | 169.0501 (0.0) | 3.11 | 229% | 3.94E–07 |
| 25 | DOPEG | 5 | HI/+ | C8H10O4 | 171.0649 (−0.8) | 2.55 | 108% | 1.94E–01 |
| 26 | ϒ-Glu-Leu | 6 | HI/+ | C11H20N2O5 | 261.1432 (−1.8) | 3.37 | 246% | 3.13E–06 |
| 27 | ϒ-Glu-Val | 6 | RP/+ | C10H18N2O5 | 247.1285 (−0.9) | 2.15 | 246% | 1.05E–08 |
| 28 | ϒ-Glu-Ile | 6 | HI/+ | C11H20N2O5 | 261.1446 (−0.4) | 3.12 | 696% | 1.48E–08 |
| 29 | Pyroglutamic acid | 6 | HI/+ | C5H7NO3 | 130.0521 (−1.7) | 5.15 | 303% | 4.26E–06 |
| 30 | Glutathione | 6 | HI/− | C10H17N3O6S | 306.0760 (0.0) | 1.37 | 66% | 3.03E–02 |
| 31 | 6 | HI/+ | C8H14N2O5S | 251.0701 (−0.1) | 4.92 | 63% | 4.22E–01 | |
| 32 | Methionine sulfoxide | 6 | HI/+ | C5H11NO3S | 166.0511 (−0.2) | 4.96 | 41% | 2.08E–04 |
| 33 | FFA (C18:3) | 1, 2 | RP/− | C18H30O2 | 277.2172 (−0.4) | 15.41 | 246% | 2.08E–04 |
| 34 | 9-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid | 1, 2 | RP/− | C18H36O3 | 299.2598 (+1.3) | 14.98 | 528% | 2.23E–07 |
| 35 | Linoleic acid | 1, 2 | RP/− | C20H34O2 | 305.2500 (+1.9) | 16.31 | 19% | 3.43E–06 |
| 36 | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 1, 2 | RP/− | C20H30O2 | 301.2152 (−1.6) | 15.10 | 33% | 2.01E–03 |
| 37 | Acetohexadecyloxy propylaminoethyl phosphate | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C23H48NO7P | 482.3250 (+0.3) | 14.93 | 35% | 2.53E–06 |
| 38 | LysoPC(14:0) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C22H46NO7P | 468.3083 (−0.7) | 15.41 | 25% | 9.29E–05 |
| 39 | LysoPC(16:1) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C24H48NO7P | 494.3244 (−0.3) | 14.91 | 44% | 1.71E–04 |
| 40 | LysoPC(18:4) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C26H46NO7P | 516.3079 (−1.1) | 14.36 | 11% | 1.40E–08 |
| 41 | LysoPC(18:3) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C26H48NO7P | 518.3247 (0.0) | 14.38 | 4% | 1.93E–11 |
| 42 | LysoPC(20:5) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C28H48NO7P | 542.3248 (+0.1) | 14.58 | 13% | 1.37E–08 |
| 43 | LysoPC(18:1) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C26H52NO7P | 522.3560 (0.0) | 15.00 | 16% | 8.10E–08 |
| 44 | LysoPC(21:5) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C29H50NO7P | 556.3408 (+0.5) | 14.88 | 31% | 9.98E–06 |
| 45 | LysoPC(20:4) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C28H50NO7P | 544.3411 (+0.8) | 14.06 | 20% | 7.01E–06 |
| 46 | LysoPC (Tetradecylthioacetic acid) | 1, 7 | RP/+ | C24H48NO7PS | 526.2951 (−1.6) | 15.13 | 1% | 1.62E–09 |
| 47 | PC(22:5/20:5) | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C50H80NO8P | 854.5689 (−1.1) | 4.11 | 27% | 3.01E–08 |
| 48 | PC(20:5/18:1) | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C46H78NO8P | 804.5435 (−0.8) | 6.78 | 200% | 1.95E–02 |
| 49 | PC(20:4/18:1) | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C46H82NO8P | 808.5843 (−1.3) | 5.73 | 214% | 4.69E–02 |
| 50 | PC(18:1/16:0) | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C42H82NO8P | 760.5847 (−0.9) | 4.06 | 303% | 1.79E–05 |
| 51 | TMAO | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C3H9NO | 76.0760 (−0.2) | 5.85 | 41% | 7.68E–05 |
| 52 | Glycerophos phocholine | 1, 7 | HI/+ | C8H20NO6P | 258.1106 (0.0) | 5.73 | 12% | 5.69E–05 |
| 53 | Hydroxyisovaleric acid | 8 | RP/− | C5H10O3 | 117.0553 (+0.1) | 2.85 | 373% | 2.41E–09 |
| 54 | Biotin | 8 | RP/+ | C10H16N2O3S | 245.0959 (−0.1) | 5.40 | 80% | 2.46E–01 |
Notes.
1, Lipid metabolism; 2, Fatty acid metabolism; 3, Protein metabolism; 4, Amino catabolism/urea-cycle; 5, Stress response/catecholamine metabolism; 6, Oxidative stress/glutathione metabolism; 7, Phospholipid metabolism; 8, Vitamin metabolism.
Chromatography and ionization modes in which the signal area was higher for the highlighted compound.
Variation of area between fed and fasted fish. Variation > 100% means higher area in fasted fish, and <100% means lower are in fasted fish.
ANOVA followed by Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing correction.
Compounds obtained in refining process.
Figure 3Meister’s cycle.
In red, elucidated metabolites up-regulated with fasting; in green, down-regulated with fasting. Asterisks mark elucidated metabolites by means of the refining step.
Figure 4Corollary with the metabolic significance of highlighted metabolites.
Red and green circles signals the degree of up- and down-regulation of metabolites, respectively, with fasting.