| Literature DB >> 28167958 |
Hao Wu1, Liang Sun2, Dao-Po Lin2, Xiao-Xiao Shao2, Sheng-Long Xia2, Ming Lv3.
Abstract
Aims. Fucosyltransferase 2 (FUT2) gene potentially affects the constituent of intestinal microbiota, which play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study investigated the association of FUT2 gene polymorphisms with IBD in southeast China. Methods. We collected 671 IBD patients and 502 healthy controls. FUT2 gene polymorphisms (C357T, A385T, and G428A) were determined by SNaPshot. Frequencies of the FUT2 genotypes, alleles, and haplotype between groups were compared by χ2 test. Results. The allele and genotype frequencies of FUT2 did not differ between ulcerative colitis patients and controls (all P > 0.05). However, mutant allele and genotype of FUT2 (A385T) were significantly increased in Crohn's disease (CD) patients (P = 0.024, OR = 1.271, and 95% CI = 1.031-1.565; P < 0.001, OR = 1.927, and 95% CI = 1.353-2.747, resp.). The same conclusion was drawn from FUT2 (G428A) (P = 0.023, OR = 3.324, and 95% CI = 1.108-9.968; P = 0.044, OR = 1.116-10.137, and 95% CI = 1.116-10.137, resp.). The haplotype TT formed with "C357T and A385T" was more prevalent in CD patients than in controls (P = 0.020, OR = 1.277, and 95% CI = 1.036-1.573). Besides, frequencies of mutant allele and genotype of FUT2 (A385T) were significantly lower in patients with ileocolonic CD than in those with colonic CD (P = 0.001 and 0.002, resp.) and ileal CD (P = 0.007 and 0.004, resp.). Conclusions. FUT2 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes were associated with the susceptibility to CD but not UC.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28167958 PMCID: PMC5266819 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4148651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Demographic characteristics of IBD patients and the controls.
| Characteristics | UC | CD | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number | 396 | 275 | 502 | |
| Sex (female/male) | 164/232 | 121/154 | 226/276 | 0.549 |
| Age (years) [mean (SD)] | 38.98 (16.01) | 36.23 (15.25) | 37.05 (14.99) | 0.051 |
| Age of onset (years) [mean (SD)] | 33.04 (13.81) | 31.20 (15.67) | 0.109 | |
| Smoker/nonsmoker | 69/327 | 56/219 | 82/420 | 0.376 |
UC, ulcerative colitis. CD, Crohn's disease. SD, standard deviation. P values were calculated by t-test or chi-squared test.
FUT2 gene polymorphisms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the controls.
|
| Controls | UC | CD | UC versus Controls | CD versus Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| C357T | |||||||
| TT | 379 | 292 | 217 | 1 | 1 | ||
| TC (additive model) | 112 | 91 | 57 | 1.055 (0.759–1.463) | 0.742 | 0.889 (0.608–1.291) | 0.521 |
| CC (additive model) | 11 | 13 | 1 | 1.534 (0.624–3.839) | 0.302 | 0.159 (0.004–0.996) | 0.045 |
| Dominant model (TC+CC versus TT) | 1.097 (0.811–1.485) | 0.547 | 0.824 (0.578–1.173) | 0.282 | |||
| Recessive model (CC versus TT+TC) | 1.515 (0.671–3.419) | 0.314 | 0.824 (0.578–1.173) | 0.282 | |||
| Allele frequency model (C allele versus T allele) | 1.125 (0.861–1.471) | 0.387 | 0.780 (0.563–1.080) | 0.134 | |||
| A385T | |||||||
| AA | 150 | 122 | 80 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AT (additive model) | 269 | 204 | 119 | 0.932 (0.691–1.259) | 0.648 | 0.829 (0.586–1.1773) | 0.290 |
| TT (additive model) | 83 | 70 | 76 | 1.037 (0.697–1.544) | 0.858 |
|
|
| Dominant model (AT+TT versus AA) | 0.957 (0.719–1.274) | 0.764 | 1.039 (0.752–1.435) | 0.818 | |||
| Recessive model (TT versus AA+AT) | 1.084 (0.764–1.537) | 0.651 |
|
| |||
| Allele frequency model (T allele versus A allele) | 1.004 (0.832–1.212) | 0.964 |
|
| |||
| G428A | |||||||
| GG | 497 | 392 | 266 | 1 |
| ||
| GA (additive model) | 5 | 4 | 9 | 1.014 (0.271–3.802) | 0.983 |
|
|
| AA (additive model) | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | ||
| Dominant model (GA+AA versus GG) | 1.014 (0.271–3.802) | 0.983 |
|
| |||
| Recessive model (AA versus GG+GA) | NA | NA | |||||
| Allele frequency model (A allele versus G allele) | 1.014 (0.271–3.789) | 1.000 |
|
| |||
P value, OR, and 95% CI were calculated by chi-squared test. Threshold of P value is 0.05. P values of statistical significance are in bold. NA, not calculated due to low frequencies. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. The first row of each comparison group was set as reference.
Haplotypes of FUT2 gene in patients with IBD and the controls.
| Haplotypes | TA | TT | CA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with UC (%) | 42 | 43 | 14 |
| Patients with CD (%) | 41 | 49# | 11 |
| Controls (%) | 44 | 43 | 13 |
# P value = 0.020, OR = 1.277, and 95% CI = 1.036–1.573.
Figure 1The linkage disequilibrium patterns of FUT2 gene in Han population from Southeast China. The number in a square represents D′ value for each of the two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Dark color of a square indicates that there is a strong connection between the two SNPs.
Association of FUT2 gene polymorphisms with the location of CD patients.
| FUT2 | Colonic | Ileocolonic | Ileal | Ileocolonic versus Colonic | Ileal versus Colonic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| ||||
| C357T | |||||||
| TT | 77 | 71 | 69 | 1 | 1 | ||
| TC (additive model) | 23 | 19 | 15 | 0.896 (0.450–1.782) | 0.754 | 0.728 (0.352–1.506) | 0.391 |
| CC (additive model) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.987 (0.963–1.012) | 1.000 | 0.987 (0.963–1.012) | 1.000 |
| Dominant model (TC+CC versus TT) | 0.859 (0.434–1.699) | 0.661 | 0.697 (0.339–1.436) | 0.327 | |||
| Recessive model (CC versus TT+TC) | 0.990 (0.970–1.010) | 1.000 | 0.990 (0.971–1.010) | 1.000 | |||
| Allele frequency model (C allele versus T allele) | 0.836 (0.443–1.574) | 0.578 | 0.694 (0.353–1.364) | 0.288 | |||
| A385T | |||||||
| AA | 17 | 33 | 30 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AT (additive model) | 48 | 39 | 32 |
|
|
|
|
| TT (additive model) | 36 | 18 | 22 |
|
|
|
|
| Dominant model (AT+TT versus AA) |
|
|
|
| |||
| Recessive model (TT versus AA+AT) |
|
| 0.641 (0.340–1.208) | 0.168 | |||
| Allele frequency model (T allele versus A allele) |
|
|
|
| |||
| G428A | |||||||
| GG | 98 | 86 | 82 | 1 | 1 | ||
| GA (additive model) | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1.519 (0.331–6.980) | 0.709 | 0.797 (0.130–4.884) | 1.000 |
| AA (additive model) | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | ||
| Dominant model (GA+AA versus GG) | 1.519 (0.331–6.980) | 0.709 | 0.797 (0.130–4.884) | 1.000 | |||
| Recessive model (AA versus GG+GA) | NA | NA | |||||
| Allele frequency model (A allele versus G allele) | 1.508 (0.333–6.829) | 0.711 | 0.799 (0.132–4.840) | 1.000 | |||
Conducted by using unconditional logistic regression analyses, colonic colitis was set as reference compared to ileocolonic colitis and ileal colitis. Variables also included sex, age of onset, and behavior of disease. The first row of each comparison group was set as reference.