Literature DB >> 28167614

Tuning Chromosomal Instability to Optimize Tumor Fitness.

Mark E Burkard1,2, Beth A Weaver3,4.   

Abstract

Low rates of chromosomal instability (CIN) are weakly tumor promoting, whereas high rates of CIN cause cell death and tumor suppression. In this context, Sansregret and colleagues show that one mechanism to restrain excessive CIN in tumor cells and increase fitness is through mutations in the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome. This serves to delay mitotic progression and decrease the rate of chromosome missegregation. Cancer Discov; 7(2); 134-6. ©2017 AACRSee related article by Sansregret et al., p. 218. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167614      PMCID: PMC5312840          DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Discov        ISSN: 2159-8274            Impact factor:   39.397


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome segregation and cancer: cutting through the mystery.

Authors:  P V Jallepalli; C Lengauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Adaptive Resistance to an Inhibitor of Chromosomal Instability in Human Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Bernardo Orr; Lama Talje; Zhexian Liu; Benjamin H Kwok; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  2n or not 2n: Aneuploidy, polyploidy and chromosomal instability in primary and tumor cells.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Eric M C Britigan; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Kristen A Andersen; Dabin Yeum; Gabrielle B Rocque; Lee G Wilke; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Ronald T Raines; Mark E Burkard; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Dynamics of Tumor Heterogeneity Derived from Clonal Karyotypic Evolution.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Sergi Elizalde; Giulio Genovese; Samuel F Bakhoum
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Chromosome missegregation rate predicts whether aneuploidy will promote or suppress tumors.

Authors:  Alain D Silk; Lauren M Zasadil; Andrew J Holland; Benjamin Vitre; Don W Cleveland; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  APC/C Dysfunction Limits Excessive Cancer Chromosomal Instability.

Authors:  James O Patterson; Sally Dewhurst; Laurent Sansregret; Carlos López-García; André Koch; Nicholas McGranahan; William Chong Hang Chao; David J Barry; Andrew Rowan; Rachael Instrell; Stuart Horswell; Michael Way; Michael Howell; Martin R Singleton; René H Medema; Paul Nurse; Mark Petronczki; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Is Not Essential for Viability of Human Cells with Genetically Lowered APC/C Activity.

Authors:  Thomas Wild; Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen; Takeo Narita; Julie Schou; Jakob Nilsson; Chunaram Choudhary
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Sarah L Thompson; Amity L Manning; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Increased expression of BubR1 protects against aneuploidy and cancer and extends healthy lifespan.

Authors:  Darren J Baker; Meelad M Dawlaty; Tobias Wijshake; Karthik B Jeganathan; Liviu Malureanu; Janine H van Ree; Ruben Crespo-Diaz; Santiago Reyes; Lauren Seaburg; Virginia Shapiro; Atta Behfar; Andre Terzic; Bart van de Sluis; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 28.824

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  DNA Damage Response Inhibitors in Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Öykü Gönül Geyik; Giulia Anichini; Engin Ulukaya; Fabio Marra; Chiara Raggi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Targeting the cell cycle in breast cancer: towards the next phase.

Authors:  K L Thu; I Soria-Bretones; T W Mak; D W Cescon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Disruption of the anaphase-promoting complex confers resistance to TTK inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  K L Thu; J Silvester; M J Elliott; W Ba-Alawi; M H Duncan; A C Elia; A S Mer; P Smirnov; Z Safikhani; B Haibe-Kains; T W Mak; D W Cescon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Centrosome Aberrations as Drivers of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katrina M Piemonte; Lindsey J Anstine; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 6.  DNA Replication Stress and Chromosomal Instability: Dangerous Liaisons.

Authors:  Therese Wilhelm; Maha Said; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.