Literature DB >> 28167438

A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Zoltan Kozinszky1, Annamária Töreki2, Emőke A Hompoth2, Robert B Dudas3, Gábor Németh2.   

Abstract

We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a critical analysis of the literature. Between April 2011 and January 2015, a sample of 2967 pregnant women (between 12th and 30th weeks of gestation) and 714 women 6 weeks after delivery completed the Hungarian version of the EPDS in South-East Hungary. EFAs suggested unidimensionality in both samples. 33 out of 42 previously published models showed good and 6 acceptable fit with our antepartum data in CFAs, whilst 10 of them showed good and 28 acceptable fit in our postpartum sample. Using multiple fit indices, our theory-driven anhedonia (items 1,2) - anxiety (items 4,5) - low mood (items 8,9) model provided the best fit in the antepartum sample. In the postpartum sample, our theory-driven models were again among the best performing models, including an anhedonia and an anxiety factor together with either a low mood or a suicidal risk factor (items 3,6,10). The EPDS showed moderate within- and between-culture invariability, although this would also need to be re-examined with a theory-driven approach.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antepartum depression; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; Factor structure; Postpartum depression; Theory-driven models

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167438     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  11 in total

1.  Subconstructs of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale in a postpartum sample in Mexico City.

Authors:  Julie D Flom; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Lourdes Schnaas; Paul C Curtin; Rosalind J Wright; Robert O Wright; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Maria José Rosa
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Construct Validity and Responsiveness of Instruments Measuring Depression and Anxiety in Pregnancy: A Comparison of EPDS, HADS-A and CES-D.

Authors:  Hanna Margaretha Heller; Stasja Draisma; Adriaan Honig
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Perinatal depressive symptoms and breastfeeding behaviors: A systematic literature review and biosocial research agenda.

Authors:  Margaret S Butler; Sera L Young; Emily L Tuthill
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Screening of postpartum depression among new mothers in Istanbul: a psychometric evaluation of the Turkish Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  Perran Boran; Ahmed Waqas; Öykü Özbörü Aşkan; İrem Topçu; Tugay Dogan; Atif Rahman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-07-28

5.  Factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Kenta Matsumura; Kei Hamazaki; Akiko Tsuchida; Haruka Kasamatsu; Hidekuni Inadera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression.

Authors:  Johanne Smith-Nielsen; Stephen Matthey; Theis Lange; Mette Skovgaard Væver
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Establishing a coherent and replicable measurement model of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  Colin R Martin; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale: Stable structure but subscale of limited value to detect anxiety.

Authors:  Angarath I van der Zee-van den Berg; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Education level and risk of postpartum depression: results from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Authors:  Kenta Matsumura; Kei Hamazaki; Akiko Tsuchida; Haruka Kasamatsu; Hidekuni Inadera
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Factor Structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a Sample of Postpartum Slovak Women.

Authors:  Zuzana Škodová; Ľubica Bánovčinová; Eva Urbanová; Marián Grendár; Martina Bašková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.