Margaret S Butler1, Sera L Young2, Emily L Tuthill3. 1. Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University. Electronic address: msb2023@u.northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University; Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. 3. Department of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is recommended to improve maternal and infant health globally. Depression has been posited to negatively impact breastfeeding, although potential causal and bidirectional pathways between these two phenomena have not been sufficiently characterized. We therefore conducted a systematic review to critically evaluate available evidence on the relationship between perinatal depressive symptoms and breastfeeding behaviors; to identify knowledge gaps and propose a biosocial research agenda to advance our understanding of this topic. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was applied across seven databases. Data were extracted and aggregated using the matrix method to provide a narrative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies from 20 countries spanning 1988 through 2018 fit the inclusion criteria. In general, methods across studies were heterogeneous. Fourteen different tools were used to measure perinatal depressive symptoms. Nearly half the studies did not provide breastfeeding definitions. No studies from low-income countries met inclusion criteria. More than half (63%) of studies demonstrated a negative association between depressive symptoms across the perinatal period and less exclusive breastfeeding and/or shorter breastfeeding durations. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity in study design, definitions, assessment tools, and measurement time points limited the comparability of study findings. Causality cannot be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests perinatal depressive symptoms negatively associated with breastfeeding exclusivity and duration, which can lead to suboptimal infant nutrition and detrimental impacts on maternal mental and physical health. To better understand this relationship, we propose including consistent operationalization and assessment of depression and breastfeeding globally and concurrent repeated measures of key biological and social factors.
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is recommended to improve maternal and infant health globally. Depression has been posited to negatively impact breastfeeding, although potential causal and bidirectional pathways between these two phenomena have not been sufficiently characterized. We therefore conducted a systematic review to critically evaluate available evidence on the relationship between perinatal depressive symptoms and breastfeeding behaviors; to identify knowledge gaps and propose a biosocial research agenda to advance our understanding of this topic. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was applied across seven databases. Data were extracted and aggregated using the matrix method to provide a narrative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies from 20 countries spanning 1988 through 2018 fit the inclusion criteria. In general, methods across studies were heterogeneous. Fourteen different tools were used to measure perinatal depressive symptoms. Nearly half the studies did not provide breastfeeding definitions. No studies from low-income countries met inclusion criteria. More than half (63%) of studies demonstrated a negative association between depressive symptoms across the perinatal period and less exclusive breastfeeding and/or shorter breastfeeding durations. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity in study design, definitions, assessment tools, and measurement time points limited the comparability of study findings. Causality cannot be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests perinatal depressive symptoms negatively associated with breastfeeding exclusivity and duration, which can lead to suboptimal infant nutrition and detrimental impacts on maternal mental and physical health. To better understand this relationship, we propose including consistent operationalization and assessment of depression and breastfeeding globally and concurrent repeated measures of key biological and social factors.
Authors: Christine E Parsons; Katherine S Young; Tamsen J Rochat; Morten L Kringelbach; Alan Stein Journal: Br Med Bull Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.291
Authors: Nigel C Rollins; Nita Bhandari; Nemat Hajeebhoy; Susan Horton; Chessa K Lutter; Jose C Martines; Ellen G Piwoz; Linda M Richter; Cesar G Victora Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Emily M Nagel; Mariann A Howland; Cynthia Pando; Jamie Stang; Susan M Mason; David A Fields; Ellen W Demerath Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 3.393