| Literature DB >> 28166723 |
Seydina M Diene1, Anna Rita Corvaglia1, Patrice François2, Nathalie van der Mee-Marquet3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that prophages in the ST398 S. aureus clone are responsible for expanding ST398's spectrum of action and increasing its ability to cause human infections. We carried out the first characterization of the various prophages carried by 76 ST398 bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates obtained over 9 years of observation.Entities:
Keywords: Bloodstream infections; CC398 lineage; Evolution; Livestock-associated; Phage content; Prophage; Staphylococcus aureus; φ3-prophage
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28166723 PMCID: PMC5294865 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3516-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1General results of the whole-genome sequence analysis. 1 Single-nucleotide polymorphism between core genomes in the human and animal ST398 isolates. In this comparison, 14–265 is used as the reference genome; 2(Ac) colonizing animal-associated isolate, (Ai) infecting animal-associated isolate; all other isolates are from human BSI 3Oxa (methicillin), K (kanamycin), T (tobramycin), E (erythromycin), Te (tetracycline), Fu (fusidic acid); 4(+) Tn916-like element, with no tet gene; 5 + (2) two different prophages harboured into the bacterial genome
Major characteristics of the 35 prophages carried by the 22 ST398 isolates studied
| Phage names | Cluster | Ac. N° of the host genome | Size (bp) | %G + C | Number of CDSs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–285 phi01 | φ3 | LNJH00000000 | 47′596 | 32.76 | 62 |
| 15–166 phi02 | φ3 | LXGQ00000000 | 47′598 | 32.76 | 64 |
| 14–296 phi01 | φ3 | LXGS00000000 | 47′598 | 32.76 | 64 |
| 12–148 phi01 | φ3 | LXGP00000000 | 47′595 | 32.76 | 64 |
| 10–234 phi01 | φ3 | LXGR00000000 | 76′003 | 31.38 | 93 |
| 10–386 4pro | φ3 | AUPV0100000 | 42′906 | 33.08 | 59 |
| 14–613 phi02 | φ3 | LNJN00000000 | 47′149 | 32.76 | 62 |
| 14–639 phi01 | φ3 | LNJO00000000 | 47′598 | 32.75 | 62 |
| 13–246 phi01 | φ3 | LNJK00000000 | 47′598 | 32.76 | 62 |
| 07–72 phi01 | φ3 | AUPW0100000 | 51′402 | 32.68 | 67 |
| 13–192 phi02 | φ3 | LNJF00000000 | 46′241 | 32.67 | 61 |
| 12–154 phi02 | φ3 | LNJJ00000000 | 31′531 | 31.90 | 41 |
| 14–118 phi01 | φ3 | LNJL00000000 | 47′581 | 32.75 | 62 |
| 11–192 phi01 | φ3 | LNJI00000000 | 48′616 | 32.71 | 65 |
| 10–17 phi02 | φ3 | LNJG00000000 | 71′567 | 32.01 | 69 |
| 14–613 phi01 | MR11-like | LNJN00000000 | 60′024 | 34.61 | 77 |
| 15–166 phi01 | MR11-like | LXGQ00000000 | 59′797 | 34.63 | 80 |
| 10–386 5pro | MR11-like | AUPV0100000 | 43′301 | 35.14 | 66 |
| 12–154 phi01 | MR11-like | LNJJ00000000 | 46′683 | 34.95 | 59 |
| 33972 phi01 | MR11-like | LNKX00000000 | 60′070 | 35.55 | 74 |
| 10–17 phi01 | MR11-like | LNJG00000000 | 69′195 | 34.16 | 83 |
| 14–265 phi02 | MR11-like | LNJM00000000 | 50′513 | 35.04 | 66 |
| s130 phi02 | MR11-like | AUPT0100000 | 48′363 | 34.69 | 75 |
| s1 3pro | MR11-like | AUPS0100000 | 41′392 | 35.60 | 67 |
| 33924 phi01 | MR11-like | LNKW00000000 | 42′831 | 35.53 | 69 |
| s0385 phi01 | Others | NC_017333 | 48′968 | 33.73 | 68 |
| s03985 phi02 | Others | NC_017333 | 72′587 | 33.13 | 75 |
| s1 2pro | Others | AUPS0100000 | 45′572 | 33.34 | 61 |
| s130 phi01 | Others | AUPT0100000 | 48′456 | 33.69 | 64 |
| 33972 phi02 | Others | LNKX00000000 | 72′917 | 33.1 | 72 |
| 33924 phi02 | Others | LNKW00000000 | 61′369 | 33.66 | 100 |
| 33924 phi03 | Others | LNKW00000000 | 36′575 | 33.48 | 59 |
| 14–265 phi01 | Others | LNJM00000000 | 48′081 | 33.96 | 65 |
| 12–154 phi03 | Others | LNJJ00000000 | 56′681 | 34.15 | 76 |
| 13–192 phi01 | Others | LNJF00000000 | 42′303 | 34.30 | 62 |
Fig. 2Comparisons of the proteomes of animal-associated infecting (AI, in red), animal-associated colonizing (AC, in light red), and human BSI-associated (from dark to light blue) S. aureus ST398 isolates. This figure was created with the “CGView Comparison Tool” [21]. From the outside to the inside: ring 1, COG classification (see COG definitions in Additional file 4: Table S1) of ORFs shown in ring 2; rings 2 and 3, ORFs; ring 4, COG classification of ORFs shown in ring 3; rings 5 to 10 (in red and light red), the AI and AC genomes; rings 11 and 12 (in dark yellow), the reference genome (HI SA10-17 isolate) and the unusual HI SA14_265 genome; rings 13 to 26 (in blue), all other HI genomes; rings 27 and 28, the %GC content and GC skew, respectively, of the reference genome. Arrows indicate the locations of the φ3-like and MR11-like prophages, the transposon Tn916, and the SCCmec IV type in the SA10-17 genome
Fig. 3Proteome-based clustering of the prophages harbored by BSI isolates. The tree was inferred using the online web-server “CVTree3” program (http://tlife.fudan.edu.cn/cvtree3/). Branch lengths referring to the sequence variations are shown on the tree
Characterization of the genomes of 35 prophages encoding putative factors related to virulence, the regulation of transcription, toxin-antitoxin systems, defense systems and genetic plasticity