| Literature DB >> 28166543 |
Lisa Alexander1, Keith Woeste1,2.
Abstract
Northern red oak is a high-value hardwood used for lumber, furniture and veneer. Intensively managed northern red oak seed orchards are required to obtain genetic gain for trait improvement. Data from conifer seed orchards and natural and managed stands of hardwood trees have shed light on the distance over which pollen can move, and underscore the need for managerial attention to seed orchard design, placement, and maintenance. We used eleven microsatellite markers to investigate pollen gene flow, female mate choice, and male reproductive success in a clonal seed orchard of northern red oak based on paternity analysis of seed orchard offspring in progeny tests. Nearly all (93%) offspring were sired by a male parent within the seed orchard. The mean number of male parents per year was 69.5, or 47.6% of all clones in the seed orchard. Female clones in the early phenology group had more offspring sired from extra-orchard pollen (13%) than clones in the intermediate (5%) and late (1%) phenology groups. Distance was the largest influence on pollination success, and pollination occurred most often by male trees in the same subline as the maternal tree. Males in the early phenology group sired more offspring overall in the progeny pool and more offspring per mother tree than males in the intermediate or late phenology groups. Average genetic correlations among all OP progeny ranged between 0.2557 and 0.3529 with a mean of 0.28±0.01. The importance of progeny test genotyping for northern red oak improvement likely is increasing with the demand for improved varieties. The current study demonstrated the feasibility of post hoc assembly of full-sib families for genetic analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28166543 PMCID: PMC5293549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Diversity statistics of microsatellite loci used to type northern red oak seed orchard parents and offspring.
| Locus | N | PIC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 671 | 0.876 | 0.888 | 0.878 | |
| 36 | 669 | 0.918 | 0.949 | 0.946 | |
| 38 | 653 | 0.778 | 0.818 | 0.801 | |
| 12 | 599 | 0.721 | 0.797 | 0.772 | |
| 52 | 590 | 0.842 | 0.926 | 0.92 | |
| 30 | 619 | 0.855 | 0.944 | 0.941 | |
| 39 | 574 | 0.742 | 0.933 | 0.928 | |
| 34 | 554 | 0.827 | 0.888 | 0.878 | |
| 19 | 660 | 0.894 | 0.876 | 0.864 |
*A, number of alleles; N, number of individuals typed; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphic information content. N = 697 trees. Parents are located in a clonal seed orchard; offspring are located in three progeny tests established in 2007 and 2008 in Indiana, USA.
Analysis of variance in female sampling rate measured as number of male parents in the offspring pool of ten grafted northern red oak seed orchard clones in Indiana, USA.
| Source | DF | SS | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 10 | 4.23 | 0.423 | 9.61 | 0.0215 |
| Error | 4 | 0.176 | 0.0441 | ||
| Corrected Total | 14 | 4.41 | |||
| Clone | 9 | 2.97 | 0.330 | 7.48 | 0.0341 |
| Year | 1 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 28.7 | 0.0058 |
*‘Clone’ is the maternal genotype.
**Year of progeny test establishment.
Type I SS shown for individual sources of variation; α = 0.05.
Least squares means for sources of variation in female sampling rate in a northern red oak seed orchard clonal seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
| Source of variation | Sampling rate mean | Standard error | Tukey group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 2.48 | 0.220 | a |
| 65 | 2.20 | 0.220 | ab |
| 41 | 1.92 | 0.220 | abc |
| 33 | 1.90 | 0.149 | abc |
| 132 | 1.89 | 0.220 | abc |
| 165 | 1.77 | 0.149 | bc |
| 112 | 1.52 | 0.149 | bc |
| 6 | 1.46 | 0.149 | cd |
| 107 | 1.40 | 0.149 | cd |
| 123 | 1.01 | 0.220 | d |
| 2007 | 1.40 | 0.115 | a |
| 2008 | 2.11 | 0.0664 | b |
| Early | 1.62 | 0.256 | a |
| Intermediate | 1.80 | 0.256 | a |
| Late | 2.06 | 0.256 | a |
Female sampling rate measured as the number of male parents represented in the offspring pool of each clone.
*‘Clone’ is the maternal genotype.
**Year of progeny test establishment.
†Phenological group of the maternal genotype.
‡ Class level lsmeans in different Tukey groups are significantly different at the α = 0.05 level.
Number and percent of northern red oak progeny test offspring from grafted seed orchard maternal clones in early (E), intermediate (M), late (L), and unknown (u) phenological classes by paternal phenological class.
| Maternal phenological class | Paternal phenological class | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | I | L | u | Total | |
| Number | 23 | 35 | 21 | 23 | 102 |
| Per cent | 23% | 34% | 21% | 23% | 100 |
| E | I | L | u | Total | |
| Number | 27 | 38 | 21 | 12 | 98 |
| Per cent | 28% | 39% | 21% | 12% | 100 |
| E | I | L | u | Total | |
| Number | 18 | 51 | 16 | 6 | 91 |
| Per cent | 20% | 56% | 18% | 7% | 100 |
Fig 1Ranked frequency distribution and null-expectation (broken line) male reproductive success in a clonal northern red oak seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
Reproductive success for years 2007 (left, 1.69 expected) and 2008 (right, 3.05 expected) based on paternity analysis of 336 progeny test offspring.
Fig 2Regression of number of offspring sired on number of female mates for 99 northern red oak clones serving as male parents in a grafted northern red oak seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
Saturation of symbols denotes the number of observations for that coordinate pair: light gray = 1 to 5; dark gray = 6 to 19; black = 20+.
Fig 3Mean proportions of within-subline matings for ten maternal genotypes in a clonal northern red oak seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
Error bars are the standard error of the mean proportion across males for each maternal genotype (average number of males per maternal genotype: 19.9±4.04; range: 6 to 47 males. Families are ordered from left to right by maternal phenological rank. Average size of OP family: 33.6±5.06; range: 15 to 67 offspring. Total offspring pool was 336 open-pollinated progeny.
Proportion of northern red oak progeny test offspring from ten maternal clones in the early, intermediate, or late phenological class resulting from within-subline pollination.
| Maternal Phenological class | Proportion within-subline mating |
|---|---|
| Early | 0.48 ± 0.083 |
| Early + Intermediate | 0.52 ± 0.072 |
| Intermediate | 0.60 ± 0.12 |
| Late | 0.83 ± 0.062 |
Proportions of within-subline matings followed by different letters were significantly different at the α = 0.05 confidence level.
Least squared means for significant sources of variation in male reproductive success in a five-subline grafted northern red oak seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
| Source of variation | Number progeny lsmean | Standard error | Tukey group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance | |||
| 1 | 2.75 | 0.24 | a |
| 2 | 1.49 | 0.28 | b |
| 3 | 1.24 | 0.35 | b |
| 4 | 1.37 | 0.51 | b |
| Paternal phenology | |||
| Early | 2.40 | 0.41 | a |
| Late | 1.52 | 0.35 | ab |
| Intermediate | 1.46 | 0.27 | b |
Offspring from ten maternal genotypes were sampled. Male reproductive success estimated as the number of progeny test offspring per seed orchard female.
*Distance category ‘1’ represents within-subline pollinations, ‘2’ neighboring sublines, ‘3’ non-neighboring sublines in the main orchard area, and ‘4’ represents pollinations from a subline approximately 1 km south of the main orchard area.
**Class level lsmeans in different Tukey groups are significantly different at the α = 0.05 level).
Fig 4Proportions of half-sibs and full-sibs in five open-pollinated (OP) families established from a clonal northern red oak seed orchard in 2007 (left) and 2008 (right).
Average genetic correlation between offspring pair ij (GCij) was calculated for each family and is presented above each bar. Families are ordered from left to right by phenological rank. Average size of 2007 OP family: 18.8±1.46; range: 15 to 23 offspring; average size of 2008 OP family: 20.9±1.36; range: 15 to 27 offspring.
Average genetic correlation (GCij) among offspring of 10 northern red oak open-pollinated families from a clonal seed orchard in Indiana, USA.
| Family | Overall genetic correlation ( | Ratio of overall to mean yearly ( |
|---|---|---|
| 112 | 0.2557 | 0.979 |
| 6 | 0.2602 | 0.986 |
| 107 | 0.2610 | 0.982 |
| 123 | 0.2619 | |
| 165 | 0.2620 | 0.980 |
| 33 | 0.2706 | 1.009 |
| 41 | 0.2758 | |
| 132 | 0.2828 | |
| 65 | 0.3281 | |
| 70 | 0.3529 | |
| Mean | 0.2811 | |
| Year | ||
| 2007 | 0.2530 | 0.989 |
| 2008 | 0.2601 | 0.904 |
| Mean | 0.2566 |
*The ratio of overall GCij to mean yearly GCij is presented for each family with offspring in both the 2007 and 2008 progeny tests. Mean yearly GCij for families are averaged over two years and mean yearly GCij for years are averaged over families (5 in 2007, 10 in 2008).