Literature DB >> 28166183

Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Cristen Cusumano1, David R Friedmann, Yixin Fang, Binhuan Wang, J Thomas Roland, Susan B Waltzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the performance plateau after unilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in prelingually and postlingually deafened adults and to compare their relative progress. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Prelingually and postlingually deaf adults who received a unilateral CI and completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up at our center. INTERVENTION: Unilateral CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standard speech perception testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC] monosyllabic word test and hearing in noise test [HINT] or AzBio sentence test) were performed preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: In postlingually deaf patients (n = 102), there was a significant improvement in word scores for 3 years postimplantation (p < 0.01). Beyond the 3 years postoperative time point, word scores continued to improve, albeit at a flatter rate. In prelingually deaf patients (n = 16) word scores improved significantly for 5 years postimplantation (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Adults with postlingual deafness undergoing unilateral CI show significant improvement in speech perception for 3 years postimplantation, at which point their performance continues to improve, albeit at a flatter rate. The performance of adults with prelingual deafness improves significantly as late as 5 years postimplantation. These time intervals reflect a change to the currently reported 6 to 12 months period and should impact on counseling, especially in the prelingual CI candidate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28166183     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation performance outcomes in patients over 80 years old.

Authors:  Helena Wichova; Dawna Mills; Sarah Beatty; Kevin Peng; Mia Miller
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Bruce J Gantz; Susan B Waltzman; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery does not appear to impact cochlear implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type II.

Authors:  Justyn Pisa; Jacob Sulkers; James B Butler; Michael West; Jordan B Hochman
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

4.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Nichole C Dwyer; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Alexander T Murr; Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Emily Buss; English R King; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Matthew M Dedmon; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.970

8.  Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Christopher K Giardina; Emily Buss; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Yossi Bugannim; Doreen Zechoval; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Petrina La Faire; Xiaodong Tan; Pamela Fiebig; David M Landsberger; Alan G Micco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.