Literature DB >> 28165597

Increase in safe zone area of the acetabular cup using dual mobility cups in THA.

Takaaki Ohmori1, Tamon Kabata1, Toru Maeda1, Yoshitomo Kajino1, Tadashi Taga1, Kazuhiro Hasegawa1, Daisuke Inoue1, Takashi Yamamoto1, Tomoharu Takagi1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual mobility cup (DMC) inserts reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). No available research has clearly delineated stability advantages of DMC inserts in primary and revision THA. We investigated: (i) the degree of change in the safe zone of the cup when a DMC insert is used compared to a fixed insert; (ii) the method of selecting candidates for a DMC insert without changing the position of the acetabular (cup) component during revision THA in frequent dislocation cases caused by implant impingement.
METHODS: A model of the pelvis and femur was developed from computed tomography images. The safe zone was defined as the area in the acetabular component, over which conditions for stable range of motion were satisfied. The safe zone was calculated for both a fixed and a DMC insert over a predetermined range of 3-D motion, and the effect of increasing the anteversion position of the femoral component from 5° to 35° was quantified.
RESULTS: The lowest ratio of the area of the safe zone was about 4.9 at 20° anteverison of the femoral component. Safe zone of DMC inserts zone had increased stability of 10°-15° in both vertical and horizontal directions, compared to fixed inserts.A 5- to10-fold expansion of the safe zone can be expected with the use of DMC insert.
CONCLUSIONS: DMC insert could help to set the acetabular component more accurately in primary and revision THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165597     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

1.  Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.

Authors:  Aonnicha Burapachaisri; Ameer Elbuluk; Edem Abotsi; Jim Pierrepont; Seth A Jerabek; Aaron J Buckland; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Effect of changing femoral head diameter on bony and prosthetic jumping angles.

Authors:  Takaaki Ohmori; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Tadashi Taga; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Junya Yoshitani; Takuro Ueno; Ken Ueoka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  John E Farey; Tamara Hooper; Tania Alland; Justine M Naylor; Thu-Lan Kelly; Michelle Lorimer; Adriane M Lewin; Margaret Rogers; Chi Kin Law; Jacqueline Close; Steven E Graves; Richard S de Steiger; Peter L Lewis; Sam Adie; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Dual mobility in hip arthroplasty: What evidence do we need?

Authors:  S Horriat; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.