Literature DB >> 30377824

Effect of changing femoral head diameter on bony and prosthetic jumping angles.

Takaaki Ohmori1, Tamon Kabata2, Yoshitomo Kajino1, Daisuke Inoue1, Tadashi Taga1, Takashi Yamamoto1, Tomoharu Takagi1, Junya Yoshitani1, Takuro Ueno1, Ken Ueoka1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In THA, using a larger femoral head can increase the oscillation angle and jumping distance. However, there have been no reports which indicate precisely how increasing the jumping distance leads to an increase in the angle from impingement to dislocation (jumping angle). In this study, we clarified the jumping angle of various head diameters and its relationship with pelvic morphology.
METHODS: Using a three-dimensional templating system, virtual THA and ROM simulations were performed in 82 patients. We investigated the distance between bony and prosthetic impingement points and the head centre and calculated the jumping angle for various head diameters. We measured various pelvic shapes and length to clarify the relationship between pelvic morphology and impingement distance.
RESULTS: Jumping angles were 7.7° ± 3.2°, 12.1° ± 1.6°, 15.4° ± 2.5° and 10.0° ± 3.0° with flexion, internal rotation with 90° flexion (IR), extension and external rotation (ER), respectively, when we used a 22-mm head diameter. Bony jumping angle increased about 0.5°, 0.8°, 1.0° and 0.7° per 2-mm increase in head diameter with flexion, IR, extension and ER. On the other hand, prosthetic jumping angle remained almost stable at about 31°. Impingement distance was related to pelvic morphology in all directions. Bony jumping angles differed with ROM; the biggest was seen with extension, followed by IR, ER and flexion. On the other hand, bony jumping angle was less than prosthetic jumping angle in all cases.
CONCLUSION: Bony jumping angles differed with ROM; the biggest was seen with extension, followed by IR, ER and flexion. Prosthetic impingement angles were stable. In addition, the bony jumping angle was less than the prosthetic jumping angle in all cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impingement distance; Jumping angle; Jumping distance; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30377824     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2325-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  30 in total

1.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Philippe Leonard; Patrick Mamoudy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Design-related fretting wear in modular neck hip prosthesis.

Authors:  M Viceconti; O Ruggeri; A Toni; A Giunti
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-02

3.  Total hip replacement through a posterior approach using a 22 mm diameter femoral head : the role of the transverse acetabular ligament and capsular repair in reducing the rate of dislocation.

Authors:  V Kumar; S Sharma; J James; J P Hodgkinson; M V Hemmady
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Bone Morphology in Hip Dysplasia and Its Effect on Hip Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Nobuo Adachi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years.

Authors:  E Simian; R Chatellard; J Druon; J Berhouet; P Rosset
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms.

Authors:  Michael J Dunbar
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Gregory M Alberton; Whitney A High; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement.

Authors:  Charlotte B Phillips; Jane A Barrett; Elena Losina; Nizar N Mahomed; Elizabeth A Lingard; Edward Guadagnoli; John A Baron; William H Harris; Robert Poss; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Effect of femoral head size on polyethylene wear and synovitis after total hip arthroplasty: a sonographic and radiographic study of 39 patients.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Otto Robertsson; Uldis Kesteris; Romas Jonas Kalesinskas; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Ryo Mori; Michio Hamanishi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Horror of three synergistic factors in THA: high mechanical stress, dissimilar metals, low elasticity stem: a case report.

Authors:  Seiya Ishii; Yasuhiro Homma; Takehisa Matsukawa; Tomonori Baba; Ayano Kubota; Kazuhito Yokoyama; Kazuo Kaneko; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-10-05

2.  The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Widmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.