Lindsay M Braun1, Daniel A Rodriguez2, Yan Song1, Katie A Meyer3, Cora E Lewis4, Jared P Reis5, Penny Gordon-Larsen6. 1. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley. 3. Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 4. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine , University of Alabama at Birmingham. 5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Prevention and Population Sciences Program. 6. Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While many studies have found the built environment to be associated with walking, most have used cross-sectional research designs and few have examined more distal cardiometabolic outcomes. This study contributes longitudinal evidence based on changes in walking, body mass index (BMI), and cardiometabolic risk following residential relocation. METHODS: We examined 1,079 participants in the CARDIA study who moved residential locations between 2000 and 2006 (ages 32-46 in 2000, 49% white/51% black, 55% female). We created a walkability index from measures of population density, street connectivity, and food and physical activity resources, measured at participants' pre- and post-move residential locations. Outcomes measured before and after the move included walking, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, insulin resistance, triglycerides, cholesterol, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and C-reactive protein. Fixed effects (FE) models were used to estimate associations between within-person change in walkability and within-person change in each outcome. These estimates were compared to those from random effects (RE) models to assess the implications of unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: In FE models, a one-SD increase in walkability was associated with a 0.81 mmHg decrease in systolic blood pressure [95% CI: (-1.55, -0.07)] and a 7.36 percent increase in C-reactive protein [95% CI: (0.60, 14.57)]. Although several significant associations were observed in the RE models, Hausman tests suggested that these estimates were biased for most outcomes. RE estimates were most commonly biased away from the null or in the opposite direction of effect as the FE estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Greater walkability was associated with lower blood pressure and higher C-reactive protein in FE models, potentially reflecting competing health risks and benefits in dense, walkable environments. RE models tended to overstate or otherwise misrepresent the relationship between walkability and health. Approaches that base estimates on variation between individuals may be subject to bias from unmeasured confounding, such as residential self-selection.
BACKGROUND: While many studies have found the built environment to be associated with walking, most have used cross-sectional research designs and few have examined more distal cardiometabolic outcomes. This study contributes longitudinal evidence based on changes in walking, body mass index (BMI), and cardiometabolic risk following residential relocation. METHODS: We examined 1,079 participants in the CARDIA study who moved residential locations between 2000 and 2006 (ages 32-46 in 2000, 49% white/51% black, 55% female). We created a walkability index from measures of population density, street connectivity, and food and physical activity resources, measured at participants' pre- and post-move residential locations. Outcomes measured before and after the move included walking, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, insulin resistance, triglycerides, cholesterol, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and C-reactive protein. Fixed effects (FE) models were used to estimate associations between within-person change in walkability and within-person change in each outcome. These estimates were compared to those from random effects (RE) models to assess the implications of unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: In FE models, a one-SD increase in walkability was associated with a 0.81 mmHg decrease in systolic blood pressure [95% CI: (-1.55, -0.07)] and a 7.36 percent increase in C-reactive protein [95% CI: (0.60, 14.57)]. Although several significant associations were observed in the RE models, Hausman tests suggested that these estimates were biased for most outcomes. RE estimates were most commonly biased away from the null or in the opposite direction of effect as the FE estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Greater walkability was associated with lower blood pressure and higher C-reactive protein in FE models, potentially reflecting competing health risks and benefits in dense, walkable environments. RE models tended to overstate or otherwise misrepresent the relationship between walkability and health. Approaches that base estimates on variation between individuals may be subject to bias from unmeasured confounding, such as residential self-selection.
Entities:
Keywords:
built environment; fixed effects; residential self-selection; walkability; walking
Authors: Eva Leslie; Brian Saelens; Lawrence Frank; Neville Owen; Adrian Bauman; Neil Coffee; Graeme Hugo Journal: Health Place Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Christine M Hoehner; Laura K Brennan Ramirez; Michael B Elliott; Susan L Handy; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Wendy C King; Steven H Belle; Jennifer S Brach; Laurey R Simkin-Silverman; Tracy Soska; Andrea M Kriska Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: James F Sallis; Robert B Cervero; William Ascher; Karla A Henderson; M Katherine Kraft; Jacqueline Kerr Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2006 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Andrew Rundle; Ana V Diez Roux; Lance M Free; Douglas Miller; Kathryn M Neckerman; Christopher C Weiss Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2007 Mar-Apr
Authors: Ethan M Berke; Thomas D Koepsell; Anne Vernez Moudon; Richard E Hoskins; Eric B Larson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jingjing Li; Amy H Auchincloss; Jana A Hirsch; Steven J Melly; Kari A Moore; Adam Peterson; Brisa N Sánchez Journal: Health Place Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Maricela Cruz; Adam Drewnowski; Jennifer F Bobb; Philip M Hurvitz; Anne Vernez Moudon; Andrea Cook; Stephen J Mooney; James H Buszkiewicz; Paula Lozano; Dori E Rosenberg; Flavia Kapos; Mary Kay Theis; Jane Anau; David Arterburn Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Minsuk Oh; David R Jacobs; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Wei Bao; Gary L Pierce; Lucas J Carr; Jingzhong Ding; Kara M Whitaker Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: A Drewnowski; D Arterburn; J Zane; A Aggarwal; S Gupta; P M Hurvitz; A V Moudon; J Bobb; A Cook; P Lozano; D Rosenberg Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2018-12-28
Authors: Melody Smith; Vlad Obolonkin; Lindsay Plank; Leon Iusitini; Euan Forsyth; Tom Stewart; Janis Paterson; El-Shadan Tautolo; Fa'asisila Savila; Elaine Rush Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 3.390