| Literature DB >> 28163917 |
Rae-Anne Hardie1,2, Ellen van Dam1, Mark Cowley1, Ting-Li Han3, Seher Balaban4, Marina Pajic1,2, Mark Pinese1,2, Mary Iconomou1,2, Robert F Shearer1,2, Jessie McKenna1, David Miller5, Nicola Waddell5, John V Pearson5, Sean M Grimmond5, Leonid Sazanov6, Andrew V Biankin7, Silas Villas-Boas3, Andrew J Hoy4,8, Nigel Turner9, Darren N Saunders1,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a five-year survival rate of ~8%, with characteristic molecular heterogeneity and restricted treatment options. Targeting metabolism has emerged as a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for cancers such as pancreatic cancer, which are driven by genetic alterations that are not tractable drug targets. Although somatic mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) mutations have been observed in various tumors types, understanding of metabolic genotype-phenotype relationships is limited.Entities:
Keywords: Genome; Glutamine; Lipid; Metabolomics; Mitochondria; Pancreas
Year: 2017 PMID: 28163917 PMCID: PMC5282905 DOI: 10.1186/s40170-017-0164-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Metab ISSN: 2049-3002
Fig. 1Mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) sequence analysis in pancreatic cancer PDCLs. a Schematic showing the approach used to map genotype:phenotype relationships in pancreatic cancer. b Distribution of somatic mtDNA mutations (red lines, n = 24) in 12 pancreatic PDCLs, showing strong bias towards variants in ETC complex I coding and control regions. ETC subunit coding regions are denoted by subunit (colour coded by ETC complex). Position of tRNAs are noted, with ticks marking 500 bp intervals. c Strong selection for non-synonymous mutants in mtDNA and 1056 nuclear genes important for mitochondrial function and metabolism in pancreatic PDCLs compared with a reference survey of mitochondrial variants in infantile mitochondrial disease (Calvo et al. [39]). Statistical comparisons performed using Chi-squared analysis
Somatic mtDNA mutations identified in 12 PDCLs
| Cell line | ChrM position | Normal | Tumour | Cell line | AA change | Region | ETC complex | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCC-02 | 13,195–14,000 | cons | 2 bp del | 2 bp del | Frameshift | ND5 | I | Similar region- colorectal cancer: Polyak 1998 |
| TKCC-03 | 310 | C/T | T | T | - | HVSII | - | |
| 311 | C/T | C | C | - | HVSII | - | ||
| 8276.3–8276.4 | CC ins | :: | :: | - | NC7 | - | ||
| 15,692–15,694 | ATA | ::: del | ::: del | M316Δ | CytB | III | T15693C LVNC cardiomyopathy: Tang 2010 | |
| TKCC-04 | 15,873 | T | - | C/T | M376T | CytB | III | NOVEL |
| TKCC-07 | 309.3 | : | - | C ins | - | HVSII | - | Alzheimer’s: Tanaka 2010 |
| 4971 | G | - | A | G168S | ND2 | I | NOVEL | |
| 7211 | G | - | A | M436M | COI | IV | ||
| 11,361 | T | - | C | M201T | ND4 | I | ||
| 12,731 | T | - | C | V132A | ND5 | I | NOVEL | |
| 13,579 | G | - | A | A415T | ND5 | I | NOVEL | |
| 14,207 | G (C reverse) | - | A (T reverse) | T156I | ND6 | I | ||
| 16,092 | C | - | T | - | HVSI | - | ||
| TKCC-09 | 4137 | C | T | T | Y277Y | NDI | I | |
| 16,188.1 | : | : | C ins | - | HVSI | - | ||
| TKCC-10 | 438 | C | C/T | T | - | L strand promoter | - | |
| TKCC-15-LO | 4560 | G | - | C/g | W30S | ND2 | I | NOVEL |
| TKCC-16-LO | 14,686 | G | - | G/a | - | TE (tRNA) | - | NOVEL |
| TKCC-17-LO | 6029 | C | - | T/c | G42G | COI | IV | |
| TKCC-18-LO | 15,557 | G | - | A | Q271K | CytB | III | NOVEL |
| 16,126 | C | - | T (wt ref. seq) | - | HVSI | - | Glioblastoma T > C Kirches 2001, Brandon 2006 | |
| TKCC-19-LO | 309.1–309.2 | C | CC | CC | - | HVSII | - | |
| TKCC-26-LO | 12,508 | G | - | A | P58N | ND5 | I | NOVEL |
Predicted effects of mutations in ETC subunits
| ETC subunit | PDCL | Mutation | Predicted effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex I human residues (corresponding | |||
| ND5 | TKCC-02 | Frameshift | Part of ND5 loss, therefore no active complex I |
| TKCC-07 | V132A (V119) | V sits at the end of TM4 and faces TM3, may slightly destabilise fold in this area. | |
| TKCC-07 | A415T (V409) | A sits on TM13, facing TMs 9 and 10, may de-stabilise fold in this area and/or make channel cavity leaky in this area. | |
| TKCC-26-LO | D58N (F55) | D sits on the beta-sheet from the beta-H motif, may interfere with conformational coupling. | |
| ND4 | TKCC-07 | M201T (L199) | M sits on key flexible helix 7 and faces the lipid or supernumerary subunit, may interfere with mechanics of TM7 and decrease NADH:Q oxidoreductase activity and/or proton pumping. |
| ND2 | TKCC-07 | G168S (A247) | Directly facing traverse helix HL from ND5, might decrease NADH:Q oxidoreductase activity (or proton pumping only) preventing full movement of HL. |
| TKCC-15-LO | W30S (L108) | W provides part of a seal between ND2 and ND4L, therefore mutation might make it somewhat leaky to protons. | |
| ND6 | TKCC-07 | T156I (V142) | T is near key ND2 Glu34 (GluTM5), so the mutation may interfere with its pKa and so with proton pumping through ND2. Fold in this area will also be disturbed. |
| Complex III (bovine model 2FYU) | |||
| CytB subunit | TKCC-03 | M316Δ | May interfere with fold at the junction with subunit 6. |
| TKCC-04 | M376T | Leu in bovine- peripheral, but may interact with N-term helix from subunit 7. | |
| TKCC-18-LO | E271K | E in bovine- close to heme (6 A, directly facing the edge), so may well interfere with its redox properties. | |
TM transmembrane, ND NADH dehydrogenase subunit, CytB cytochrome B
Somatic nuclear DNA mutations in nuclear encoded mitochondrial and metabolic genes in TKCC pancreatic tumours (n = 12)
| Cell line | Gene | Chrom | Position | Variant Class | Ref. Allele | Tumour Allele 1 | Tumour Allele 2 | dbSNP RS | Normal Allele 1 | Normal Allele 2 | Bp change | AA change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCC-02 | TRIT1 | 1 | 40319722 | Nonsense | G | A | G | novel | G | G | G > A | R112* |
| TKCC-03 | None detected | |||||||||||
| TKCC-04 | MRPS21 | 1 | 150266837 | Silent | G | C | G | novel | G | G | 113G > C | G17G |
| TP53 | 17 | 7578406 | Missense | C | T | T | rs28934578 | C | C | 524C > T | R175H | |
| ACACA | 17 | 35615179 | Missense | C | A | C | novel | C | C | 2099C > A | R539S | |
| CPT1C | 19 | 50203981 | Missense | G | A | G | novel | G | G | 694G > A | A108T | |
| PIK3CA | 3 | 178952085 | Missense | A | A | T | rs121913279 | A | A | 3297A > T | H1047L | |
| PDHA2 | 4 | 96761551 | Missense | T | C | T | novel | T | T | 313 T > C | F84L | |
| TKCC-07 | None detected | |||||||||||
| TKCC-09 | AKT3 | 1 | 243736250 | Missense | T | C | T | novel | T | T | 863 T > C | K266R |
| YME1L1 | 10 | 27437884 | Missense | T | G | T | novel | T | T | 301 T > G | Q40P | |
| ADCK4 | 19 | 41208536 | Missense | G | A | A | novel | G | G | 1164G > A | R288C | |
| TKCC-10 | None detected | |||||||||||
| TKCC-15-LO | MTCP1 | X | 154293944 | Missense | G | A | G | novel | G | G | G > A | R76C |
| TKCC-16-LO | HMGCL | 1 | 24143254 | Missense | C | A | C | novel | C | C | 303C > A | D87Y |
| ADCK4 | 19 | 41198257 | Missense | C | C | G | novel | C | C | 1620C > G | E440Q | |
| AGXT2 | 5 | 35013131 | Silent | C | C | T | novel | C | C | 1317C > T | A327A | |
| TKCC-17-LO | TP53 | 17 | 7578553 | Splice Site | T | C | C | novel | T | T | 377 T > C | Y126C |
| TKCC-18-LO | TARS2 | 1 | 150477113 | Missense | C | C | T | novel | C | C | C > T | A575V |
| TKCC-19-LO | None detected | |||||||||||
| TKCC-26-LO | LDHB | 12 | 21788484 | Missense | C | A | C | novel | C | C | C > A | D333Y |
| ADSL | 22 | 40676075 | Silent | G | A | G | novel | G | G | G > A |
Fig. 2Metabolic profile of TKCC and normal HPDE pancreatic cell lines. Basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) during mitochondrial stress test using Seahorse analyser (data presented as mean +/− s.d., n = 5)
Fig. 3Metabolomics analysis of pancreatic cancer PDCLs. a Partial least squares discrimination analysis (PLS-DA) of metabolomics profiles from all pancreatic cell lines (normal and PDCL) used in this study. b Relative intracellular metabolite levels for 13 pancreatic PDCLs and normal HPDE pancreatic cell line grown in two different media (K-SFM and M199/F12). Colour key (top right) is superimposed by a histogram showing counts of all identified metabolites (Z-score). Rows list the identified metabolite names, and columns list the pancreatic cell lines arranged according to hierarchical clustering analysis. c Heirarchical clustering analysis of changes in intracellular metabolite levels for 13 pancreatic PDCLs relative to HPDE normal cells (in K-SFM media). Fold change of metabolites with significantly different levels by ANOVA (p < 0.05) are shown. d Succinate abundance in PDCLs and HPDE (normalised to protein content)
Fig. 4Metabolic pathway flux analysis: a. Heirarchical clustering of significantly altered metabolic pathways (ANOVA, p < 0.05) in 13 PDCLs relative to normal HPDE cells (in K-SFM media), identified by PAPi analysis. Various culture media are represented by colours along the top of columns (grey = M199/F12, green = RPMI, purple = HPAC modified, red = IMDM). b Conversion of glutamine to lipid by 14C glutamine tracing in PDCLs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. c Metabolomics data are consistent with the activation of reductive carboxylation in pancreatic tumours, driving conversion of glutamine to lipid in the presence of low oxygen and ETC inhibition
Fig. 5Proposed convergence model of mtDNA mutations driving metabolic adaptation in pancreatic cancer. We propose a model in which the underlying nuclear genomic landscape of pancreatic cancer cells induces a metabolic challenge. As an adaptation to increased biosynthetic requirements, tumours attenuate oxidative phosphorylation through positive selection for diverse somatic mitochondrial mutations, which converge on common metabolic phenotypes