Literature DB >> 28163819

A Comparison of Fuzzy Clustering Approaches for Quantification of Microarray Gene Expression.

Yu-Ping Wang1, Maheswar Gunampally1, Jie Chen2, Douglas Bittel3, Merlin G Butler3, Wei-Wen Cai4.   

Abstract

Despite the widespread application of microarray imaging for biomedical imaging research, barriers still exist regarding its reliability for clinical use. A critical major problem lies in accurate spot segmentation and the quantification of gene expression level (mRNA) from the microarray images. A variety of commercial and research freeware packages are available, but most cannot handle array spots with complex shapes such as donuts and scratches. Clustering approaches such as k-means and mixture models were introduced to overcome this difficulty, which use the hard labeling of each pixel. In this paper, we apply fuzzy clustering approaches for spot segmentation, which provides soft labeling of the pixel. We compare several fuzzy clustering approaches for microarray analysis and provide a comprehensive study of these approaches for spot segmentation. We show that possiblistic c-means clustering (PCM) provides the best performance in terms of stability criterion when testing on both a variety of simulated and real microarray images. In addition, we compared three statistical criteria in measuring gene expression levels and show that a new asymptotically unbiased statistic is able to quantify the gene expression level more accurately.

Keywords:  fuzzy clustering; image segmentation; microarray; microarray gridding; segmentation

Year:  2007        PMID: 28163819      PMCID: PMC5286559          DOI: 10.1007/s11265-007-0123-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Signal Process Syst        ISSN: 1939-8115


  18 in total

1.  A model for measurement error for gene expression arrays.

Authors:  D M Rocke; B Durbin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain; Taku A Tokuyasu; Antoine M Snijders; Richard Segraves; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  An automatic block and spot indexing with k-nearest neighbors graph for microarray image analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Youl Jung; Hwan-Gue Cho
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Fuzzy C-means method for clustering microarray data.

Authors:  Doulaye Dembélé; Philippe Kastner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Intensity-based segmentation of microarray images.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Methods for automatic microarray image segmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Katzer; Franz Kummert; Gerhard Sagerer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Reliability analysis of microarray data using fuzzy c-means and normal mixture modeling based classification methods.

Authors:  Musa H Asyali; Musa Alci
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Donuts, scratches and blanks: robust model-based segmentation of microarray images.

Authors:  Qunhua Li; Chris Fraley; Roger E Bumgarner; Ka Yee Yeung; Adrian E Raftery
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images.

Authors:  Y Chen; E R Dougherty; M L Bittner
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays.

Authors:  Wei-Wen Cai; Jian-Hua Mao; Chi-Wen Chow; Shamsha Damani; Allan Balmain; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 54.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.