Literature DB >> 28162877

Humeral version in reverse shoulder arthroplasty affects impingement in activities of daily living.

Andreas Kontaxis1, Xiang Chen2, Julien Berhouet3, Daniel Choi2, Timothy Wright2, David M Dines4, Russell F Warren4, Lawrence V Gulotta4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impingement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been correlated with implant design and surgical techniques. Previous studies suggested that humeral retroversion can reduce impingement and increase external rotation range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to determine how humeral version affects impingement in activities of daily living (ADLs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single surgeon performed virtual RSA on 30 arthritic shoulders that were reconstructed from preoperative computed tomography scans. For each subject, the humeral component was placed into 5 versions: -40°,-20°, 0°, +20°, and +40° (- indicates retroversion, + indicates anteversion). Intra-articular and extra-articular impingement was calculated for 10 ADLs. Impingement-free ROM was also calculated for abduction, forward flexion, scapula plane elevation, and internal/external rotation (standardized tests). Risk of impingement for ADLs was assessed as the collective duration and frequency of impingement across all motions. Frequent impingement sites were identified.
RESULTS: For the ADLs, 0° version showed the least amount of impingement. In contrast, 40° retroversion resulted in the largest ROM for the standardized tests (118° ± 19° abduction, 109° ± 16° forward flexion, 111° ± 10° scapula plane elevation, 140° ± 15° internal/external rotation). The site of impingement changed with version: retroversion increased the extra-articular impingement, and anteversion increased the contact between the inferior glenoid and the humeral cup.
CONCLUSIONS: Humeral version can significantly affect impingement in RSA. Maximizing ROM in standardized tests may not reduce the risk of impingement during ADLs. Our results showed that an average 0° of version should be preferred, but the large variability among subjects suggested that optimum version may vary among individuals.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; activities of daily living; bone notches; contact detection; glenoid component positioning; humeral version; impingement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28162877     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Manuel Urvoy; Patric Raiss; Jean-David Werthel; Doruk Akgün; Jean Chaoui; Paul Siegert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  A comparison of patient-specific instrumentation to navigation for conducting humeral head osteotomies during shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph Cavanagh; Jason Lockhart; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bettina Hochreiter; Anita Hasler; Julian Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Paul Borbas; Christian Gerber
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 5.  Does Humeral Component Version Affect Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shivan S Jassim; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Eugene T Ek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.