Meghan Miller1, Ana-Maria Iosif2, Monique Hill3, Gregory S Young3, A J Schwichtenberg4, Sally Ozonoff3. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, CA. Electronic address: mrhmiller@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, CA. 4. Departments of Human Development and Family Studies, Psychological Sciences, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine longitudinal patterns of response to name from 6-24 months of age in infants at high and low risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). STUDY DESIGN: A response to name task was tested at 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months of age in 156 infant siblings of children with ASD (high-risk) or typical development (low-risk). At 36 months of age, participants were classified into 1 of 3 outcome groups: group with ASD (n = 20), high-risk group without ASD (n = 76), or low-risk group without ASD (n = 60). Differences in longitudinal performance were assessed using generalized estimating equations, and sensitivity and specificity for identifying ASD were calculated. Differences in age 36-month functioning were examined between infants who developed ASD and repeatedly vs infrequently failed to respond to name. RESULTS: At 9 months of age, infants developing ASD were more likely to fail to orient to their names, persisting through 24 months. Sensitivity/specificity for identifying ASD based on at least 1 failure between 12 and 24 months were estimated at .70 in this sample. One-half of the infants who developed ASD had repeated failures in this timeframe, and demonstrated lower age 36-month receptive language, and earlier diagnosis of ASD than infants with ASD who had infrequent failures. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to recommended routine broad-based and ASD-specific screening, response to name should be regularly monitored in infants at risk for ASD. Infants who consistently fail to respond to their names in the second year of life may be at risk not only for ASD but also for greater impairment by age 3 years.
OBJECTIVE: To examine longitudinal patterns of response to name from 6-24 months of age in infants at high and low risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). STUDY DESIGN: A response to name task was tested at 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months of age in 156 infant siblings of children with ASD (high-risk) or typical development (low-risk). At 36 months of age, participants were classified into 1 of 3 outcome groups: group with ASD (n = 20), high-risk group without ASD (n = 76), or low-risk group without ASD (n = 60). Differences in longitudinal performance were assessed using generalized estimating equations, and sensitivity and specificity for identifying ASD were calculated. Differences in age 36-month functioning were examined between infants who developed ASD and repeatedly vs infrequently failed to respond to name. RESULTS: At 9 months of age, infants developing ASD were more likely to fail to orient to their names, persisting through 24 months. Sensitivity/specificity for identifying ASD based on at least 1 failure between 12 and 24 months were estimated at .70 in this sample. One-half of the infants who developed ASD had repeated failures in this timeframe, and demonstrated lower age 36-month receptive language, and earlier diagnosis of ASD than infants with ASD who had infrequent failures. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to recommended routine broad-based and ASD-specific screening, response to name should be regularly monitored in infants at risk for ASD. Infants who consistently fail to respond to their names in the second year of life may be at risk not only for ASD but also for greater impairment by age 3 years.
Authors: Dajie Zhang; Laura Roche; Katrin D Bartl-Pokorny; Magdalena Krieber; Laurie McLay; Sven Bölte; Luise Poustka; Jeff Sigafoos; Markus Gugatschka; Christa Einspieler; Peter B Marschik Journal: Res Dev Disabil Date: 2018-04-12
Authors: Meghan R Swanson; Kevin Donovan; Sarah Paterson; Jason J Wolff; Julia Parish-Morris; Shoba S Meera; Linda R Watson; Annette M Estes; Natasha Marrus; Jed T Elison; Mark D Shen; Heidi B McNeilly; Leigh MacIntyre; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Tanya St John; Kelly Botteron; Stephen Dager; Joseph Piven Journal: Autism Res Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Isabella C Stallworthy; Carolyn Lasch; Daniel Berry; Jason J Wolff; John R Pruett; Natasha Marrus; Meghan R Swanson; Kelly N Botteron; Stephen R Dager; Annette M Estes; Heather C Hazlett; Robert T Schultz; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Joseph Piven; Jed T Elison Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Moira L Pileggi; Natalie Brane; Jessica Bradshaw; Abigail Delehanty; Taylor Day; Courtney McCracken; Jennifer Stapel-Wax; Amy M Wetherby Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 2.408