Literature DB >> 28161809

Alteration of Cardiac Deformation in Acute Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients.

Nitin Chanana1, Charlotte S Van Dorn2, Melanie D Everitt3, Hsin Yi Weng4, Dylan V Miller5, Shaji C Menon6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess changes in cardiac deformation during acute cellular- and antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric HT recipients. Pediatric HT recipients aged ≤18 years with at least one episode of biopsy-diagnosed rejection from 2006 to 2013 were included. Left ventricular systolic S (SS) and SR (SSr) data were acquired using 2D speckle tracking on echocardiograms obtained within 12 h of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. A mixed effect model was used to compare cardiac deformation during CR (Grade ≥ 1R), AMR (pAMR ≥ 2), and mixed rejection (CR and AMR positive) versus no rejection (Grade 0R and pAMR 0 or 1). A total of 20 subjects (10 males, 50%) with 71 rejection events (CR 35, 49%; AMR 21, 30% and mixed 15, 21%) met inclusion criteria. The median time from HT to first biopsy used for analysis was 5 months (IQR 0.25-192 months). Average LV longitudinal SS and SSr were reduced significantly during rejection (SS: -17.2 ± 3.4% vs. -10.7 ± 4.5%, p < 0.001 and SSr: -1.2 ± 0.2 s- 1 vs. -0.9 ± 0.3 s- 1; p < 0.001) and in all rejection types. Average LV short-axis radial SS was reduced only in CR compared to no rejection (p = 0.04), while average LV circumferential SS and SSr were reduced significantly in AMR compared to CR (SS: 18.9 ± 4.2% vs. 20.8 ± 8.8%, p = 0.03 and SSr: 1.35 ± 0.8 s- 1 vs. 1.54 ± 0.9 s- 1; p = 0.03). In pediatric HT recipients, LV longitudinal SS and SSr were reduced in all rejection types, while LV radial SS was reduced only in CR. LV circumferential SS and SSr further differentiated between CR and AMR with a significant reduction seen in AMR as compared to CR. This novel finding suggests mechanistic differences between AMR- and CR-induced myocardial injury which may be useful in non-invasively predicting the type of rejection in pediatric HT recipients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric heart transplant; Rejection; Systolic strain; Systolic strain rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161809     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1567-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  28 in total

1.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

Authors:  Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  The potential clinical role of ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Anna Marciniak; Elif Eroglu; Maciej Marciniak; Cristina Sirbu; Lieven Herbots; Walter Droogne; Piet Claus; Jan D'hooge; Bart Bijnens; Johan Vanhaecke; George R Sutherland
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-05-23

3.  The use of Doppler tissue imaging to predict cellular and antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Sarina K Behera; Janet Trang; Brian T Feeley; Daniel S Levi; Juan C Alejos; Stacey Drant
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2008-03

4.  The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Working Formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Claus Andersen; Patrick Bruneval; Marny Fedrigo; Michael C Fishbein; Martin Goddard; Elizabeth H Hammond; Ornella Leone; Charles Marboe; Dylan Miller; Desley Neil; Doris Rassl; Monica P Revelo; Alexandra Rice; E Rene Rodriguez; Susan Stewart; Carmela D Tan; Gayle L Winters; Lori West; Mandeep R Mehra; Annalisa Angelini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Noninvasive detection of allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients by use of Doppler tissue imaging.

Authors:  J A Puleo; J M Aranda; M W Weston; G Cintrón; M French; L Clark; H L Fontanet
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Left ventricular longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography is associated with treatment-requiring cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Fusako Sera; Tomoko S Kato; Maryjane Farr; Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Charles C Marboe; Marco R Di Tullio; Donna Mancini; Shunichi Homma
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Usefulness of Two-Dimensional Strain Parameters to Diagnose Acute Rejection after Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Susana Mingo-Santos; Vanessa Moñivas-Palomero; Inés Garcia-Lunar; Cristina D Mitroi; Josebe Goirigolzarri-Artaza; Betsaida Rivero; Juan F Oteo; Evaristo Castedo; Jesús González-Mirelis; Miguel A Cavero; Manuel Gómez-Bueno; Javier Segovia; Luis Alonso-Pulpón
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Cost-effectiveness of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy after 12 months post-heart transplantation.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Michael A Shullo; Jonathan Holtz; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 8.790

9.  A 25-year experience of endomyocardial biopsy safety in infants.

Authors:  Derek Zhorne; Christopher J Petit; Frank F Ing; Henri Justino; John L Jefferies; William J Dreyer; Debra Kearney; Matthew A Crystal
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; James E Fildes; Simon G Ray; Helen Doran; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Matthias Schmitt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance with regadenoson stress perfusion is safe following pediatric heart transplantation and identifies history of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Nazia Husain; Kae Watanabe; Haben Berhane; Aditi Gupta; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.364

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.