Literature DB >> 28160873

Eighteen Months of Treatment With Subcutaneous Abaloparatide Followed by 6 Months of Treatment With Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Results of the ACTIVExtend Trial.

Felicia Cosman1, Paul D Miller2, Gregory C Williams3, Gary Hattersley3, Ming-Yi Hu3, Ivo Valter4, Lorraine A Fitzpatrick3, Bente Juel Riis5, Claus Christiansen5, John P Bilezikian6, Dennis Black7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 18 months of subcutaneous abaloparatide (ABL-SC) or placebo (PBO) followed by 6 months of alendronate (ALN) (preplanned interim analysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ACTIVExtend, an extension of ACTIVE, enrolled patients who completed 18 months of ABL-SC or PBO in ACTIVE to receive up to 24 additional months of open-label ALN; there was 1 month between the studies to re-consent patients.
RESULTS: Of 1243 eligible ACTIVE patients, 1139 (92%) were enrolled in ACTIVExtend beginning November 20, 2012. These results are from a prespecified 6-month interim analysis (cutoff date, June 2, 2015); the study is ongoing. Findings indicated percentages of patients with new morphometric vertebral fractures: PBO/ALN, 4.4% vs ABL-SC/ALN, 0.55%; relative risk reduction, 87% (relative risk, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.41; P<.001). Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of nonvertebral fractures were PBO/ALN, 5.6% vs ABL-SC/ALN, 2.7%; risk reduction, 52% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89; log-rank P=.02). There was also a 58% risk reduction of major osteoporotic fractures (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85; log-rank P=.01) and a 45% risk reduction of clinical fractures (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.92; log-rank P=.02) in the ABL-SC/ALN group vs the PBO/ALN group. At 25 months, bone mineral density percentage change from ACTIVE baseline for ABL-SC/ALN vs PBO/ALN was as follows: lumbar spine, 12.8%; total hip, 5.5%; femoral neck, 4.5% vs 3.5%, 1.4%, 0.5%, respectively (group differences at all sites P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Use of ABL-SC for 18 months followed by ALN for 6 months improved bone mineral density and reduced fracture risk throughout the skeleton and may be an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01657162.
Copyright © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28160873     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  32 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Abaloparatide: First Global Approval.

Authors:  Matt Shirley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Osteoporosis in 2017: Addressing the crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Christian Roux; Karine Briot
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Novel anabolic treatments for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 9.  Anabolic Agents for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: How Do You Choose?

Authors:  Felicia Cosman; David W Dempster
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Ablation of Fat Cells in Adult Mice Induces Massive Bone Gain.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Nidhi Rohatgi; Jonathan R Brestoff; Yongjia Li; Ruteja A Barve; Eric Tycksen; Yung Kim; Matthew J Silva; Steven L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.