| Literature DB >> 28160774 |
Jieying Qian1, Yong Liu2, Naixia Chao1, Chengtong Ma1, Qicong Chen1, Jian Sun1, Yaosheng Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPS) belongs to the short-chain prenyltransferase family, and it performs a conserved and essential role in the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway. However, its classification, evolutionary history, and the forces driving the evolution of FPS genes in plants remain poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: Biological evolution; Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase; Positive selection; Terpenoid biosynthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28160774 PMCID: PMC5292144 DOI: 10.1186/s12867-017-0081-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Mol Biol ISSN: 1471-2199 Impact factor: 2.946
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of terrestrial plant FPS. The phylogenetic tree of plant FPSs was constructed through the Bayesian analyses. Posterior probabilities are labeled above branches. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CrFPS) and Huperzia serrate (HsFPS) were used as outgroups. The clades of gymnosperms, monocotyledons and dicotyledons were labeled as A, B and C, respectively. The numbers indicate the Bayesian probabilities for each phylogenetic clade. Posterior probability values were to only show the pp values smaller than 1.0 with the tree
Positive selection sites of FPS tested through the site model, branch model and branch-site model
| Model | Estimate of parameters | lnL | LRT pairs | df | 2ΔlnL |
| Positive selection sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| M0:one ratio | ω = 0.11676 | −30867.39 | |||||
| M3:discrete | p0 = 0.49134, p1 = 0.296497, p2 = 0.21217, ω0 = 0.01740, ω1 = 0.15430, ω2 = 0.50703 | −29509.88 | M0/M3 | 3 | 2715.02 | 0 | none |
| M1a:neutral | p0 = 0.75883, p1 = 0.24117, ω0 = 0.07661, ω1 = 1.00000 | −30122.51 | M1a/M2a | 2 | 0 | 1 | none |
| M2a:selection | p0 = 0.75883, p1 = 0.15391, p2 = 0.08726, ω0 = 0.07661, ω1 = 1.0000, ω2 = 1.0000 | −30122.51 | |||||
| M7:beta | p = 0.37262, q = 1.74173 | −29440.75 | |||||
| M8:beta&ω | p0 = 1.0000, p = 0.28555, q = 1.02636, (p1 = 0.00000), ω2 = 2.36785 | −34114.08 | M7/M8 | 2 | 9346.66 | 0 | 3D, 7R, 14V, 21N, 25F, 27F, 34W, 47K, 59K, 60L, 65K, 98S, 99S, 181P, 207S, 213K, 233D, 293E, 275F, 286A, 251D, 252I, 270E, 302D, 305A, 309S, 336G, 342Q (all werea) |
|
| |||||||
| Model 0:(one-ratio) | ω = 0.11676 | −30867.39 | M0/Free model | 135 | 258.64 | 0 | none |
| Free model | ωa = 1.0131, ωb = 1.3249, ωc = 540.6926 | −30738.07 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| BSa1 | p0 = 0.00006, p1 = 0.00001, p2a = 0.85238, p2b = 0.14755, b:ω0 = 0.07506, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 0.07506, ω2b = 1.00000, f:ω0 = 0.07506, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 1.00000, ω2b = 1.00000 | −25664.61 | BSa1/BSa0-fix | 1 | 10.56 | 0 | 98S, 148D, 234D |
| BSa0_fix | p0 = 0.81966, p1 = 0.14204, p2a = 0.03264, p2b = 0.00566, b:ω0 = 0.07521, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 0.07521, ω2b = 1.00000, f:ω0 = 0.07521, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 1.00000, ω2b = 1.00000 | −25669.89 | none | ||||
| BSb1 | p0 = 0.02224, p1 = 0.00386, p2a = 0.82997, p2b = 0.14393, b:ω0 = 0.07528, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 0.07528, ω2b = 1.00000,f:ω0 = 0.07528, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 1.00000, ω2b = 1.00000 | −25663.83 | BSb1/BSb0-fix | 1 | 10.12 | 0 | none |
| BSb0_fix | p0 = 0.10932, p1 = 0.01896, p2a = 0.74286, p2b = 0.12886, b:ω0 = 0.07528, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 0.07528, ω2b = 1.00000, f:ω0 = 0.07528, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 8.15518, ω2b = 8.15518, f:ω0 = 0.07528, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 8.15518, ω2b = 8.15518 | −25668.89 | |||||
| BSc1 | p0 = 0.03778, p1 = 0.00655, p2a = 0.81443, p2b = 0.14124, b:ω0 = 0.07526,ω1 = 1.00000,ω2a = 0.07526,ω2b = 1.00000, f:ω0 = 0.07526, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 1.00000, ω2b = 8.15518 | −25664.75 | BSc1/BSc0-fix | 1 | 9.98 | 0 | none |
| Sc0_fix | p0 = 0.01751, p1 = 0.00303, p2a = 0.83486, p2b = 0.14461, b:ω0 = 0.07526, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 0.07526, ω2b = 1.00000, f:ω0 = 0.07526, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2a = 1.00000, ω2b = 1.00000 | −25669.74 | |||||
Selection analysis by site model was performed using CodeML implemented in PAML. Significant tests at 1% cut off
lnL log-likelihood values, LRT likelihood ratio test, ω2 average dN/dS ratio for sites subject to positive selection, p and q shape parameters for the beta distribution of ω, p0, p1, and p2 proportions of codons subject to purifying selection, neutral evolution, and positive selection, respectively, df degrees of freedom, 2ΔlnL twice the log-likelihood difference of the model compared
a Posterior probability >99%
Fig. 2Multi-alignment of the amino acid sequences of partial terrestrial plant FPS. PnFPS, PgFPS, EsFPS, PqFPS, and GpFPS represent farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase cloned from Panax notoginseng, Panax ginseng, Eleutherococcus senticosus, Panax quinquefolium, and Gynostemma pentaphyllum, respectively. The positive selection sites for FPS in the above five common medicinal plants were marked and displayed through GeneDoc (http://www.nrbsc.org/gfx/genedoc). PnFPS was used as the reference sequence. The conserved sites were shaded. Hash symbol positive selection site; red box conserved sites of trans-isoprenyl diphosphate synthases (Trans IPPS); carmine box active site lid residues
Fig. 3Positive selection sites (red) and functional sites (blue) displaying on the FPS 3D structure by PYMOL software version 1.5. a Involved in the N-myristoylation site; b involved in the protein kinase C phosphorylation site; c involved in chemical binding site; d involved in active site lid residues; e positive selection sites identified by the branch-site model; f involved in substrate-Mg2+ binding site