Jamie L Hanson1,2, Wouter van den Bos3, Barbara J Roeber2, Karen D Rudolph4, Richard J Davidson1,2, Seth D Pollak1,2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. 2. Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children who experience early adversity often develop emotion regulatory problems, but little is known about the mechanisms that mediate this relation. We tested whether general associative learning processes contribute to associations between adversity, in the form of child maltreatment, and negative behavioral outcomes. METHODS: Eighty-one participants between 12 and 17 years of age were recruited for this study and completed a probabilistic learning Task. Forty-one of these participants had been exposed to physical abuse, a form of early adversity. Forty additional participants without any known history of maltreatment served as a comparison group. All participants (and their parents) also completed portions of the Youth Life Stress Interview to understand adolescent's behavior. We calculated measures of associative learning, and also constructed mathematical models of learning. RESULTS: We found that adolescents exposed to high levels of adversity early in their lives had lower levels of associative learning than comparison adolescents. In addition, we found that impaired associative learning partially explained the higher levels of behavioral problems among youth who suffered early adversity. Using mathematical models, we also found that two components of learning were specifically affected in children exposed to adversity: choice variability and biases in their beliefs about the likelihood of rewards in the environment. CONCLUSIONS: Participants who had been exposed to early adversity were less able than their peers to correctly learn which stimuli were likely to result in reward, even after repeated feedback. These individuals also used information about known rewards in their environments less often. In addition, individuals exposed to adversity made decisions early in the learning process as if rewards were less consistent and occurred more at random. These data suggest one mechanism through which early life experience shapes behavioral development.
BACKGROUND:Children who experience early adversity often develop emotion regulatory problems, but little is known about the mechanisms that mediate this relation. We tested whether general associative learning processes contribute to associations between adversity, in the form of child maltreatment, and negative behavioral outcomes. METHODS: Eighty-one participants between 12 and 17 years of age were recruited for this study and completed a probabilistic learning Task. Forty-one of these participants had been exposed to physical abuse, a form of early adversity. Forty additional participants without any known history of maltreatment served as a comparison group. All participants (and their parents) also completed portions of the Youth Life Stress Interview to understand adolescent's behavior. We calculated measures of associative learning, and also constructed mathematical models of learning. RESULTS: We found that adolescents exposed to high levels of adversity early in their lives had lower levels of associative learning than comparison adolescents. In addition, we found that impaired associative learning partially explained the higher levels of behavioral problems among youth who suffered early adversity. Using mathematical models, we also found that two components of learning were specifically affected in children exposed to adversity: choice variability and biases in their beliefs about the likelihood of rewards in the environment. CONCLUSIONS:Participants who had been exposed to early adversity were less able than their peers to correctly learn which stimuli were likely to result in reward, even after repeated feedback. These individuals also used information about known rewards in their environments less often. In addition, individuals exposed to adversity made decisions early in the learning process as if rewards were less consistent and occurred more at random. These data suggest one mechanism through which early life experience shapes behavioral development.
Authors: Jamie L Hanson; Dustin Albert; Anne-Marie R Iselin; Justin M Carré; Kenneth A Dodge; Ahmad R Hariri Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Sven C Mueller; Michael G Hardin; Katherine Korelitz; Teresa Daniele; Jessica Bemis; Mary Dozier; Elizabeth Peloso; Francoise S Maheu; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2012-03-15
Authors: Johanna M Jarcho; Hannah Y Grossman; Amanda E Guyer; Megan Quarmley; Ashley R Smith; Nathan A Fox; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Eric E Nelson Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2019-07
Authors: Madeline B Harms; Rasmus Birn; Nadine Provencal; Tobias Wiechmann; Elisabeth B Binder; Sebastian W Giakas; Barbara J Roeber; Seth D Pollak Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2017-12
Authors: Andrew M Novick; Mateus L Levandowski; Laura E Laumann; Noah S Philip; Lawrence H Price; Audrey R Tyrka Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Meg J Dennison; Maya L Rosen; Kelly A Sambrook; Jessica L Jenness; Margaret A Sheridan; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: Child Dev Date: 2017-12-21
Authors: Dylan G Gee; Kevin G Bath; Carolyn M Johnson; Heidi C Meyer; Vishnu P Murty; Wouter van den Bos; Catherine A Hartley Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Andrea Fields; Paul A Bloom; Michelle VanTieghem; Chelsea Harmon; Tricia Choy; Nicolas L Camacho; Lisa Gibson; Rebecca Umbach; Charlotte Heleniak; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2021-05-26