David D Vachon1, Robert F Krueger2, Fred A Rogosch3, Dante Cicchetti4. 1. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 3. Mount Hope Family Center, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 4. Mount Hope Family Center, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York4Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Several widely held beliefs about child abuse and neglect may be incorrect. It is most commonly assumed that some forms of abuse (eg, physical and sexual abuse) are more harmful than others (eg, emotional abuse and neglect); other assumptions are that each form of abuse has specific consequences and that the effects of abuse differ across sex and race. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether widely held assumptions about child abuse and neglect are valid by testing the hypothesis that different types of child maltreatment (CM) actually have equivalent, broad, and universal effects. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study assessed 2292 racially and ethnically diverse boys (1254 [54.7%]) and girls (1038 [45.3%]) aged 5 to 13 years (mean [SD] age, 9.0 [2.0] years) who attended a research summer camp program for low-income, school-aged children from July 1, 1986, to August 15, 2012. Of these children, 1193 (52.1%) had a well-documented history of maltreatment. Analysis was conducted from September 25, 2013, to June 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Various forms of internalizing and externalizing personality and psychopathologic traits were assessed using multiple informant ratings on the California Child Q-Set and Teacher Report Form as well as child self-reported depression and peer ratings of aggression and disruptive behavior. RESULTS: Structural analysis showed that different forms of CM have equivalent psychiatric and behavioral effects, ranging from anxiety and depression to rule-breaking and aggression. We also found that nonsexual CM alters 2 broad vulnerability factors, internalizing (β = 0.185; SE = 0.028; P < .001) and externalizing (β = 0.283; SE = 0.023; P < .001), that underlie multiple forms of psychiatric and behavioral disturbance. We show that CM has comparable consequences for boys and girls of different races, and our results allowed us to describe a base rate and co-occurrence issue that makes it difficult to identify the unique effects of child sexual abuse. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings challenge widely held beliefs about how child abuse should be recognized and treated-a responsibility that often lies with the physician. Because different types of child abuse have equivalent, broad, and universal effects, effective treatments for maltreatment of any sort are likely to have comprehensive psychological benefits. Population-level prevention and intervention strategies should emphasize emotional abuse, which occurs with high frequency but is less punishable than other types of child maltreatment.
IMPORTANCE: Several widely held beliefs about child abuse and neglect may be incorrect. It is most commonly assumed that some forms of abuse (eg, physical and sexual abuse) are more harmful than others (eg, emotional abuse and neglect); other assumptions are that each form of abuse has specific consequences and that the effects of abuse differ across sex and race. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether widely held assumptions about child abuse and neglect are valid by testing the hypothesis that different types of child maltreatment (CM) actually have equivalent, broad, and universal effects. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study assessed 2292 racially and ethnically diverse boys (1254 [54.7%]) and girls (1038 [45.3%]) aged 5 to 13 years (mean [SD] age, 9.0 [2.0] years) who attended a research summer camp program for low-income, school-aged children from July 1, 1986, to August 15, 2012. Of these children, 1193 (52.1%) had a well-documented history of maltreatment. Analysis was conducted from September 25, 2013, to June 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Various forms of internalizing and externalizing personality and psychopathologic traits were assessed using multiple informant ratings on the California Child Q-Set and Teacher Report Form as well as child self-reported depression and peer ratings of aggression and disruptive behavior. RESULTS: Structural analysis showed that different forms of CM have equivalent psychiatric and behavioral effects, ranging from anxiety and depression to rule-breaking and aggression. We also found that nonsexual CM alters 2 broad vulnerability factors, internalizing (β = 0.185; SE = 0.028; P < .001) and externalizing (β = 0.283; SE = 0.023; P < .001), that underlie multiple forms of psychiatric and behavioral disturbance. We show that CM has comparable consequences for boys and girls of different races, and our results allowed us to describe a base rate and co-occurrence issue that makes it difficult to identify the unique effects of childsexual abuse. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings challenge widely held beliefs about how child abuse should be recognized and treated-a responsibility that often lies with the physician. Because different types of child abuse have equivalent, broad, and universal effects, effective treatments for maltreatment of any sort are likely to have comprehensive psychological benefits. Population-level prevention and intervention strategies should emphasize emotional abuse, which occurs with high frequency but is less punishable than other types of child maltreatment.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Katie A McLaughlin; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ali Obaid Alhamzawi; Jordi Alonso; Matthias Angermeyer; Corina Benjet; Evelyn Bromet; Somnath Chatterji; Giovanni de Girolamo; Koen Demyttenaere; John Fayyad; Silvia Florescu; Gilad Gal; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Chi-Yi Hu; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Sing Lee; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Johan Ormel; José Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Adley Tsang; T Bedirhan Ustün; Svetlozar Vassilev; Maria Carmen Viana; David R Williams Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Ethan Kross; Marc G Berman; Walter Mischel; Edward E Smith; Tor D Wager Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jennifer Greif Green; Katie A McLaughlin; Patricia A Berglund; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-02
Authors: Rosana E Norman; Munkhtsetseg Byambaa; Rumna De; Alexander Butchart; James Scott; Theo Vos Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: David Reiss; Lisbeth Nielsen; Keith Godfrey; Bruce McEwen; Christine Power; Teresa Seeman; Stephen Suomi Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Jamie L Hanson; Wouter van den Bos; Barbara J Roeber; Karen D Rudolph; Richard J Davidson; Seth D Pollak Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Jordan E DeVylder; Courtney Cogburn; Hans Y Oh; Deidre Anglin; Melissa Edmondson Smith; Tanya Sharpe; Hyun-Jin Jun; Jason Schiffman; Ellen Lukens; Bruce Link Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: G Bandoli; L Campbell-Sills; R C Kessler; S G Heeringa; M K Nock; A J Rosellini; N A Sampson; M Schoenbaum; R J Ursano; M B Stein Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 7.723