| Literature DB >> 28155867 |
Chai K Lim1,2, Ayse Bilgin3, David B Lovejoy1, Vanessa Tan1, Sonia Bustamante4, Bruce V Taylor5, Alban Bessede6, Bruce J Brew7,8, Gilles J Guillemin1,7.
Abstract
Activation of the kynurenine pathway (KP) of tryptophan metabolism results from chronic inflammation and is known to exacerbate progression of neurodegenerative disease. To gain insights into the links between inflammation, the KP and multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis, we investigated the KP metabolomics profile of MS patients. Most significantly, we found aberrant levels of two key KP metabolites, kynurenic acid (KA) and quinolinic acid (QA). The balance between these metabolites is important as it determines overall excitotoxic activity at the N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor. We also identified that serum KP metabolic signatures in patients can discriminate clinical MS subtypes with high sensitivity and specificity. A C5.0 Decision Tree classification model discriminated the clinical subtypes of MS with a sensitivity of 91%. After validation in another independent cohort, sensitivity was maintained at 85%. Collectively, our studies suggest that abnormalities in the KP may be associated with the switch from early-mild stage MS to debilitating progressive forms of MS and that analysis of KP metabolites in MS patient serum may have application as MS disease biomarkers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28155867 PMCID: PMC5290739 DOI: 10.1038/srep41473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics of Cohort 1, 2 and 3.
| RRMS | SPMS | PPMS | HC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, n | 50 | 20 | 17 | 49 |
| Female sex, n(%) | 30 (60.0) | 15 (75.0) | 13 (76.5) | 35 (71.4) |
| Age in years, mean ( | 43.4 (9.4) | 53.45 (9.7) | 52.24 (8.8) | 45.29 (11.7) |
| Disease duration in year, mean ( | 6.92 (5.9) | 16.5 (4.4) | 16.18 (5.4) | N/A |
| Severity, EDSS, median (quartiles)B* | 2.0 (1.5, 3.4) | 6.0 (3.4, 6.5) | 5.5 (2.5, 6.0) | N/A |
| Cohort 2, n | 44 | 15 | ||
| Female sex, n(%) | 32 (72.7) | 7 (46.7) | ||
| Age in years, mean ( | 47.8 (10.1) 49.4 (10.2) | 59.4 (10.7) 61.5 (10.7) | ||
| Disease duration in year, mean ( | 8.73 (8.4) 10.3 (8.4) | 18.2 (9.7) 20.3 (9.9) | ||
| Severity, EDSS, mean ( | 3.7 (1.9) 3.8 (2.0) | 6.8 (1.5) 6.9 (1.5) | ||
| Cohort 3, n | 9 | 20 | 6 | |
| Female sex, n(%) | 6 (66.7) | 14 (70.0) | 4 (66.7) | |
| Age in years, mean ( | 49.2 (16.0) | 49.7 (9.0) | 43.67 (11.8) |
Abbreviations: RRMS = Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS = secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS = primary progressive multiple sclerosis; HC = healthy controls; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; N/A = not applicable. SD = Standard deviation. AANOVA, Tukey HSD, BKruskal Wallis non-parametric test, *p < 0.001, indicating significant difference between RRMS and SPMS groups. Adjustment had been made accordingly in subsequent analysis.
Figure 1Overview of the kynurenine pathway with box plots of tryptophan (A), kynurenine (B), kynurenine/tryptophan (Kyn/Trp or K/T) ratio (C), kynurenic acid (D), quinolinic acid (E) NAD+ (F) and quinolinic acid/kynurenic acid (QA/KA) ratio (G) in healthy control (HC), relapsing-remitting MS (RR), secondary progressive MS (SP) and primary progressive MS (PP) cohorts. The diagram illustrate how inflammation can influence the pathway leading to enhance (blue arrows) in some downstream metabolites such as 3-Hydroxykynurenine (3-HK), Anthranilic acid (AA) and 3-Hydroxyanthranilic acid (3-HAA) but not others (red dotted arrows), i.e. kynurenic acid, picolinic acid and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) based on patients with MS when compared to healthy control. The aberrant KP change in MS can potentially lead to mood/behavioural and sleep abnormalities, excitotoxicity-induced neurodegeneration and energy depletion related to cognitive fatigue in MS.
Pearson correlation between KP variables, inflammatory mediators and MS severity (EDSS) scores in Cohort 1.
Table is presented as a heat map, with darker colors depicting the strength of the correlation.All values are expressed as log transformation of the original concentration except K/T Ratio and EDSS.
KP and Immune profile changes between baseline and 2 years follow-up in Cohort 2 patients with RRMS.
| Variables (n) | Baseline, median (quartiles) | Follow-up, median (quartiles) | Fold Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K/T ratio (44) | ||||
| RRMS | 54 (40, 65) | 57 (47, 71) | 0.06 | 0.029 |
| SPMS | 44 (39, 77) | 56 (38, 95) | 0.27 | >0.05 |
| IL-2 (24) | ||||
| RRMS | 17 (3, 41) | 4 (2, 11) | −0.76 | 0.011 |
| SPMS | 9 (2, 16) | 3 (1, 7) | −0.67 | >0.05 |
| IL-7 (40) | ||||
| RRMS | 13 (9, 19) | 18 (13, 25) | 0.38 | 0.024 |
| SPMS | 14 (11, 23) | 20 (14, 24) | 0.43 | >0.05 |
| MIP-1α (28) | ||||
| RRMS | 5 (4, 10) | 10 (5, 13) | 1.00 | 0.004 |
| SPMS | 10 (4, 12) | 9 (7, 12) | −0.10 | >0.05 |
| MIP-1β (41) | ||||
| RRMS | 37 (21, 71) | 69 (48, 90) | 0.86 | 0.001 |
| SPMS | 42 (28, 94) | 71 (48, 108) | 0.69 | >0.05 |
Wilcoxon signed ranks test was use and analyzed by disease group. Other variables measured that are not significant (i.e. p > 0.05) is not listed in the table. No significant changes were observed to any variables in the SPMS group over time. The EDSS was stable with little changes in both RRMS and SPMS shown in Table 1. Concentrations of all the inflammatory mediators are expressed in picogram per mililter (pg/ml).
Figure 2Biomarker for predicting MS severity using in silico approach.
(A) Classification modelling was based on exploratory analysis on the variables in the dataset with the shortlisted six predictors, i.e., QA, PA, KA, FGF-basic, TRP and TNF-α and its ranked importance for the predictive analytics. (B) Training Set using a C5.0 Decision Tree comprised of pie chart proportions of healthy control or MS subtype after being split by the six predictors. To optimize the split, calculated cut-off concentrations for each predictor were determined by the analytic software. The aim is to define a set of predictors that results in a full circle for each experimental group. For example, a QA concentration ≥494 nM (#) results in isolation of the SP and PP MS subtypes, then applying a PA concentration of <313 nM (#), as the next predictor, results in 89.1% isolation of the PP MS subtype. The experimental groups are denoted: healthy control (HC; green), RRMS (RR; yellow), SPMS (SP; orange) and PPMS (PP; red). (C) The numbers of observed and correctly predicted HC and MS subtype in the Training Set are shown (blue boxes) along with proportions of true (sensitivity) and false (specificity) predictions. (D) A different Test Set was used to validate the predictive model built from the Training Set. The numbers of observed and correctly predicted HC and MS subtype in the Test Set are shown (blue boxes) along with proportions of true (sensitivity) and false (specificity) predictions.
Relationship of CSF and Matching Serum KP Profile.
| CSF KP variables | Model (#) | Adjusted R2 | p value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRP | 1: TRP paired serum only | 0.3027 | 0.0004 | 51 |
| 3: TRP paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.3895 | 0.0073 | 52 | |
| KYN | 1: KYN paired serum only | 0.0938 | 0.0411 | −202 |
| 3: KYN paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.6142 | <0.0001 | −225 | |
| K/T Ratio | 1: K/T Ratio paired serum only | 0.2062 | 0.0036 | 243 |
| 3: K/T Ratio paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.4835 | 0.0008 | 233 | |
| KA | 1: KA paired serum only | 0.07 | 0.068 | 59 |
| 3: KA paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.3317 | 0.0178 | 54 | |
| PA | 1: PA paired serum only | 0.1593 | 0.01012 | 271 |
| 3: PA paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.3548 | 0.1262 | 268 | |
| QA | 1: QA paired serum only | 0.334 | 0.0002 | 274.8 |
| 3: QA paired serum stratified by clinical groups and adjusted for other KP variables | 0.4592 | 0.0021 | 274 |
Abbreviations: AIC = Akaike information criterion. Note that selection of the best model among the proposed 3 models for each KP metabolites was based on the smallest AIC values. Overall, model 2 across all CSF KP variables has the smallest AIC value and the best model to predict CSF KP variables.