Markku Laakso1, Johanna Kuusisto2. 1. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, 70210, Kuopio, Finland. markku.laakso@uef.fi. 2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the recent population-based studies, clinical trials, clinical metabolic studies, and genetic studies reporting the effects of statin therapy on the risk of diabetes. Recent studies aiming to explain the mechanisms how statin treatment affects insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion are also reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes by 9%-12% in the two meta-analyses of statin trials and by 18%-99% in five population-based studies. Statin therapy impairs insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion based on clinical and epidemiologic studies. In vitro studies demonstrate that the most diabetogenic statins impair insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion by multiple mechanisms. Recent genetic studies suggest that the increased risk of type 2 diabetes may be partially explained by gene variants in the target genes for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering drugs. Population-based studies report higher incidence rates for diabetes in individuals on statin treatment compared with clinical trials. Incident diabetes has not been a prespecified endpoint in statin trials and glucose and/or HbA1c have not been routinely measured. Therefore, it is possible that the risk of diabetes in individuals on statin treatment has been underestimated in previous statin trials. Accumulating evidence from several statin trials, population-based studies, clinical studies, and in vitro studies suggests that pravastatin is the least diabetogenic statin, and simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin the most diabetogenic statins. In vitro studies have reported new findings on mechanisms how statin treatment affects insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. In spite of diabetogenicity of different statins, the consensus is that the benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular events clearly outweigh the risk of diabetes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the recent population-based studies, clinical trials, clinical metabolic studies, and genetic studies reporting the effects of statin therapy on the risk of diabetes. Recent studies aiming to explain the mechanisms how statin treatment affects insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion are also reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes by 9%-12% in the two meta-analyses of statin trials and by 18%-99% in five population-based studies. Statin therapy impairs insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion based on clinical and epidemiologic studies. In vitro studies demonstrate that the most diabetogenic statins impair insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion by multiple mechanisms. Recent genetic studies suggest that the increased risk of type 2 diabetes may be partially explained by gene variants in the target genes for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering drugs. Population-based studies report higher incidence rates for diabetes in individuals on statin treatment compared with clinical trials. Incident diabetes has not been a prespecified endpoint in statin trials and glucose and/or HbA1c have not been routinely measured. Therefore, it is possible that the risk of diabetes in individuals on statin treatment has been underestimated in previous statin trials. Accumulating evidence from several statin trials, population-based studies, clinical studies, and in vitro studies suggests that pravastatin is the least diabetogenic statin, and simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin the most diabetogenic statins. In vitro studies have reported new findings on mechanisms how statin treatment affects insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. In spite of diabetogenicity of different statins, the consensus is that the benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular events clearly outweigh the risk of diabetes.
Authors: Estela Lorza-Gil; Alessandro G Salerno; Amarylis C B A Wanschel; Jean F Vettorazzi; Mônica S Ferreira; Thiago Rentz; Rodrigo R Catharino; Helena C F Oliveira Journal: Toxicology Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Annie L Culver; Ira S Ockene; Raji Balasubramanian; Barbara C Olendzki; Deidre M Sepavich; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Joann E Manson; Yongxia Qiao; Simin Liu; Philip A Merriam; Catherine Rahilly-Tierny; Fridtjof Thomas; Jeffrey S Berger; Judith K Ockene; J David Curb; Yunsheng Ma Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-01-09
Authors: David Preiss; Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai; Paul Welsh; Sabina A Murphy; Jennifer E Ho; David D Waters; David A DeMicco; Philip Barter; Christopher P Cannon; Marc S Sabatine; Eugene Braunwald; John J P Kastelein; James A de Lemos; Michael A Blazing; Terje R Pedersen; Matti J Tikkanen; Naveed Sattar; Kausik K Ray Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maria Fizelova; Manna Miilunpohja; Antti J Kangas; Pasi Soininen; Johanna Kuusisto; Mika Ala-Korpela; Markku Laakso; Alena Stančáková Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Jose A Caparrós-Martín; Ricky R Lareu; Joshua P Ramsay; Jörg Peplies; F Jerry Reen; Henrietta A Headlam; Natalie C Ward; Kevin D Croft; Philip Newsholme; Jeffery D Hughes; Fergal O'Gara Journal: Microbiome Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Baqiyyah N Conway; Xijing Han; Heather M Munro; Amy L Gross; Xiao-Ou Shu; Margaret K Hargreaves; Wei Zheng; Alvin C Powers; William J Blot Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Corinna Dannecker; Robert Wagner; Andreas Peter; Julia Hummel; Andreas Vosseler; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Andreas Fritsche; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Norbert Stefan; Martin Heni Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Basil S Karam; Alejandro Chavez-Moreno; Wonjoon Koh; Joseph G Akar; Fadi G Akar Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 9.951