| Literature DB >> 28154743 |
Andressa Juliane Martins1, Suleima Pedroza Vasconcelos2, Debra Jean Skene3, Arne Lowden4, Claudia Roberta de Castro Moreno5.
Abstract
Physical activity has been recommended as a strategy for improving sleep. Nevertheless, physical effort at work might not be not the ideal type of activity to promote sleep quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of type of job (low vs. high physical effort) and life-style on sleep of workers from an Amazonian Extractivist Reserve, Brazil. A cross-sectional study of 148 low physical activity (factory workers) and 340 high physical activity (rubber tappers) was conducted between September and November 2011. The workers filled out questionnaires collecting data on demographics (sex, age, occupation, marital status and children), health (reported morbidities, sleep disturbances, musculoskeletal pain and body mass index) and life-style (smoking, alcohol use and practice of leisure-time physical activity). Logistic regression models were applied with the presence of sleep disturbances as the primary outcome variable. The prevalence of sleep disturbances among factory workers and rubber tappers was 15.5% and 27.9%, respectively. The following independent variables of the analysis were selected based on a univariate model (p<0.20): sex, age, marital status, work type, smoking, morbidities and musculoskeletal pain. The predictors for sleep disturbances were type of job (high physical effort); sex (female); age (>40 years), and having musculoskeletal pain (≥5 symptoms). Rubber tapper work, owing to greater physical effort, pain and musculoskeletal fatigue, was associated with sleep disturbances. Being female and older than 40 years were also predictors of poor sleep. In short, these findings suggest that demanding physical exertion at work may not improve sleep quality.Entities:
Keywords: Life style; Musculoskeletal pain; Physical activity; Sleep disturbances; Work
Year: 2016 PMID: 28154743 PMCID: PMC5279928 DOI: 10.1016/j.slsci.2016.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep Sci ISSN: 1984-0063
Fig. 1Map of Acre state and location of the Chico Mendes Extractivist Reserve (RESEX). Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Não Renováveis [IBAMA], 2006.
Shift type and working times of study participants (n=488).
| Factory | Moderate | Electrical testing and packing | Rotating | 14:00–23:00 h | 70 |
| 06:00–15:00 h | |||||
| 22:00–07:00 h | |||||
| Factory | Moderate | Production | Rotating | 06:00–18:00 h | 10 |
| 18:00–06:00 h | |||||
| Factory | Moderate | Maintenance | Rotating | 08:00–20:00 h | 11 |
| 20:00–08:00 h | |||||
| Factory | Low | Administrative | Day | 08:00–18:00 h | 46 |
| Factory | Moderate | Cleaning | Rotating | 06:00–14:00 h | 11 |
| 14:00–22:00 h | |||||
| Rubber tapper | High | Extractivism | Day | 05:00–17:00 h | 340 |
Classification by metabolic rate according to Brazilian Bylaws no 15 (BRASIL, 1978).
Socio-demographic, life-style and health characteristics according to degree of physical activity (n=488).
| Sex | Male | 311 | 91.5 | 77 | 52 | |
| Female | 29 | 8.5 | 71 | 48 | ||
| Age | 18–30 years | 82 | 24.1 | 116 | 78.4 | |
| 31–40 years | 85 | 25.0 | 26 | 17.6 | ||
| >40 years | 170 | 50.0 | 6 | 4.1 | ||
| Marital Status | Single | 92 | 27.1 | 91 | 61.5 | |
| Married/live with partner | 248 | 72.9 | 57 | 38.5 | ||
| Practice physical exercise | Yes | 127 | 37.4 | 90 | 60.8 | |
| No | 213 | 62.6 | 58 | 39.2 | ||
| Smoking | Yes | 169 | 49.7 | 19 | 12.8 | |
| No | 171 | 50.3 | 129 | 87.2 | ||
| Alcohol use | Yes | 173 | 50.9 | 88 | 59.5 | n.s. |
| No | 167 | 49.1 | 60 | 40.5 | ||
| Nutritional Status | Normal | 240 | 72.3 | 83 | 57.2 | |
| Overweight/Obesity | 92 | 27.7 | 62 | 42.8 | ||
Fig. 2Frequency of sleep disturbances (KSQ), reported morbidities and musculoskeletal pain among high and low/moderate physical activity (n=488). Pearson's Chi-square test, *p<0.05.
Fig. 3Final logistic regression model according to presence of sleep disturbances (KSQ) in the study sample (n=488). Dashed line at 1 means reference cut-off. *p<0.05 OR [CI95%].