Literature DB >> 28153937

Beliefs and Attitudes to Bowel Cancer Screening in Patients with CKD: A Semistructured Interview Study.

Laura J James1,2, Germaine Wong3,2, Jonathan C Craig3,2, Angela Ju3,2, Narelle Williams3,2, Wai H Lim4, Nicholas Cross5, Allison Tong3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bowel cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in people with CKD. Shared decision making regarding cancer screening is particularly complex in CKD and requires an understanding of patients' values and priorities, which remain largely unknown. Our study aimed to describe the beliefs and attitudes to bowel cancer screening in patients with CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Face to face, semistructured interviews were conducted from April of 2014 to December of 2015 with 38 participants ages 39-78 years old with CKD stages 3-5, on dialysis, or transplant recipients from four renal units in Australia and New Zealand. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcripts.
RESULTS: Five themes were identified: invisibility of cancer (unspoken stigma, ambiguity of risk, and absence of symptomatic prompting); prioritizing kidney disease (preserving the chance of transplantation, over-riding attention to kidney disease, protecting graft survival, and showing loyalty to the donor); preventing the crisis of cancer (evading severe consequences and cognizant of susceptibility); cognitive resistance (reluctance to perform a repulsive procedure, intensifying disease burden threshold, anxiety of a positive test, and accepting the inevitable); and pragmatic accessibility (negligible financial effect, convenience, and protecting anonymity).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD understand the potential health benefits of bowel cancer screening, but they are primarily committed to their kidney health. Their decisions regarding screening revolve around their present health needs, priorities, and concerns. Explicit consideration of the potential practical and psychosocial burdens that bowel cancer screening may impose on patients in addition to kidney disease and current treatment is suggested to minimize decisional conflict and improve patient satisfaction and health care outcomes in CKD.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Attention; Attitude; Australia; Cognition; Early Detection of Cancer; Graft Survival; Humans; Neoplasms; New Zealand; Patient Satisfaction; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Transplant Recipients; bowel cancer screening; chronic kidney disease; interview; kidney; kidney transplant recipient; qualitative research; renal dialysis; shared-decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153937      PMCID: PMC5383392          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10090916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  28 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Life expectancy benefits of cancer screening in the end-stage renal disease population.

Authors:  C J LeBrun; L F Diehl; K C Abbott; P G Welch; C M Yuan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Cancer risk in patients on dialysis and after renal transplantation.

Authors:  S A Birkeland; H Løkkegaard; H H Storm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

5.  Screening for prostate, breast and colorectal cancer in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Bryce A Kiberd; Tammy Keough-Ryan; Catherine M Clase
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Cancer screening and life expectancy of Canadian patients with kidney failure.

Authors:  Sahar Kajbaf; Graham Nichol; Deborah Zimmerman
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Designing health care for the most common chronic condition--multimorbidity.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Terri R Fried; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Margaret W Y Li; Kirsten Howard; Danny K Hua; Jeremy R Chapman; Michael Bourke; Robin Turner; Allison Tong; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intention among Indigenous Western Australians.

Authors:  Aliki Christou; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

1.  One-Time Fecal Immunochemical Screening for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with CKD (DETECT Study).

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Richard L Hope; Kirsten Howard; Jeremy R Chapman; Antoni Castells; Simon D Roger; Michael J Bourke; Petra Macaskill; Robin Turner; Gabrielle Williams; Wai Hon Lim; Charmaine E Lok; Fritz Diekmann; Nicholas B Cross; Shaundeep Sen; Richard D M Allen; Steven J Chadban; Carol A Pollock; Allison Tong; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Jean Y H Yang; Narelle Williams; Eric Hoi Kit Au; Anh Kieu; Laura James; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  De Novo Malignancies after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  David Al-Adra; Talal Al-Qaoud; Kevin Fowler; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Emerging Concepts in Managing Malignancy in Kidney Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Brittany Schreiber; Maen Abdelrahim; Ala Abudayyeh; Naoka Murakami
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Wangmar; Ann-Christin von Vogelsang; Rolf Hultcrantz; Kaisa Fritzell; Yvonne Wengström; Anna Jervaeus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Examining the Relationship between Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Kidney Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Türev Demirtaş; Zekeriya Temircan
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2021-11-28

Review 6.  Assessment of kidney transplant suitability for patients with prior cancers: is it time for a rethink?

Authors:  Wai H Lim; Eric Au; Anoushka Krishnan; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.782

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.