Literature DB >> 23182812

Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.

Germaine Wong1, Margaret W Y Li, Kirsten Howard, Danny K Hua, Jeremy R Chapman, Michael Bourke, Robin Turner, Allison Tong, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people with chronic kidney disease, it remains uncertain whether early detection through screening is cost-effective in this setting. We aimed to determine the costs and health benefits of CRC screening in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.
METHODS: Using a government health perspective, three probabilistic Markov models were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of annual immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening against no-screening in a cohort of 1000 patients (age 50-70 years) on dialysis and with kidney transplants. A series of one-way, multi-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model structure and the extent in which the model's assumptions were sensitive to the uncertainties within the input variables.
RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of CRC screening compared with no-screening were $138 828 per quality-adjusted life year [QALY; $122 977 per life year saved (LYS)], $121 973 per QALY ($ 85 095 per LYS) and $44 790 per QALY ($25 036 per LYS) for dialysis patients not listed on the transplant waiting list, patients on the transplant waiting list and patients with kidney transplants, respectively. The test specificity of iFOBT, the starting age of screening and cancer prevalence were influential factors that determined the overall cost-effectiveness of screening in this setting.
CONCLUSION: Screening for CRC using iFOBT may reduce cancer-specific mortality in patients on dialysis and with kidney transplants. However, the benefits and costs of screening CRCs in patients on dialysis, especially for those deemed not suitable for transplantation, greatly exceeded the typical thresholds for acceptable cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182812     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  8 in total

1.  Beliefs and Attitudes to Bowel Cancer Screening in Patients with CKD: A Semistructured Interview Study.

Authors:  Laura J James; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Angela Ju; Narelle Williams; Wai H Lim; Nicholas Cross; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  One-Time Fecal Immunochemical Screening for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with CKD (DETECT Study).

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Richard L Hope; Kirsten Howard; Jeremy R Chapman; Antoni Castells; Simon D Roger; Michael J Bourke; Petra Macaskill; Robin Turner; Gabrielle Williams; Wai Hon Lim; Charmaine E Lok; Fritz Diekmann; Nicholas B Cross; Shaundeep Sen; Richard D M Allen; Steven J Chadban; Carol A Pollock; Allison Tong; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Jean Y H Yang; Narelle Williams; Eric Hoi Kit Au; Anh Kieu; Laura James; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  De Novo Malignancies after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  David Al-Adra; Talal Al-Qaoud; Kevin Fowler; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Clinical and Economic Consequences of Early Cancer After Kidney Transplantation in Contemporary Practice.

Authors:  Vikas R Dharnidharka; Abhijit S Naik; David Axelrod; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; Daniel C Brennan; Dorry L Segev; Henry Randall; Jiajing Chen; Bertram Kasiske; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The benefits of cancer screening in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Taigo Kato; Yoichi Kakuta; Toyofumi Abe; Kazuaki Yamanaka; Ryoichi Imamura; Masayoshi Okumi; Naotsugu Ichimaru; Shiro Takahara; Norio Nonomura
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Colonoscopy as Part of Pre-Transplant Work-Up in Successful Kidney Transplant Candidates: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jarek Kobiela; Małgorzata Dobrzycka; Roman Danielewicz; Justyna Jończyk; Andrzej J Łachiński; Zbigniew Śledziński; Alicja Dębska-Ślizień
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.530

7.  Economic Evaluation of Screening for Polyomavirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Thida Maung Myint; Yoon Jae Lee; Jonathan C Craig; David Axelrod; Bryce Kiberd
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2022-04-15

8.  Comparison of trends in colorectal cancer screening in the US end-stage renal disease population and the US Medicare population.

Authors:  Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul L Kimmel; Paul W Eggers; Kevin C Abbott
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-06-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.