Sloane K Tilley1, David M Reif2, Rebecca C Fry3. 1. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: sloanekathryn@unc.edu. 2. Bioinformatics Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: dmreif@ncsu.edu. 3. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: rfry@unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Superfund program of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established in 1980 to address public health concerns posed by toxic substances released into the environment in the United States. Forty-two of the 1328 hazardous waste sites that remain on the Superfund National Priority List are located in the state of North Carolina. METHODS: We set out to develop a database that contained information on both the prevalence and biological activity of chemicals present at Superfund sites in North Carolina. A chemical characterization tool, the Toxicological Priority Index (ToxPi), was used to rank the biological activity of these chemicals based on their predicted bioavailability, documented associations with biological pathways, and activity in in vitro assays of the ToxCast and Tox21 programs. RESULTS: The ten most prevalent chemicals found at North Carolina Superfund sites were chromium, trichloroethene, lead, tetrachloroethene, arsenic, benzene, manganese, 1,2-dichloroethane, nickel, and barium. For all chemicals found at North Carolina Superfund sites, ToxPi analysis was used to rank their biological activity. Through this data integration, residual pesticides and organic solvents were identified to be some of the most highly-ranking predicted bioactive chemicals. This study provides a novel methodology for creating state or regional databases of biological activity of contaminants at Superfund sites. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent a novel integrated profile of the most prevalent chemicals at North Carolina Superfund sites. This information, and the associated methodology, is useful to toxicologists, risk assessors, and the communities living in close proximity to these sites.
BACKGROUND: The Superfund program of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established in 1980 to address public health concerns posed by toxic substances released into the environment in the United States. Forty-two of the 1328 hazardous waste sites that remain on the Superfund National Priority List are located in the state of North Carolina. METHODS: We set out to develop a database that contained information on both the prevalence and biological activity of chemicals present at Superfund sites in North Carolina. A chemical characterization tool, the Toxicological Priority Index (ToxPi), was used to rank the biological activity of these chemicals based on their predicted bioavailability, documented associations with biological pathways, and activity in in vitro assays of the ToxCast and Tox21 programs. RESULTS: The ten most prevalent chemicals found at North Carolina Superfund sites were chromium, trichloroethene, lead, tetrachloroethene, arsenic, benzene, manganese, 1,2-dichloroethane, nickel, and barium. For all chemicals found at North Carolina Superfund sites, ToxPi analysis was used to rank their biological activity. Through this data integration, residual pesticides and organic solvents were identified to be some of the most highly-ranking predicted bioactive chemicals. This study provides a novel methodology for creating state or regional databases of biological activity of contaminants at Superfund sites. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent a novel integrated profile of the most prevalent chemicals at North Carolina Superfund sites. This information, and the associated methodology, is useful to toxicologists, risk assessors, and the communities living in close proximity to these sites.
Authors: Russell S Thomas; Michael B Black; Lili Li; Eric Healy; Tzu-Ming Chu; Wenjun Bao; Melvin E Andersen; Russell D Wolfinger Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Igor V Tetko; Johann Gasteiger; Roberto Todeschini; Andrea Mauri; David Livingstone; Peter Ertl; Vladimir A Palyulin; Eugene V Radchenko; Nikolay S Zefirov; Alexander S Makarenko; Vsevolod Yu Tanchuk; Volodymyr V Prokopenko Journal: J Comput Aided Mol Des Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.686
Authors: Dawoon Jung; Cole W Matson; Leonard B Collins; Geoff Laban; Heather M Stapleton; John W Bickham; James A Swenberg; Richard T Di Giulio Journal: Ecotoxicology Date: 2011-06-26 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Richard Judson; Robert Kavlock; Matthew Martin; David Reif; Keith Houck; Thomas Knudsen; Ann Richard; Raymond R Tice; Maurice Whelan; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher Austin; George Daston; Thomas Hartung; John R Fowle; William Wooge; Weida Tong; David Dix Journal: ALTEX Date: 2013 Impact factor: 6.043
Authors: Alison P Sanders; Tania A Desrosiers; Joshua L Warren; Amy H Herring; Dianne Enright; Andrew F Olshan; Robert E Meyer; Rebecca C Fry Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ann M Richard; Ruili Huang; Suramya Waidyanatha; Paul Shinn; Bradley J Collins; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Christopher M Grulke; Antony J Williams; Ryan R Lougee; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Mahmoud Shobair; Chihae Yang; James F Rathman; Adam Yasgar; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Anton Simeonov; Russell S Thomas; Kevin M Crofton; Richard S Paules; John R Bucher; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren Journal: ALTEX Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 6.043
Authors: Skylar W Marvel; Kimberly To; Fabian A Grimm; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn; David M Reif Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Michele Balik-Meisner; Lisa Truong; Elizabeth H Scholl; Jane K La Du; Robert L Tanguay; David M Reif Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: John S House; Jonathan Hall; Sarah S Park; Antonio Planchart; Eric Money; Rachel L Maguire; Zhiqing Huang; Carolyn J Mattingly; David Skaar; Jung Ying Tzeng; Thomas H Darrah; Avner Vengosh; Susan K Murphy; Randy L Jirtle; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: Environ Epigenet Date: 2019-08-29