Literature DB >> 28152276

Measuring Nurses' Value, Implementation, and Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice: Further Psychometric Testing of the Quick-EBP-VIK Survey.

Linda Connor1, Fiona Paul2, Margaret McCabe3, Sonja Ziniel4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Quick-EBP-VIK is a new instrument for measuring nurses' value, implementation, and knowledge of EBP. Psychometric testing was conducted in two parts. Part 1 describes the tool development and validity testing which resulted in the development of a 25-item survey after receiving ≥0.80 Item-Level Content Validity Index for both clarity and relevance. Part 2 describes psychometric testing was necessary to assess additional types of validity and reliability. AIM: The purpose of this paper is to further describe the psychometric testing of the Quick-EBP-VIK survey instrument.
METHODS: This descriptive study was designed to assess test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity via a web-based survey. The survey instrument was e-mailed to all nurses at the study hospital. Nurses who responded to the first survey (Wave 1) received another e-mail invitation to complete the survey instrument again (Wave 2) for the purpose of assessing the test-retest reliability of the instrument.
RESULTS: A total of 1,177 deliverable e-mails were sent to all nursing staff at one free standing pediatric hospital with Magnet® designation in the northeast. A total of 382 nurses returned completed surveys, indicating a 32.5% response rate for Wave 1. A total of 131 nurses responded to Wave 2 indicating a response rate of 34.3%. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the items included in the final instrument ranged from 0.43 to 0.80 and were deemed sufficient. These represent a sufficient intraclass correlation coefficient. The Cronbach's Alpha values for each of the three domains are all higher than 0.7 indicating that the items of each of the measurement dimension are internally consistent. However, the composite reliability of the third domain was slightly lower than 0.7 when using Raykov's Rho. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The Quick-EBP-VIK instrument has gone through rigorous comprehensive testing and has demonstrated good psychometric properties.
© 2016 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evidence-based practice; implementation; instrument development; nursing; values

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28152276     DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of an evidence-based practice mentorship programme in a paediatric quaternary care setting.

Authors:  Ethan Schuler; Sandra Mott; Peter W Forbes; Alexis Schmid; Carole Atkinson; Michele DeGrazia
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  School Nurses' Perceptions, Knowledge, and Related Factors Associated with Evidence-Based Practice in Taiwan.

Authors:  Pei-Lin Hsieh; Sue-Hsien Chen; Li-Chun Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making (EIDM) competence measure.

Authors:  Emily Belita; Kathryn Fisher; Jennifer Yost; Janet E Squires; Rebecca Ganann; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Belita; Janet E Squires; Jennifer Yost; Rebecca Ganann; Trish Burnett; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2020-05-27

5.  Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q).

Authors:  Ming-Yu Hu; Yan-Ni Wu; Maureen Patricia McEvoy; Yan-Fang Wang; Wei-Lian Cong; Li-Ping Liu; Xiao-Xia Li; Chun-Lan Zhou
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.

Authors:  María Ruzafa-Martínez; Serafín Fernández-Salazar; César Leal-Costa; Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.931

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.