Literature DB >> 28149022

Application of Sigma Metrics Analysis for the Assessment and Modification of Quality Control Program in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Sahar Iqbal1, Tazeen Mustansar1.   

Abstract

Sigma is a metric that quantifies the performance of a process as a rate of Defects-Per-Million opportunities. In clinical laboratories, sigma metric analysis is used to assess the performance of laboratory process system. Sigma metric is also used as a quality management strategy for a laboratory process to improve the quality by addressing the errors after identification. The aim of this study is to evaluate the errors in quality control of analytical phase of laboratory system by sigma metric. For this purpose sigma metric analysis was done for analytes using the internal and external quality control as quality indicators. Results of sigma metric analysis were used to identify the gaps and need for modification in the strategy of laboratory quality control procedure. Sigma metric was calculated for quality control program of ten clinical chemistry analytes including glucose, chloride, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, albumin, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, protein and creatinine, at two control levels. To calculate the sigma metric imprecision and bias was calculated with internal and external quality control data, respectively. The minimum acceptable performance was considered as 3 sigma. Westgard sigma rules were applied to customize the quality control procedure. Sigma level was found acceptable (≥3) for glucose (L2), cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, direct bilirubin and creatinine at both levels of control. For rest of the analytes sigma metric was found <3. The lowest value for sigma was found for chloride (1.1) at L2. The highest value of sigma was found for creatinine (10.1) at L3. HDL was found with the highest sigma values at both control levels (8.8 and 8.0 at L2 and L3, respectively). We conclude that analytes with the sigma value <3 are required strict monitoring and modification in quality control procedure. In this study application of sigma rules provided us the practical solution for improved and focused design of QC procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Laboratory proficiency testing; Quality control; Quality indicators

Year:  2016        PMID: 28149022      PMCID: PMC5247363          DOI: 10.1007/s12291-016-0565-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0970-1915


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale.

Authors:  D Nevalainen; L Berte; C Kraft; E Leigh; L Picaso; T Morgan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Selection of an optimal combination of decision criteria for the internal quality control in an automatic analyzer.

Authors:  G R Menéndez; C O Cabrera
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies.

Authors:  James O Westgard
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 4.  Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Six Sigma and laboratory consultation.

Authors:  Abdurrahman Coskun
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Westgard multirule for calculated laboratory tests.

Authors:  Abdurrahman Coskun
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Statistical quality control procedures.

Authors:  James O Westgard
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.935

8.  Implementation of a multirule, multistage quality control program in a clinical laboratory computer system.

Authors:  A A Eggert; J O Westgard; P L Barry; K A Emmerich
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Performance characteristics of Bull's multirule algorithm for the quality control of multichannel hematology analyzers.

Authors:  E S Lunetzky; G S Cembrowski
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice.

Authors:  Andrea S Fokkens; P Auke Wiegersma; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes.

Authors:  Shuang Cao; Xiaosong Qin
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

2.  Assessment of quality control system by sigma metrics and quality goal index ratio: A roadmap towards preparation for NABL.

Authors:  Monica Verma; Kiran Dahiya; Veena Singh Ghalaut; Vasudha Dhupper
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2018-11-29

3.  Analysis of performance of clinical biochemistry laboratory using Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index.

Authors:  Parul Goel; Gagandeep Malik; Suvarna Prasad; Isha Rani; Sunita Manhas; Kapil Goel
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Application of Six Sigma for evaluating the analytical quality of tumor marker assays.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Mei Fu; Fumeng Yang; Wei Liang; Chuanxi Yang; Wenjun Zhu; Liming Ma; Changxin Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.