Literature DB >> 28145063

A closer look at novel climates: new methods and insights at continental to landscape scales.

Colin R Mahony1, Alex J Cannon2, Tongli Wang1, Sally N Aitken1.   

Abstract

Novel climates - emerging conditions with no analog in the observational record - are an open problem in ecological modeling. Detecting extrapolation into novel conditions is a critical step in evaluating bioclimatic projections of how species and ecosystems will respond to climate change. However, biologically informed novelty detection methods remain elusive for many modeling algorithms. To assist with bioclimatic model design and evaluation, we present a first-approximation assessment of general novelty based on a simple and consistent characterization of climate. We build on the seminal global analysis of Williams et al. (2007 PNAS, 104, 5738) by assessing of end-of-21st-century novelty for North America at high spatial resolution and by refining their standardized Euclidean distance into an intuitive Mahalanobian metric called sigma dissimilarity. Like this previous study, we found extensive novelty in end-of-21st-century projections for the warm southern margin of the continent as well as the western Arctic. In addition, we detected localized novelty in lower topographic positions at all latitudes: By the end of the 21st century, novel climates are projected to emerge at low elevations in 80% and 99% of ecoregions in the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emissions scenarios, respectively. Novel climates are limited to 7% of the continent's area in RCP4.5, but are much more extensive in RCP8.5 (40% of area). These three risk factors for novel climates - regional susceptibility, topographic position, and the magnitude of projected climate change - represent a priori evaluation criteria for the credibility of bioclimatic projections. Our findings indicate that novel climates can emerge in any landscape. Interpreting climatic novelty in the context of nonlinear biological responses to climate is an important challenge for future research.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mahalanobis distance; bioclimate; climate change; climate envelope; model extrapolation; no-analog; novel climates; species distribution modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28145063     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  10 in total

1.  Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.

Authors:  K D Burke; J W Williams; M A Chandler; A M Haywood; D J Lunt; B L Otto-Bliesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The conflict between adaptation and dispersal for maintaining biodiversity in changing environments.

Authors:  Patrick L Thompson; Emanuel A Fronhofer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America.

Authors:  Kevin D Burke; John W Williams; Simon Brewer; Walter Finsinger; Thomas Giesecke; David J Lorenz; Alejandro Ordonez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Assessing agreement among alternative climate change projections to inform conservation recommendations in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  R Travis Belote; Carlos Carroll; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Julia Michalak; John W Williams; Matthew A Williamson; Gregory H Aplet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Rapid changes in seed dispersal traits may modify plant responses to global change.

Authors:  Jeremy S Johnson; Robert Stephen Cantrell; Chris Cosner; Florian Hartig; Alan Hastings; Haldre S Rogers; Eugene W Schupp; Katriona Shea; Brittany J Teller; Xiao Yu; Damaris Zurell; Gesine Pufal
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Understanding climate change from a global analysis of city analogues.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Bastin; Emily Clark; Thomas Elliott; Simon Hart; Johan van den Hoogen; Iris Hordijk; Haozhi Ma; Sabiha Majumder; Gabriele Manoli; Julia Maschler; Lidong Mo; Devin Routh; Kailiang Yu; Constantin M Zohner; Thomas W Crowther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The rise of novelty in marine ecosystems: The Baltic Sea case.

Authors:  Yosr Ammar; Susa Niiranen; Saskia A Otto; Christian Möllmann; Walter Finsinger; Thorsten Blenckner
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Identifying the natural reserve area of Cistanche salsa under the effects of multiple host plants and climate change conditions using a maximum entropy model in Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Minghao Shao; Jinglong Fan; Jinbiao Ma; Lei Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Wetter summers can intensify departures from natural variability in a warming climate.

Authors:  Colin R Mahony; Alex J Cannon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Modularity of genes involved in local adaptation to climate despite physical linkage.

Authors:  Katie E Lotterhos; Sam Yeaman; Jon Degner; Sally Aitken; Kathryn A Hodgins
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 13.583

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.