Anneke S de Vos1, Mart P Janssen1, Hans L Zaaijer2, Boris M Hogema2. 1. Transfusion Technology Assessment Unit, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Blood-Borne Infections, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) has increased substantially in Europe recently, thereby threatening blood safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis for HEV screening of blood donations in the Netherlands was performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A simulation model was developed to mimic the process of donation, infections in the donor population, donation testing, and transmission to transfusion recipients. The variability of viral loads among donors was modeled using observed loads. The number of (incurable) chronic HEV infections among organ and stem cell transplant patients and the costs avoided by implementing blood screening were estimated. RESULTS: HEV screening of whole blood donations in pools of 24 would prevent 4.52 of the 4.94 transfusion-associated chronic HEV infections expected annually, at approximately €310,000 per prevented chronic case. Per case not curable by ribavirin prevention, costs are approximately 10 times higher. Selective screening, if logistically feasible, could reduce screening costs by 85%. Sensitivity analyses show that uncertainty in the HEV transmissibility and the frequency of HEV clearing greatly impact the estimated cost-effectiveness. Of all HEV infections nationwide one in 700 is estimated to be due to blood transfusion, while for chronic infections this is one in 3.5. CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties in our estimates, preventing HEV transmission by screening of blood donations appears not excessively expensive compared to other blood-screening measures in the Netherlands. However, the impact on HEV disease burden may be relatively small as only a minority of all HEV cases is transmitted by blood transfusion.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) has increased substantially in Europe recently, thereby threatening blood safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis for HEV screening of blood donations in the Netherlands was performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A simulation model was developed to mimic the process of donation, infections in the donor population, donation testing, and transmission to transfusion recipients. The variability of viral loads among donors was modeled using observed loads. The number of (incurable) chronic HEVinfections among organ and stem cell transplant patients and the costs avoided by implementing blood screening were estimated. RESULTS:HEV screening of whole blood donations in pools of 24 would prevent 4.52 of the 4.94 transfusion-associated chronic HEVinfections expected annually, at approximately €310,000 per prevented chronic case. Per case not curable by ribavirin prevention, costs are approximately 10 times higher. Selective screening, if logistically feasible, could reduce screening costs by 85%. Sensitivity analyses show that uncertainty in the HEV transmissibility and the frequency of HEV clearing greatly impact the estimated cost-effectiveness. Of all HEVinfections nationwide one in 700 is estimated to be due to blood transfusion, while for chronic infections this is one in 3.5. CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties in our estimates, preventing HEV transmission by screening of blood donations appears not excessively expensive compared to other blood-screening measures in the Netherlands. However, the impact on HEV disease burden may be relatively small as only a minority of all HEV cases is transmitted by blood transfusion.
Authors: Malgorzata Mikulska; Olaf Penack; Lotus Wendel; Nina Knelange; Jan J Cornelissen; Nicole Blijlevens; Jakob Passweg; Nicolaus Kroger; Anke Bruns; Christian Koenecke; Marc Bierings; José Luis Piñana; Helene Labussiere-Wallet; Herve Ghesquieres; Miguel Angel Diaz; Antonia Sampol; Diana Averbuch; Rafael de la Camara; Jan Styczynski Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Heléne Norder; Cristina Galli; Ellen Magnil; Per Sikora; Elisabet Ekvärn; Kristina Nyström; Lars O Magnius Journal: Intervirology Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: John R Ticehurst; Nora Pisanic; Michael S Forman; Carly Ordak; Christopher D Heaney; Edgar Ong; Jeffrey M Linnen; Paul M Ness; Nan Guo; Hua Shan; Kenrad E Nelson Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Marion C Lanteri; Felicia Santa-Maria; Andrew Laughhunn; Yvette A Girard; Marcus Picard-Maureau; Jean-Marc Payrat; Johannes Irsch; Adonis Stassinopoulos; Peter Bringmann Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.157