| Literature DB >> 28144026 |
Junduan Wu1, Jianbo Liu1, Jian Qin1, Cairong Lan2, Hanjun Yang2, Li Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethnic minorities present specific mental health characteristics that are based on their unique cultural background. We aimed to investigate the mental health status and coping behaviors in the Guangxi Baiku Yao population, an ethnic minority in China. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 121 Baiku Yao, 149 Zhuang, and 141 Han from Nandan Guangxi were enrolled in a survey using stratified random cluster sampling. The questionnaires included general information, a simplified mental symptom checklist, life events, coping behaviors, and social support. RESULTS The number of stimulating life events in Baiku Yao, particularly in males, was higher than that in the other two groups. Anxiety, depression, and mental symptom scores in Baiku Yao were higher than those in the other two groups. After adjusting for demographic variables, variation in mental health that could be explained by negative coping and life events increased by 40.5% and 7.6%, respectively. All path coefficients were significant (P<0.01); the ratio of the fitting value and the degree of freedom was 1.496, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.035. CONCLUSIONS Mental symptoms of the Baiku Yao population in Nandan (Guangxi) were more severe than those in other Chinese ethnic groups. Life events affected mental symptoms through negative coping.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28144026 PMCID: PMC5301957 DOI: 10.12659/msm.899627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Characteristics of the subjects.
| Variable | Category | Baiku Yao (n=124) | Zhuang (n=149) | Han (n=141) | χ2/Hc/F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male (149) | 49 | 52 | 48 | 0.978 | 0.613 |
| Female (265) | 75 | 97 | 93 | |||
| Age | 48.35±15.45 | 49.10±16.03 | 49.23±16.31 | 1.325 | 0.061 | |
| Education | Illiteracy or semiliterate | 63 | 35 | 38 | 15.793 | <0.01 |
| Primary school | 32 | 50 | 56 | |||
| Junior scholle or above | 29 | 64 | 47 | |||
| Income (yuan/month) | 0–499 | 106 | 94 | 103 | 4.364 | 0.113 |
| 500–999 | 14 | 36 | 29 | |||
| Above 1000 | 4 | 19 | 9 | |||
| Family population | 4.92±1.86 | 4.94±1.74 | 4.99±1.85 | 0.047 | 0.954 | |
Chi-square for gender. Rank sum test for education and income. ANOVA for age and family population.
Comparison of life events among Baiku Yao, Han and Zhuang ethnics.
| Category/Item | LES score | Family event | Work event | Socialand other events |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baiku Yao (n=121) | 22.8±11.3 | 2.9±2.8 | 2.9±2.843 | 1.039±2.509 |
| Male | 23.7±10.6 | 3.2±3.4 | 0.2±0.9 | 1.1±2.3 |
| Female | 21.2±8.4 | 2.8±2.4 | 0.3±0.8 | 1.0±2.6 |
| Zhuang (n=141) | 18.1±8.3 | 2.2±2.5 | 0.3±1.2 | 1.2±2.9 |
| Male | 17.2±7.7 | 2.0±2.0 | 0.3±1.0 | 1.5±2.9 |
| Female | 18.6±9.1 | 2.3±2.8 | 0.3± 1.3 | 1.1±3.0 |
| Han (n=137) | 17.9±7.1 | 2.2±2.2 | 0.7±0.9 | 1.1±2.5 |
| Male | 18.2±6.2 | 1.8±1.9 | 0.3±1.3 | 0.9±2.6 |
| Female | 17.7±7.3 | 2.4±2.3 | 0.1±0.5 | 1.2±2.4 |
| P | 0.062 | <0.001 | 0.986 | 0.453 |
Compared with Zhuang and Han;
Compared with males in Zhuang and Han.
Comparison of mental symptom, coping mechanisms and social support among Baiku Yao, Zhuang and Han ethnics.
| Ethnics | Somatization | Anxiety | Depression | Hostility | Positive coping | Negative coping | Social support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baiku Yao (n=124) | 1.79±0.66 | 1.70±0.69 | 1.75±0.71 | 1.51±0.56 | 26.32±7.56 | 15.86±4.23 | 36.46±7.33 |
| Zhuang (n=149) | 1.74±0.56 | 1.47±0.55 | 1.56±0.54 | 1.42±0.58 | 26.20±6.91 | 16.29±4.50 | 36.47±8.18 |
| Han (n=141) | 1.83±0.70 | 1.47±0.54 | 1.56±0.54 | 1.39±0.48 | 25.95±7.96 | 15.89±4.93 | 36.04±7.38 |
| Chinese normal (23) | 1.37±0.48 | 1.39±0.43 | 1.50±0.59 | 1.46±0.55 | 21.25±7.14 | 30.26±8.74 | 34.56±3.73 |
P<0.05 Baiku Yao vs. Zhuang;
P<0.01 Baiku Yao vs. Zhuang;
P<0.01 Baiku Yao vs. Han;
P<0.001 between the three ethnics and the Chinese normal.
Relationships between mental symptoms and coping mechanisms, life events as well as social support by hierarchical regression analysis.
| Variable | Mental symptoms (β) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st step | 2nd step | 3rd step | 4th step | 5th step | |
| Control variable | |||||
| Gender | 0.156 | 0.110 | 0.103 | 0.107 | 0.111 |
| Age | 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Ethnic | 0.103 | 0.095 | 0.096 | 0.090 | 0.064 |
| Education | −0.070 | −0.033 | −0.016 | −0.020 | −0.023 |
| Negative coping | 0.640 | 0.682 | 0.689 | 0.554 | |
| Positive coping | −0.081 | −0.058 | −0.032 | ||
| Social support | |||||
| Objective | −0.080 | −0.063 | |||
| Subjective | −0.036 | −0.042 | |||
| Support accessibility | 0.030 | 0.008 | |||
| Life event | |||||
| Family event | 0.141 | ||||
| Work event | 0.206 | ||||
| Social event | 0.070 | ||||
| R2 | 0.044 | 0.449 | 0.453 | 0.463 | 0.539 |
| ΔR2 | 0.405 | 0.004 | 0.010 | 0.076 | |
| F | 4.646 | 66.152 | 55.997 | 38.545 | 38.937 |
P<0.05;
P<0.01;
P<0.001.
Figure 1Path analysis of the mental symptoms by mixed model.
Fitting indices of mixed models.
| χ2 | df | χ2/df | Goodness of fit index (GFI) | Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) | Adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.930 | 16 | 1.496 | 0.985 | 0.035 | 0.967 |