| Literature DB >> 28143466 |
Jun Cheng1, Hualei Zhai2, Junyi Wang2, Haoyun Duan3, Qingjun Zhou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic effects of allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) for symblephara at different degrees caused by ocular burns were evaluated in this study.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical burn; Cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation; Symblepharon; Thermal burn
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28143466 PMCID: PMC5282665 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0403-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Outcomes of fornix reconstruction
| No. of eyes | Complete success n (%) | Partial success n (%) | Failure n (%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 80 | 40 (50.0) | 25 (31.3) | 15 (18.8) | |
| Cause | |||||
| Thermal | 44 | 18 (40.9) | 13 (29.5) | 13 (29.5) | 0.020 |
| Chemical | 36 | 22 (61.1) | 12 (33.3) | 2 (5.6) | |
| Grade of symblepharon length | |||||
| Grade I/II | 20 | 17 (85.0) | 2 (10.0) | 1 (5.0) | 0.001 |
| Grade III | 33 | 17 (51.5) | 10 (30.3) | 6 (18.2) | |
| Grade IV | 27 | 6 (22.2) | 13 (48.1) | 8 (29.6) | |
| Grade of symblepharon width | |||||
| Grade a | 20 | 12 (60.0) | 1 (5.0) | 7 (35.0) | 0.019 |
| Grade b | 27 | 15 (55.6) | 9 (33.3) | 3 (11.1) | |
| Grade c | 33 | 13 (39.4) | 15 (45.5) | 5 (15.2) | |
| Preoperative inflammation | |||||
| ≤1+ | 54 | 34 (63.0) | 16 (29.6) | 4 (7.4) | <0.001 |
| ≥2+ | 26 | 6 (23.1) | 9 (34.6) | 11 (42.3) | |
| Loss of normalcorneal limbal morphology | |||||
| ≤3 quadrants | 23 | 12 (52.2) | 4 (17.4) | 7 (30.4) | 0.113 |
| 4 quadrants | 57 | 28 (49.1) | 21 (36.8) | 8 (19.0) | |
| Time for surgery | |||||
| ≤6 months | 19 | 7 (36.8) | 8 (42.1) | 4 (21.1) | 0.392 |
| >6 months | 61 | 33 (54.1) | 17 (27.9) | 11 (18.0) | |
Fig. 1Grade IVb 0 symblepharon in the inferionasal fornix resulting from thermal burn (a); during the follow-up of 4.5 years, a deep fornix with complete success and a non-neovascularized cornea was noted (b). Grade IIIb 1+ symblepharon in the inferionasal and superonasal fornices resulting from thermal burn (c); a deep fornix without inflammation was noted together with a non-neovascularized cornea during 2 years of follow-up (d). Grade IIIb 1+ symblepharon in the superior fornix resulting from chemical burn (e); a deep fornix with complete success and a clear cornea was noted during 18 months of follow-up (f)
Fig. 2Grade IVa 1+ symblepharon in the inferior fornix resulting from thermal burn (a). a deep fornix was achieved 2 years later (b), and the appearance was improved through wearing a cosmetic contact lens (c)
Fig. 3Survival analysis showing the clinical outcome of cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation for eyes with thermal burns and chemical burns
Fig. 4Survival analysis showing the clinical outcome of cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation for different grades of symblepharon
Risk factors for recurrence of symblepharon
| No. eyes | B value | SE |
| RR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 73 | −0.574 | 0.687 | 0.403 | 0.563 (0.146–2.166) |
| Female | 8 | ||||
| Age | |||||
| ≤18 | 12 | −0.323 | 0.528 | 0.541 | 0.724 (0.257–2.039) |
| >18 | 68 | ||||
| Cause | |||||
| Thermal | 44 | −0.514 | 0.456 | 0.260 | 0.598 (0.245–1.462) |
| Chemical | 36 | ||||
| Time for surgery | |||||
| ≤6 months | 19 | −0.098 | 0.371 | 0.792 | 0.907 (0.438–1.875) |
| >6 months | 61 | ||||
| Grade of symblepharon length | |||||
| Grade I/II | 20 | 0.917 | 0.311 | 0.003 | 2.503 (1.360–4.605) |
| Grade III | 33 | ||||
| Grade IV | 27 | ||||
| Grade of symblepharon width | |||||
| Grade a | 20 | 0.195 | 0.301 | 0.517 | 1.215 (0.674–2.190) |
| Grade b | 27 | ||||
| Grade c | 33 | ||||
| Preoperative inflammation | |||||
| ≤1+ | 54 | 1.003 | 0.415 | 0.016 | 2.726 (1.209–6.147) |
| ≥2+ | 26 | ||||
| Loss of normal coneal limbal morphology | |||||
| ≤3 quadrants | 23 | −0.014 | 0.458 | 0.976 | 0.986 (0.402–2.423) |
| 4 quadrants | 57 | ||||
| Postoperative PED | |||||
| Yes | 15 | 0.444 | 0.425 | 0.297 | 1.558 (0.677–3.588) |
| No | 65 | ||||
| Immune rejection | |||||
| Yes | 7 | 0.661 | 0.839 | 0.431 | 1.936 (0.374–10.025) |
| No | 73 | ||||
| Cicatricial entropin and (or) trichiasis | |||||
| Yes | 33 | 0.774 | 0.373 | 0.038 | 2.168 (1.044–4.504) |
| No | 47 | ||||
| Incomplete eyelid closure | |||||
| Yes | 20 | 0.637 | 0.387 | 0.100 | 1.891 (0.885–4.040) |
| No | 60 | ||||
Secondary surgical procedure and outcomes
| First surgical result | Total | Secondary surgery | Surgical procedure | No. eyes | Complete success (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial success | 25 | 17 | Allogeneic CLET | 10 | 8 |
| Oral mucosa transplantation | 3 | 3 | |||
| Autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation | 4 | 3 | |||
| Failure | 15 | 10 | Allogeneic CLET | 7 | 4 |
| Oral mucosa transplantation | 3 | 3 |