Chee Geap Tay1, Vanessa Wan Mun Lee1, Lai Choo Ong1, Khean Jin Goh2, Hany Ariffin3, Choong Yi Fong1. 1. Division of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia. 2. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia. 3. Division of Paediatric Haematology Oncology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vincristine, an essential component of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) therapeutic protocols, is associated with dose-dependent neurotoxicity, but its long-term morbidity in treated children has not been clearly elucidated. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) among Malaysian childhood ALL survivors and its impact on motor function and quality of life. PROCEDURE: Survivors of childhood ALL aged 4-18 years who had completed chemotherapy for 2 years or more were evaluated for VIPN using both the clinical Total Neuropathy Score (cTNS) and nerve conduction studies. Motor function and quality of life of the survivors were assessed via the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Brief Form, Second Edition (BOT-2 Brief Form) and the Paediatric Quality of Life version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL4.0) questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and one survivors with a duration of follow-up ranging from 2.0 to 10.3 years were recruited. Twenty-seven (26.7%) had abnormal cTNS scores and 69 (68.3%) had electrophysiological evidence of neuropathy. Of these, 16 (15.8%) had combined clinical and electrophysiological neuropathy (VIPN). Those previously treated on the intermediate- or high-risk treatment stratification arms had a higher risk of developing VIPN (67.3 vs. 32.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 9.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-71.86; P = 0.014). Survivors with VIPN had significantly lower quality of life scores in the physical (P = 0.024) and social domains (P = 0.039) compared with peers without VIPN, but no association with poorer motor function was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen percent of ALL survivors had VIPN. VIPN should be increasingly recognised as a late effect of chemotherapy, as it significantly affects physical and social function quality of life.
BACKGROUND:Vincristine, an essential component of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) therapeutic protocols, is associated with dose-dependent neurotoxicity, but its long-term morbidity in treated children has not been clearly elucidated. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) among Malaysian childhood ALL survivors and its impact on motor function and quality of life. PROCEDURE: Survivors of childhood ALL aged 4-18 years who had completed chemotherapy for 2 years or more were evaluated for VIPN using both the clinical Total Neuropathy Score (cTNS) and nerve conduction studies. Motor function and quality of life of the survivors were assessed via the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Brief Form, Second Edition (BOT-2 Brief Form) and the Paediatric Quality of Life version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL4.0) questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and one survivors with a duration of follow-up ranging from 2.0 to 10.3 years were recruited. Twenty-seven (26.7%) had abnormal cTNS scores and 69 (68.3%) had electrophysiological evidence of neuropathy. Of these, 16 (15.8%) had combined clinical and electrophysiological neuropathy (VIPN). Those previously treated on the intermediate- or high-risk treatment stratification arms had a higher risk of developing VIPN (67.3 vs. 32.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 9.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-71.86; P = 0.014). Survivors with VIPN had significantly lower quality of life scores in the physical (P = 0.024) and social domains (P = 0.039) compared with peers without VIPN, but no association with poorer motor function was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen percent of ALL survivors had VIPN. VIPN should be increasingly recognised as a late effect of chemotherapy, as it significantly affects physical and social function quality of life.
Authors: Ellen M Lavoie Smith; Clare Kuisell; Grace A Kanzawa-Lee; Celia M Bridges; Paola Alberti; Guido Cavaletti; Rima Saad; Susanna Park Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 18.959
Authors: Tejaswi Kandula; Michelle Anne Farrar; Richard J Cohn; David Mizrahi; Kate Carey; Karen Johnston; Matthew C Kiernan; Arun V Krishnan; Susanna B Park Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Kari L Bjornard; Laura S Gilchrist; Hiroto Inaba; Barthelemy Diouf; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Daniel C Bowers; M Eileen Dolan; Nicole J Ullrich; William E Evans; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-09-01
Authors: Sascha Lieber; Victoria Ruscher; Jörn-Sven Kühl; Johannes Schulte; Markus Blankenburg; Tobias Reindl; Pablo Hernáiz Driever Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.553