Literature DB >> 28138595

Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: current status and new approaches.

Seung Hyun Lim1, Hae Min Lee1, Taeil Son1, Woo Jin Hyung2, Hyoung-Il Kim3.   

Abstract

Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro® multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site® system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; feasibility; fluorescence imaging; gastrectomy; learning curve

Year:  2016        PMID: 28138595      PMCID: PMC5244657          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  48 in total

1.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Seok Han; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hye Seong Ahn; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Song-Ee Baek; Joon Seok Lim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  B W Eom; H M Yoon; K W Ryu; J H Lee; S J Cho; J Y Lee; C G Kim; I J Choi; J S Lee; M C Kook; J Y Rhee; S R Park; Y W Kim
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Mariko Man-I; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Clinical outcome and clinicopathological characteristics of recurrence after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Fumihiro Yoshimura; Kazuki Inaba; Yuichiro Kawamura; Yoshinori Ishida; Keizo Taniguchi; Jun Isogaki; Seiji Satoh; Seiichiro Kanaya; Yoichi Sakurai; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Shiro Kikuchi; Nobue Futawatari; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Guoqin Wang; Leon Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kuo-Hung Huang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Wen-Liang Fang; Jen-Hao Chen; Su-Shun Lo; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot?

Authors:  Eric J Charles; J Hunter Mehaffey; Carlos A Tache-Leon; Peter T Hallowell; Robert G Sawyer; Zequan Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Kelly M Mahuron; Hobart W Harris; Patricia S O'Sullivan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Effects of long periods of pneumoperitoneum combined with the head-up position on heart rate-corrected QT interval during robotic gastrectomy: an observational study.

Authors:  Na Young Kim; Sun-Joon Bai; Hyoung-Il Kim; Jung Hwa Hong; Hoon Jae Nam; Jae Chul Koh; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Similar Operative Outcomes between the da Vinci Xi® and da Vinci Si® Systems in Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Seohee Choi; Chul-Kyu Roh; Won Jun Seo; Minah Cho; Taeil Son; Hyung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 5.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current evidence.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Won Jun Seo; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-07-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.