Literature DB >> 28138304

Radiation therapy and cancer control in developing countries: Can we save more lives?

Rajamanickam Baskar1, Koji Itahana2.   

Abstract

Globally, morbidity and mortality due to cancer are predicted to increase in both men and women in the coming decades. Furthermore, it is estimated that two thirds of these cancer-related deaths will occur in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). In addition to morbidity and mortality, cancer also causes an enormous economic burden, especially in developing countries. There are several treatment and management options for cancer including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, and palliative care. Radiotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) can be an effective treatment, especially for localized or solid cancers; about half of cancer patients receive radiation as a curative or palliative treatment. Because of its low cost, for patients from LMIC with inoperable tumors, RT may be the only option. With the overall increase in the number of cancer patients especially in resource-starved LMIC, the need for more RT facilities further affects the economic growth of those countries. Therefore, an advanced molecular-targeted and more integrated approach involving either RT alone or with surgery and improved cancer drug access worldwide are urgent needs for cancer care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cell death; Developing countries; Economic burden; Radiation therapy.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28138304      PMCID: PMC5278654          DOI: 10.7150/ijms.17288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Sci        ISSN: 1449-1907            Impact factor:   3.738


The Burden of Cancer

Recent estimates from the World Health Organization predict that the global incidence of cancer will increase by ~65% from 14 million in 2012 to more than 22 million by 2030 1, becoming a major public health problem in all regions of the world. Differences in cancer incidence and mortality rates have been noted in different regions of the world, with the highest rates occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). Each year, 5 million people die from cancer (10 percent of the 50 million deaths) in LMIC, which is second only to deaths from infectious diseases 2. Based on human development index (HDI), worldwide total incidence and mortality due to cancer in 2012 is given in Table 1 3. HDI is measured based on income level, education and life expectancy which indicates the socio-economic status of the country 4. Because cancer incidence increases with age, Bray and Møller predicted that the elderly will comprise 60% of cancer cases worldwide by 2050 and ~67% of those cases will occur in LMIC 5. As the incidence of cancer increases concomitant with the aging of the world's population, the costs of diagnosis and treatment will become a burden to the world economy.
Table 1

Worldwide total incidence and mortality from cancer in 2012 based on the Human Development Index (HDI) 3.

New cases (Millions)Mortality (Millions)
High Development Index7.93.9
Medium Development Index5.23.7
Low Development Index0.940.69
Overall14.18.2

Cancer and Radiotherapy

The various treatment modalities for cancer include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunetherapy, hormone therapy, surgery and palliative care 6-8. Radiation therapy or radiotherapy (RT) is currently one of the most widely used treatment options for cancer around the world because of its low cost; approximately 50% of patients undergo radiation treatment during the course of their disease (6, 9). While RT is the cheapest treatment modality overall, comprising only about 5% of the total cost of patient care, limited sources are available in LMIC 10. Although RT is a complex treatment, it can be effectively standardized and delivered to the majority of patients irrespective of their political/regional, socioeconomic, and cultural context 11-13. Studies conducted in Australia, supported by the results of studies in Canada and Sweden, reported that for every 1000 newly diagnosed cancer cases, 523 patients (52%) required RT, and about 120 patients (23%) needed repeated radiation exposure to obtain a cure 7, 14. However, an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA 2010) report suggested that in developing countries at least 60% of cancer patients require radiation treatment. Although 85% of world's population lives in LMIC, there are only 4,400 megavoltage radiation facilities available, which is far less than 35% of the world's RT facilities available in the other regions of the world 15. Since that report, the number of available facilities in LMIC might have increased by a few hundred, but that has been without much impact. Radiation therapy is used as a primary treatment for many cancers, also given as neo-adjuvant or adjuvant (before or after) with other types of treatments such as chemotherapy and surgery. Delaney et al 14 reported an ideal rate of RT utilization in Australian cancer patients based on the systematic search of published guidelines and literature. RT utilization rate is defined as the rate of cancer patients who will receive at least one course of radiation treatment during their lifetime. Based on the calculation, it has been indicated that 52% of cancer patients have to be treated by RT. Furthermore, cancers that show more than 50% of the ideal rate of RT utilization are breast, lung, prostate, urinary bladder, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, rectum, oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, salivary gland, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, unknown primary (head and neck), cervix, central nervous system and lymphoma. Comparison of these estimations with actual RT delivery rate suggest that some cancer types should be treated more by RT. Globally cancers are treated by radiation alone or with combination with other modalities effectively, but some cancers are not, because of few cancer cells that develop radiation resistant and cause a relapse. Furthermore, recently Ahmed et al 16 reported an intra-organ variation of the metastases treated by radiation based on the formation and location of the primary tumor. Therefore, attempts to combine radiotherapy with cellular and molecular targeted biological modalities which determine the sensitivity or resistance to ionizing radiation is an urgent unmet need. The purpose of this article is to explain how RT affects cancer cells to enable general practitioners, non-specialist clinicians, and other healthcare workers to advise cancer patients who come to them with questions about how RT can be a treatment strategy to cure cancer.

Types of radiation therapy

Soon after Roentgen discovered X-rays in 1985, radiation was used as a treatment for cancer 17, and eventually was identified as an effective treatment for tumors located in critical organs 18, 19. Cancer patients receive radiation treatment in the form of radionuclide implants (internal treatment) or as linear energy transfer (LET) radiation (external treatment) depending on the radiation source used. In radiation biology, particles emitted when atoms decay are defined as low or high LET radiation. LET is a term used in dosimetry, which is defined as the energy released by radiation over a defined distance (expressed in keV/ μm). At the same level of observed dose, high LET radiation was shown to be more effective than low LET radiation for cancer treatment. For RT, radiation is delivered primarily as high energy sources like photons (gamma and X-rays), charged particles (electrons), and protons. The physical energy that is transferred to cancer cells alters their sensitivity, survival, and metabolism, and disrupts the tumor microenvironment (TME) 6, 20. In external RT, high-energy rays (photons, protons or particle radiation) are delivered via a radiation beam from outside the body to the tumor. This is the most common approach, which offers a noninvasive alternative to surgery for vital organ preservation. To achieve cure, RT is delivered in multiple fractions based on the radiobiological nature of cancer and various normal tissues present in the path of radiation surrounding the cancer tissue. A typical RT fraction consists of daily (5days/week) exposure to 1.5 to 2 Gray (Gy) given over 5-7 weeks. In comparison to normal cells, most cancer cells proliferate rapidly; therefore, normal cells have time to repair the radiation damage before replication 6. Over the past 2-3 decades, RT technology has advanced to deliver the radiation at a higher dose more accurately targeting the tumor and sparing the surrounding normal tissues. Multiple technological improvements in engineering and computing have advanced radiation delivery capabilities such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a more recently developed technology that uses protons rather than photons (used in traditional external beam RT) to deliver the radiation dose. Although proton therapy minimizes the total radiation dose and side effects to the surrounding healthy normal tissues, there is limited clinical evidence that directly compares PBT with other types of photon-based RT approaches.

Mechanisms of radiation-induced cell death

Cancer cells are resistant to anti-growth signals that prevent abnormal cell division. The main target of radiation in cells is the genome, i.e., DNA. Radiation acts as a physical agent that damages DNA directly or produces free radicals (charged particles) that damage the cellular DNA 21, 22. Depending on the observed dose in the cell, DNA damage occurs as single-strand and double-strand DNA breaks, DNA base changes, and DNA-protein cross links 23, 24. In addition, ionizing radiation damages cells by altering protein expression that affects signaling pathways 20, 25, 26 involved in damage repair mechanisms (Figure 1). Cellular DNA damage activates the expression of ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related) kinases that are involved in the DNA damage response, which in turn induces cell cycle arrest and activates various downstream targets involved in DNA repair 27, 28, 29. The ability or inability of repair mechanisms to fix damaged cellular DNA decides the fate of the cell: survival or death.
Figure 1

Irradiation damages the genome (DNA) of the cancer cells producing single strand breaks (SSB) or double strand breaks (DSB), which are repaired by several kinds of repair proteins. If cancer cells receive severe irreparable DNA damage, the cells undergo either cellular senescence or several types of cell death, dependent on the cell context.

Types of cell death

RT damages cells by various mechanisms as discussed above; however, the cell death response to irradiation is complex, and depending on the extent of damage, cells die at various intervals and by various mechanisms 30. The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) identified thirteen types of cell death 31. RT mainly kills cell through the process of apoptosis; cells also die via activation of non-apoptotic signaling pathways such as mitotic catastrophe (MC) pathway, necrosis, autophagy, and immunogenic cell death (ICD) (Figure 1). RT also induces permanent cell cycle arrest called cellular senescence which is an intrinsic tumor suppressive mechanism triggered by severe or irreparable DNA damage (Figure 1). Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that represents a crucial mechanism to avoid accumulation of cells with DNA damage and mutations, and is a major cell death mechanism involved in RT-related cell death. In MC, cancer cells die with premature or inappropriate entry of cells into mitosis and aberrant chromosome segregation due to severe DNA damage by RT. DNA damage often induces MC in cancers which have defective cell cycle checkpoints and resistant to apoptosis 32. In necrosis, damaged cells swell with the subsequent breakdown of the cell membrane and disintegration of cellular organelles. Although necrosis has been long considered as an accidental cell death, recent studies suggest that there are several genetically regulated form of necrosis. Severe DNA damage can induce regulated necrosis in Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-dependent manner 32. Autophagy is an important catabolic process in which the cell digests itself via degradation of intracellular components such as proteins and organelles. Although autophagy mainly contributes to cell survival, it can lead to Type II programmed cell death depending on the cell context. Several reports suggest that RT induces autophagy in cancers, and in certain conditions, autophagy-inducing agents can act as radiosensitizers 33. Cancer cells that receive severe or irreparable DNA damage by RT undergo permanent cell cycle arrest called cellular senescence rather than cell death depending on the cell context. Senescent cells are still alive but not able to duplicate, therefore, it acts as an anti-cancer mechanism 34. In ICD, instead of undergoing conventional forms of apoptosis, damaged cancer cells by RT emit a specific combination of signals that induce a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response leading to cancer cell killing and also the killing of unirradiated tumor cells systemically 35. Another mechanism is known as radiation-induced bystander cell killing, or abscopal response, in which non-irradiated cancer cells in proximity to irradiated cancer cells die via signals received from the damaged cancer cells.

Conclusion

The increase in the global aging population and related growing burden of cancer places increased pressure on health systems to provide comprehensive and effective cancer treatments. In recent years the improved treatment methods to control this disease have given hope to cancer patients. Furthermore, a number of potential improvements in treatment modalities that target cancer cell pro-survival molecular pathways show promise for sharply reducing the cancer burden not only in developed countries and also in LMIC. Fractionated RT has challenges for causing damage to normal cells as well as cancer cells, depending on the dose/method of delivery, and location of cancer in the tissue/organ. In addition to technological advancements, the explosion of older populations and increase in obesity and infections are driving intensive and sustained research efforts against cancer that will continue to be critical. Therefore, development of an advanced integrated approach involving RT, surgery, and drug treatment is urgently needed worldwide for reducing the burden of cancer.
  28 in total

1.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Geoff Delaney; Susannah Jacob; Carolyn Featherstone; Michael Barton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Radiation-induced cell signaling: inside-out and outside-in.

Authors:  Kristoffer Valerie; Adly Yacoub; Michael P Hagan; David T Curiel; Paul B Fisher; Steven Grant; Paul Dent
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Role of radiotherapy in cancer control in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Michael B Barton; Michael Frommer; Jesmin Shafiq
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Various modes of cell death induced by DNA damage.

Authors:  O Surova; B Zhivotovsky
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  Radiation as an immune modulator.

Authors:  Byron Burnette; Ralph R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Isoform-specific activation of protein kinase c in irradiated human fibroblasts and their bystander cells.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar; Adayabalam S Balajee; Charles R Geard; M Prakash Hande
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 7.  The Bangladesh paradox: exceptional health achievement despite economic poverty.

Authors:  A Mushtaque R Chowdhury; Abbas Bhuiya; Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury; Sabrina Rasheed; Zakir Hussain; Lincoln C Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Radiosensitivity Differences Between Liver Metastases Based on Primary Histology Suggest Implications for Clinical Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Kamran A Ahmed; Jimmy J Caudell; Ghassan El-Haddad; Anders E Berglund; Eric A Welsh; Binglin Yue; Sarah E Hoffe; Arash O Naghavi; Yazan A Abuodeh; Jessica M Frakes; Steven A Eschrich; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Laurence H Pearl; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Repurposing Drugs for Cancer Radiotherapy: Early Successes and Emerging Opportunities.

Authors:  Mohammad K Khan; Tahseen H Nasti; Zachary S Buchwald; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  Economic Perspective of Cancer Care and Its Consequences for Vulnerable Groups.

Authors:  Joerg Haier; Juergen Schaefers
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Mitochondria as Target for Tumor Management of Hemangioendothelioma.

Authors:  Gayle M Gordillo; Ayan Biswas; Kanhaiya Singh; Abhishek Sen; Poornachander R Guda; Caroline Miller; Xueliang Pan; Savita Khanna; Enrique Cadenas; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 4.  Radiotherapy resistance: identifying universal biomarkers for various human cancers.

Authors:  Irina Larionova; Militsa Rakina; Elena Ivanyuk; Yulia Trushchuk; Alena Chernyshova; Evgeny Denisov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 5.  Molecular Interactions of Autophagy with the Immune System and Cancer.

Authors:  Yunho Jin; Yunkyung Hong; Chan Young Park; Yonggeun Hong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  History and Current State of Radiation Oncology Services and Practice in Jordan.

Authors:  Jamal Khader; Abdelatif Al Mousa; Samir Al-Kayed; Hana Mahasneh; Rasmi Mubaidin; Nabeel Al Nassir; Sami Khatib; Adnan Qasem; Inad Haddadin; Elayan Elayan; Sondos Al Khatib
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-06

7.  Downregulation of H19 decreases the radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Wenguang Luo; Wei Liu; Jie Yao; Wenjing Zhu; Hongyan Zhang; Qi Sheng; Lin Wang; Lei Lv; Liting Qian
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.

Authors:  Rui-Xue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 9.  Preparation, toxicity reduction and radiation therapy application of gold nanorods.

Authors:  Lina Xie; Xujia Zhang; Chengchao Chu; Yingqi Dong; Tianzi Zhang; Xinyue Li; Gang Liu; Wen Cai; Suxia Han
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 10.435

10.  The Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on the Incidence of Diarrhea in Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Navin Kumar Devaraj; Subapriya Suppiah; Sajesh K Veettil; Siew Mooi Ching; Kai Wei Lee; Rohit Kunnath Menon; Man Jun Soo; Inas Deuraseh; Fan Kee Hoo; Dhashani Sivaratnam
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.