Literature DB >> 28137811

Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014.

Helio S Sader1, Mariana Castanheira2, Rodrigo E Mendes2, Robert K Flamm2, Ronald N Jones2.   

Abstract

Cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) is currently under clinical development for use at a dosage of 2 g/2 g every 8 h. A total of 7,981 isolates were collected from 146 medical centers (39 countries) in 2014 as a part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, and their susceptibilities to cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at fixed concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/ml) were tested by a reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were mainly from patients with pneumonia (29.5%) and bloodstream infections (26.9%). Cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml) and cefepime inhibited 96.9 and 87.9% of Enterobacteriaceae strains at ≤8 μg/ml. The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae strains was comparable to that of meropenem (96.7% of isolates were susceptible) and greater than that of piperacillin-tazobactam (87.7% susceptible). All Enterobacteriaceae species from the United States except Klebsiella pneumoniae had >99.0% of isolates inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml. The prevalence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-screening-positive phenotype was the highest among Escherichia coli isolates in China (66.3%) and among K. pneumoniae isolates (58.0%) in Latin America. Cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml inhibited 98.7 and 71.3% of ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and K. pneumoniae strains, respectively. Meropenem showed limited activity against ESBL-screening-positive phenotype K. pneumoniae strains (69.6% susceptible). Cefepime-tazobactam was active against Enterobacter spp. (MIC50 and MIC90, 0.06 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively), including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates (96.1% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml). The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (82.4 and 91.6% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 and ≤16/8 μg/ml, respectively) was comparable to that of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (79.2% susceptible). In summary, cefepime-tazobactam was highly active against P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae strains, including ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacter spp. These results support the further clinical development of the cefepime-tazobactam combination.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cefepime-tazobactam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28137811      PMCID: PMC5365660          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02409-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic rationale for cefepime dosing regimens in intensive care units.

Authors:  Juliana F Roos; Jurgen Bulitta; Jeffrey Lipman; Carl M J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Evaluating outcomes of alternative dosing strategies for cefepime: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah V Burgess; Vincent H Mabasa; Ivy Chow; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Meta-analysis of a possible signal of increased mortality associated with cefepime use.

Authors:  Peter W Kim; Yu-te Wu; Charles Cooper; George Rochester; Thamban Valappil; Yan Wang; Cynthia Kornegay; Sumathi Nambiar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms isolated from patients hospitalised with pneumonia in US and European hospitals: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Interactions of tazobactam and clavulanate with inducibly- and constitutively-expressed Class I beta-lactamases.

Authors:  M Akova; Y Yang; D M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Cefepime/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients: a comparative study. The French Cefepime Study Group.

Authors:  C Cordonnier; R Herbrecht; J L Pico; M Gardembas; A Delmer; M Delain; P Moreau; S Ladeb; V Nalet; C Rollin; J J Gres
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Potency and spectrum trends for cefepime tested against 65746 clinical bacterial isolates collected in North American medical centers: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998-2003).

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Thomas R Fritsche; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 8.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 9.  Clinical outcomes with extended or continuous versus short-term intravenous infusion of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Giannoula S Tansarli; Kazuro Ikawa; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Determining a clinical framework for use of cefepime and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors in the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Hien M Nguyen; Kileen L Shier; Christopher J Graber
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  10 in total

1.  Unorthodox Parenteral β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Flouting Antimicrobial Stewardship and Compromising Patient Care.

Authors:  Snehal Palwe; Balaji Veeraraghavan; Hariharan Periasamy; Kshama Khobragade; Arun S Kharat
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In Vivo Activity of WCK 4282 (High-Dose Cefepime/Tazobactam) against Serine-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Neutropenic Murine Lung Infection Model.

Authors:  Maxwell J Lasko; Kamilia Abdelraouf; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Enmetazobactam Combined with Cefepime in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model.

Authors:  Fabian Bernhard; Rajesh Odedra; Sylvie Sordello; Rossella Cardin; Samantha Franzoni; Cédric Charrier; Adam Belley; Peter Warn; Matthias Machacek; Philipp Knechtle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Authors:  Dafna Yahav; Christian G Giske; Alise Grāmatniece; Henrietta Abodakpi; Vincent H Tam; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Determination of Disk Diffusion and MIC Quality Control Guidelines for High-Dose Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282), a Novel Antibacterial Combination Consisting of a β-Lactamase Inhibitor and a Fourth-Generation Cephalosporin.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Michael D Huband; Helio S Sader; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Single-Center Investigation of the Pharmacokinetics of WCK 4282 (Cefepime-Tazobactam Combination) in Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Richard A Preston; Grigor Mamikonyan; Mushtaque Mastim; Dyal Garg; Christopher J Kemper; Allan Xu; Ravindra Yeole; Rajesh Chavan; H David Friedland; Ashima Bhatia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics and Effective Antibiotherapy.

Authors:  Adriana Aurelia Chiș; Luca Liviu Rus; Claudiu Morgovan; Anca Maria Arseniu; Adina Frum; Andreea Loredana Vonica-Țincu; Felicia Gabriela Gligor; Maria Lucia Mureșan; Carmen Maximiliana Dobrea
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 8.  The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Authors:  Krisztina M Papp-Wallace
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.889

9.  Epidemiology and Diagnostics of Carbapenem Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Patrice Nordmann; Laurent Poirel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Detection of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae on the basis of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry by using supervised machine learning approach.

Authors:  Tsi-Shu Huang; Susan Shin-Jung Lee; Chia-Chien Lee; Fu-Chuen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.