Literature DB >> 16105569

Potency and spectrum trends for cefepime tested against 65746 clinical bacterial isolates collected in North American medical centers: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998-2003).

Helio S Sader1, Thomas R Fritsche, Ronald N Jones.   

Abstract

We evaluated the antimicrobial spectrum and potency of cefepime and selected comparators agents against clinical bacterial strains collected in North America over a 6-year period (1998-2003). Isolates were consecutively collected from bloodstream (44%), respiratory tract (41%), urinary tract (6%), and skin/soft tissue (5%) infections in 48 medical centers. Isolates were susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods in a central laboratory. Oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci were excluded from the analysis. Imipenem (MIC90 = 1 microg/mL, 99.9% susceptible) was the most active compound tested against Enterobacteriaceae (22860 isolates tested) followed by cefepime (MIC90 = 0.25 microg/mL, 99.5% susceptible) > amikacin (99.4% susceptible) > ceftriaxone (95.6% susceptible) > aztreonam (95.1% susceptible). Among comparators, the lowest susceptibility rate for Enterobacteriaceae was observed with ciprofloxacin (92.8% susceptible). Imipenem was also the most active compound against ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli (99.3% and 100% susceptible, respectively), followed by amikacin (81.4% and 97.2% susceptible, respectively) and cefepime (92.5% and 93.8% susceptible, respectively). Cefepime activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (85.2% susceptible) was similar to that of imipenem (86.9% susceptible). Against oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, cefepime (MIC90 = 4 microg/mL, 100.0% susceptible) was 4-fold more active than ceftazidime (MIC90 = 16 microg/mL, 86.4% susceptible) and showed a higher susceptibility rate than ciprofloxacin (93.2% susceptible). Cefepime was the most active compound tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90 = 1 microg/mL, 97.4% susceptible), ranked after gatifloxacin and levofloxacin (99.2% susceptible). The activity of cefepime remained stable during the study period evaluated with the susceptibility rates varying from 99.3% to 99.8% among the Enterobacteriaceae and 84.4% to 88.4% among P. aeruginosa isolates. In summary, cefepime has retained broad activity and spectrum against Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, and Gram-positive cocci (except oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci) isolated from North American medical centers in the 1998-2003 period. Continued resistance surveillance is critical to monitor the effectiveness of widely used parenteral antimicrobial agents such as cefepime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105569     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  15 in total

Review 1.  Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Federico Perez; Andrea M Hujer; Kristine M Hujer; Brooke K Decker; Philip N Rather; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Red man syndrome adverse reaction following intravenous infusion of cefepime.

Authors:  George Panos; Dionysios C Watson; Maria Sargianou; Dionysios Kampiotis; Paraskevi Chra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamic target attainment for various ceftazidime dosing schemes in high-flux hemodialysis.

Authors:  Angela S Loo; Michael Neely; Evan J Anderson; Cybele Ghossein; Milena M McLaughlin; Marc H Scheetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cefepime dosing in the morbidly obese patient population.

Authors:  Barrie S Rich; Rebecca Keel; Vanessa P Ho; Harma Turbendian; Cheguevara I Afaneh; Gregory F Dakin; Alfons Pomp; David P Nicolau; Philip S Barie
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Mariana Castanheira; Rodrigo E Mendes; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) Antimicrobial Activity against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria Collected Worldwide in 2015.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Mariana Castanheira; Michael Huband; Ronald N Jones; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Bacterial resistance surveillance in China: a report from Mohnarin 2004-2005.

Authors:  Y H Xiao; J Wang; Y Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  ESBL and MBL in Cefepime Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An Update from a Rural Area in Northern India.

Authors:  Aarti Kotwal; Debasis Biswas; Barnali Kakati; Malvika Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 9.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Cefepime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Ehimare Akhabue; Marie Synnestvedt; Mark G Weiner; Warren B Bilker; Ebbing Lautenbach
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.