Literature DB >> 28137751

Lead extraction with high frequency laser sheaths: a single-centre experience.

Simon Pecha1, Matthias Linder1, Nils Gosau2, Liesa Castro1, Julia Vogler2, Stephan Willems2, Hermann Reichenspurner1, Samer Hakmi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Extraction of chronically implanted cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices leads can be difficult. Excimer laser-assisted extraction with 40 Hz sheaths has shown good results in challenging cases. In 2012, a new 80 Hz high-frequency laser sheath became available that delivers twice as many pulses per second. Here, we report our clinical experience with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheath.
METHODS: Between January 2012 and August 2016, 292 leads were treated in 151 patients using 80 Hz GlideLight laser sheath. Lead extraction indications included systemic infection or lead endocarditis n =  35 (23.2%), local infection n =  73 (48.3%), lead dysfunction n =  32 (21.2%), system upgrade n =  5 (3.3%), tricuspid regurgitation n =  3 (2.0%) and other indications n =  3 (2.0). All patient-related and procedural data were collected into a database and analysed.
RESULTS: Mean patient's age was 66.2 ± 14.4 years, 73.5% were male. Ninety-one (31.2%) atrial, 159 (54.4%) ventricular and 42 (14.4%) coronary sinus leads had to be extracted. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 98.0 ± 65.2 months. Mean laser treatment time was 67.5 ± 71.3 s, mean laser pulses delivered were 5130 ± 6592. Clinical success was achieved in 99.3% of the cases, while complete procedural success was observed in 96.7%. A failure of extraction was seen in 2 (1.3%) patients. An overall complication rate of 2.0%, including two major (1.3%) and one minor (0.7%) complications, was observed. No periprocedural mortality was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: The new GlideLight high-frequency laser sheath allows for a high safety and efficacy in extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker- and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High frequency laser sheaths; ICD lead extraction; Laser lead extraction; Pacemaker lead extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28137751     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

Review 1.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Tibor Ziegelhoeffer; Yalin Yildirim; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Stephan Willems; Hermann Reichenspurner; Heiko Burger; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

3.  Are Endovascular Interventions for Central Vein Obstructions due to Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices Effective?

Authors:  Charalampos Sotiriadis; Stephanie Volpi; Pauline Douek; Amine Chouiter; Olivier Muller; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-07-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.