Literature DB >> 28135566

Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Veysel Cankurtaran1, Mehmet Citirik, Mert Simsek, Kemal Tekin, Mehmet Yasin Teke.   

Abstract

Retinal detachment is the separation of the sensory retina from the retinal pigment epithelium by subretinal fluid. There are several types of retinal re-attachment surgery, including scleral buckling (SB), pneumatic retinopexy, and vitrectomy (with or without SB). The objective of this study was to compare anatomical and visual outcomes between patients with pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil (SO) or perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas tamponade and pseudophakic RRD patients who underwent SB surgery. We evaluated retrospectively 101 pseudophakic RRD patients from a single center. The patients were classified into three groups according to the surgical procedure performed: PPV + Silicone - patients who underwent PPV with SO tamponade; PPV + Gas - patients who underwent PPV with perfluoropropane gas tamponade; and SB group - patients who underwent SB surgery. The groups were compared with regard to primary and final anatomical and visual outcomes. The number of patients in PPV + Silicone, PPV + Gas, and SB group was 39 (38.6%), 32 (31.7%), and 30 (29.7%), respectively. The mean follow-up period in PPV + Silicone, PPV + Gas, and SB group was 33.95 ± 23.58, 32.62 ± 10.95, and 33.76 ± 16.62 months, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups neither with regard to primary and final anatomical and visual success rates nor in relation to the recurrence rate of retinal detachment. According to our anatomical and visual outcome results, either of the three methods (i.e., PPV + Silicone, PPV + Gas, or SB) can be used in the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135566      PMCID: PMC5341782          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2017.1560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  34 in total

1.  Current popularity of pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  W E Benson; P Chan; S Sharma; W B Snyder; M A Bloome; D G Birch
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of retinal detachments following cataract surgery.

Authors:  M A Speicher; A D Fu; J P Martin; M A von Fricken
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): Risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7.

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Heinrich Heimann; Hans Hoerauf; Peter Walter; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Nicole Heussen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group.

Authors:  P E Tornambe; G F Hilton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Periklis D Brazitikos; Sofia Androudi; William G Christen; Nikolaos Tr Stangos
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  An evidence-based analysis of surgical interventions for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Gus Gazzard; Ajeet M Wagle; Jimmy Lim; Kah-Guan Au Eong
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-10

7.  Update on a long-term, prospective study of capsulotomy and retinal detachment rates after cataract surgery.

Authors:  G Olsen; R J Olson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  [Vitrectomy without scleral buckle versus ab-externo approach for pseudophakic retinal detachment: comparative retrospective study].

Authors:  J F Le Rouic; F Behar-Cohen; F Azan; S Bertin; O Bettembourg; F Rumen; C Caudron; G Renard; D Chauvaud
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.818

9.  Vitrectomy with silicone oil or long-acting gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of additional and long-term follow-up. Silicone Study report 11.

Authors:  G W Abrams; S P Azen; B W McCuen; H W Flynn; M Y Lai; S J Ryan
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Reassessment of pneumatic retinopexy for primary treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Eyal Cohen; Amir Zerach; Michael Mimouni; Adiel Barak
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Fovea-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: impact of clinical factors including time to surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes.

Authors:  Irene T Lee; Shaun I R Lampen; Tien P Wong; James C Major; Charles C Wykoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Modified Controlled Encircling Scleral Buckle for Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Dimitra Skondra; Corey Westerfeld; Demetrios G Vavvas
Journal:  J Vitreoretin Dis       Date:  2017-08-21

3.  Influence of submacular fluid on recovery of retinal function and structure after successful rhegmatogenous retinal reattachment.

Authors:  Misato Kobayashi; Takeshi Iwase; Kentaro Yamamoto; Eimei Ra; Norifumi Hirata; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.