Literature DB >> 2662100

Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group.

P E Tornambe, G F Hilton.   

Abstract

Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with scleral buckling in a multicenter (7 centers), randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 198 patients. Admission criteria included detachments with retinal break(s) no greater than 1 clock hour in size, within the superior two thirds of the fundus, without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All patients were followed for at least 6 months. Scleral buckling was compared with pneumatic retinopexy with regard to single-operation reattachment (82 versus 73%), reattachment with one operation and postoperative laser/cryotherapy (84 versus 81%), overall reattachment with reoperations (98 versus 99%), final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eye with preoperative detachment of the macula for 2 weeks or less (56 versus 80%), PVR (5 versus 3%), and new retinal breaks (13 versus 23%). Complications, including reoperations, as measured by the "score" system, were similar. The anatomic results of the two operations were not significantly different (P greater than 0.05), but pneumatic retinopexy had less morbidity and better postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.01). Pneumatic retinopexy is recommended for cases meeting the admission criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662100     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32820-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  38 in total

Review 1.  View 3: The case for pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  E R Holz; W F Mieler
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  The complication of pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  G F Hilton; P E Tornambe; D A Brinton; T P Flood; S Green; W S Grizzard; M E Hammer; S R Leff; L Mascuilli; C M Morgan
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1990

3.  Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rajeev H Muni; Carolina L M Francisconi; Tina Felfeli; Michael Y K Mak; Alan R Berger; David T Wong; Filiberto Altomare; Louis R Giavedoni; Radha P Kohly; Peter J Kertes; Natalia Figueiredo; Fei Zuo; Kevin E Thorpe; Roxane J Hillier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 4.  [Scleral buckling surgery and pneumatic retinopexy. Techniques, indications and results].

Authors:  H Hoerauf; H Heimann; L Hansen; H Laqua
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The treatment of bullous rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  D Wong; A H Chignell; D V Inglesby; B C Little; W Franks
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  One-year outcomes after retinal detachment surgery among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shelley Day; Daniel S Grossman; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Frank A Sloan; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  A 37-year-old woman with spontaneous lens dislocation after vitrectomy for retinal reattachment.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chalioulias; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Ioannis Athanasiadis; Yajati K Ghosh; Ajai K Tyagi
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02-10

Review 8.  Retinal detachment.

Authors:  David Steel
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  The risk of a new retinal break or detachment following cataract surgery in eyes that had undergone repair of phakic break or detachment: a hypothesis of a causal relationship to cataract surgery.

Authors:  M Gilbert Grand
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

10.  Primary 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Authors:  Fatih Horozoglu; Ates Yanyali; Erkan Celik; Banu Aytug; Ahmet F Nohutcu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.