Literature DB >> 28135395

Mammographic breast density is associated with the development of contralateral breast cancer.

Akshara Raghavendra1, Arup K Sinha1,2, Huong T Le-Petross3, Naveen Garg3, Limin Hsu1, Modesto Patangan1, Therese Bartholomew Bevers4, Yu Shen5, Arun Banu1, Debu Tripathy1, Isabelle Bedrosian4, Carlos H Barcenas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with dense mammographic breast density (BD) have a 2-fold increased risk of developing primary breast cancer (BC). The authors hypothesized that dense mammographic BD also is associated with an increased risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC).
METHODS: Among female patients treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for sporadic, AJCC stage I to stage III BC between January 1997 and December 2012, the authors identified patients who had developed metachronous CBC (cases) and selected 1:2 matched controls who did not develop CBC using incidence density sampling, matched on attainted age, year of diagnosis, and hormone receptor status of the first BC. Mammographic BD, assessed at the time of first BC diagnosis, was categorized as "nondense" (American College of Radiology breast categories of fatty or scattered density) or "dense" (American College of Radiology categories of heterogeneously dense or extremely dense). Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 229 cases and 451 controls were evaluated. Among the cases, approximately 39.3% had nondense breast tissue and 60.7% had dense breast tissue. Among controls, approximately 48.3% had nondense breast tissue and 51.7% had dense breast tissue. After adjustment for potential prognostic risk factors for BC, the odds of developing CBC were found to be significantly higher for patients with dense breasts (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.64 [P<.01]) than for those with nondense breasts. Patients who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy were less likely to develop CBC.
CONCLUSIONS: In women with primary BC, mammographic BD appears to be a risk factor for the development of CBC. Cancer 2017;123:1935-1940.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contralateral breast cancer; dense; mammographic breast density; nondense

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135395      PMCID: PMC5577931          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.

Authors:  R M Mickey; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A computer program for incidence density sampling of controls in case-control studies nested within occupational cohort studies.

Authors:  J J Beaumont; K Steenland; A Minton; S Meyer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Digitized mammography: a clinical trial of postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive raloxifene, estrogen, or placebo.

Authors:  M Freedman; J San Martin; J O'Gorman; S Eckert; M E Lippman; S C Lo; E L Walls; J Zeng
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.

Authors:  Victoria A Kirsh; Anna M Chiarelli; Sarah A Edwards; Frances P O'Malley; Rene S Shumak; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; M Szklo; D R Olson; M Salane; J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-neu expression in first primary breast cancers and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Babette Siebold Saltzman; Kathleen E Malone; Jean A McDougall; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Effect of systemic adjuvant treatment on risk for contralateral breast cancer in the Women's Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  Lisbeth Bertelsen; Leslie Bernstein; Jørgen H Olsen; Lene Mellemkjaer; Robert W Haile; Charles F Lynch; Kathleen E Malone; Hoda Anton-Culver; Jane Christensen; Bryan Langholz; Duncan C Thomas; Colin B Begg; Marinela Capanu; Bent Ejlertsen; Marilyn Stovall; John D Boice; Roy E Shore; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Ronald E Gangnon; Veronica Burt; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Robert D Wellman; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Relation of risk of contralateral breast cancer to the interval since the first primary tumour.

Authors:  C Rubino; R Arriagada; S Delaloge; M G Lê
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Change of mammographic density predicts the risk of contralateral breast cancer--a case-control study.

Authors:  Maria E C Sandberg; Jingmei Li; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Marzana Chowdhury; David Euhus; Maureen O'Donnell; Tracy Onega; Pankaj K Choudhary; Swati Biswas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids decrease mammary tumor growth, multiorgan metastasis and enhance survival.

Authors:  Saraswoti Khadge; Geoffrey M Thiele; John Graham Sharp; Timothy R McGuire; Lynell W Klassen; Paul N Black; Concetta C DiRusso; Leah Cook; James E Talmadge
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Rebecca E Smith; Louise M Henderson; Wenyan Zhao; Danielle D Durham; Karen Schifferdecker; Celia Kaplan; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Tracy Onega; Nila H Alsheik; Brian L Sprague; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Jill Budesky; Dianne Johnson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Association of contralateral breast cancer risk with mammographic density defined at higher-than-conventional intensity thresholds.

Authors:  Gordon P Watt; Julia A Knight; Tuong L Nguyen; Anne S Reiner; Kathleen E Malone; Esther M John; Charles F Lynch; Jennifer D Brooks; Meghan Woods; Xiaolin Liang; Leslie Bernstein; Malcolm C Pike; John L Hopper; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 7.316

6.  Reproducible automated breast density measure with no ionizing radiation using fat-water decomposition MRI.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Alison T Stopeck; Yi Gao; Marilyn T Marron; Betsy C Wertheim; Maria I Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Denise J Roe; Fang Wang; Gertraud Maskarinec; Cynthia A Thomson; Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The association of mammographic density with risk of contralateral breast cancer and change in density with treatment in the WECARE study.

Authors:  Julia A Knight; Kristina M Blackmore; Jing Fan; Kathleen E Malone; Esther M John; Charles F Lynch; Celine M Vachon; Leslie Bernstein; Jennifer D Brooks; Anne S Reiner; Xiaolin Liang; Meghan Woods; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hsin Yuan; Hui-Chen Hsu; Ying-Yuan Chen; Chia-Hung Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sara De Giorgis; Nicole Brunetti; Jeries Zawaideh; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-04

10.  Prognostic Influence of Preoperative Mammographic Breast Density in Operable Invasive Female Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ki-Tae Hwang; A Jung Chu; Jongjin Kim; Jong Yoon Lee; Ji Hyun Chang; Sohee Oh; Young A Kim; Jiwoong Jung; Bumjo Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.