Literature DB >> 2813514

Radiation doses and detriment from chest x-ray examinations.

W Huda1, G A Sandison, R F Palser, D Savoie.   

Abstract

Radiation dose distributions for chest x-ray examinations have been measured in a Rando phantom for three views (AP, PA and lateral) as a function of kVp. On the basis of these data, the relationship between the surface dose, energy imparted and the effective dose equivalent have been determined. The mean energy imparted in a typical chest examination (PA + lateral views at 100 kVp) is 1.7 mJ and the corresponding value of the effective dose equivalent, HE, is 42 muSv. The measured radiation doses associated with chest x-rays were compared with the predictions of Monte Carlo calculations. The average difference between Monte Carlo and measured data for the HE was only about 16%. Demographic features (age/sex) of patients undergoing chest x-rays were investigated, and a population irradiation factor (PIF) introduced to estimate the radiation detriment to this population. The probability of expressed radiation-induced detriment to the patient population from chest x-ray examinations was computed to be about one half of that expected for a normal adult (working) population receiving the same dose. The radiation risk associated with chest x-ray examinations for this population was estimated to be less than 0.3 fatal cancers plus serious genetic disorders in the first two generations per million patient examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2813514     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/34/10/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Fourier X-ray scattering radiography yields bone structural information.

Authors:  Han Wen; Eric E Bennett; Monica M Hegedus; Stanislas Rapacchi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Effective dose--how effective for patients?

Authors:  G Drexler; W Panzer; N Petoussi; M Zankl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.925

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.