BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a consequence of defects in diverse metabolic pathways that involve hepatic accumulation of triglycerides. Features of these aberrations might determine whether NAFLD progresses to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We investigated whether the diverse defects observed in patients with NAFLD are caused by different NAFLD subtypes with specific serum metabolomic profiles, and whether these can distinguish patients with NASH from patients with simple steatosis. METHODS: We collected liver and serum from methionine adenosyltransferase 1a knockout (MAT1A-KO) mice, which have chronically low levels of hepatic S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and spontaneously develop steatohepatitis, as well as C57Bl/6 mice (controls); the metabolomes of all samples were determined. We also analyzed serum metabolomes of 535 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (353 with simple steatosis and 182 with NASH) and compared them with serum metabolomes of mice. MAT1A-KO mice were also given SAMe (30 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks); liver samples were collected and analyzed histologically for steatohepatitis. RESULTS: Livers of MAT1A-KO mice were characterized by high levels of triglycerides, diglycerides, fatty acids, ceramides, and oxidized fatty acids, as well as low levels of SAMe and downstream metabolites. There was a correlation between liver and serum metabolomes. We identified a serum metabolomic signature associated with MAT1A-KO mice that also was present in 49% of the patients; based on this signature, we identified 2 NAFLD subtypes. We identified specific panels of markers that could distinguish patients with NASH from patients with simple steatosis for each subtype of NAFLD. Administration of SAMe reduced features of steatohepatitis in MAT1A-KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of serum metabolomes of patients with NAFLD and MAT1A-KO mice with steatohepatitis, we identified 2 major subtypes of NAFLD and markers that differentiate steatosis from NASH in each subtype. These might be used to monitor disease progression and identify therapeutic targets for patients.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a consequence of defects in diverse metabolic pathways that involve hepatic accumulation of triglycerides. Features of these aberrations might determine whether NAFLD progresses to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We investigated whether the diverse defects observed in patients with NAFLD are caused by different NAFLD subtypes with specific serum metabolomic profiles, and whether these can distinguish patients with NASH from patients with simple steatosis. METHODS: We collected liver and serum from methionine adenosyltransferase 1a knockout (MAT1A-KO) mice, which have chronically low levels of hepatic S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and spontaneously develop steatohepatitis, as well as C57Bl/6 mice (controls); the metabolomes of all samples were determined. We also analyzed serum metabolomes of 535 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (353 with simple steatosis and 182 with NASH) and compared them with serum metabolomes of mice. MAT1A-KO mice were also given SAMe (30 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks); liver samples were collected and analyzed histologically for steatohepatitis. RESULTS: Livers of MAT1A-KO mice were characterized by high levels of triglycerides, diglycerides, fatty acids, ceramides, and oxidized fatty acids, as well as low levels of SAMe and downstream metabolites. There was a correlation between liver and serum metabolomes. We identified a serum metabolomic signature associated with MAT1A-KO mice that also was present in 49% of the patients; based on this signature, we identified 2 NAFLD subtypes. We identified specific panels of markers that could distinguish patients with NASH from patients with simple steatosis for each subtype of NAFLD. Administration of SAMe reduced features of steatohepatitis in MAT1A-KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of serum metabolomes of patients with NAFLD and MAT1A-KO mice with steatohepatitis, we identified 2 major subtypes of NAFLD and markers that differentiate steatosis from NASH in each subtype. These might be used to monitor disease progression and identify therapeutic targets for patients.
Authors: Ainara Cano; Xabier Buqué; Maite Martínez-Uña; Igor Aurrekoetxea; Ariane Menor; Juan L García-Rodríguez; Shelly C Lu; M Luz Martínez-Chantar; José M Mato; Begoña Ochoa; Patricia Aspichueta Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: S C Lu; L Alvarez; Z Z Huang; L Chen; W An; F J Corrales; M A Avila; G Kanel; J M Mato Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-04-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dario Greco; Anna Kotronen; Jukka Westerbacka; Oscar Puig; Perttu Arkkila; Tuula Kiviluoto; Saara Laitinen; Maria Kolak; Rachel M Fisher; Anders Hamsten; Petri Auvinen; Hannele Yki-Järvinen Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: J Barr; J Caballería; I Martínez-Arranz; A Domínguez-Díez; C Alonso; J Muntané; M Pérez-Cormenzana; C García-Monzón; R Mayo; A Martín-Duce; M Romero-Gómez; O Lo Iacono; J Tordjman; R J Andrade; M Pérez-Carreras; Y Le Marchand-Brustel; A Tran; C Fernández-Escalante; E Arévalo; M García-Unzueta; K Clement; J Crespo; P Gual; M Gómez-Fleitas; M L Martínez-Chantar; A Castro; S C Lu; M Vázquez-Chantada; J M Mato Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Yuan Ji; Kendra K S Nordgren; Yubo Chai; Scott J Hebbring; Gregory D Jenkins; Ryan P Abo; Yi Peng; Linda L Pelleymounter; Irene Moon; Bruce W Eckloff; Xiaoshan Chai; Jianping Zhang; Brooke L Fridley; Vivien C Yee; Eric D Wieben; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Cyrielle Caussy; Veeral H Ajmera; Puneet Puri; Cynthia Li-Shin Hsu; Shirin Bassirian; Mania Mgdsyan; Seema Singh; Claire Faulkner; Mark A Valasek; Emily Rizo; Lisa Richards; David A Brenner; Claude B Sirlin; Arun J Sanyal; Rohit Loomba Journal: Gut Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Sungwoo Choi; Bingning Dong; Chih-Chun Janet Lin; Mi Jeong Heo; Kang Ho Kim; Zhen Sun; Martin Wagner; Nagireddy Putluri; Jae Myoung Suh; Meng C Wang; David D Moore Journal: Hepatology Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Alexander Tyshkovskiy; Perinur Bozaykut; Anastasia A Borodinova; Maxim V Gerashchenko; Gene P Ables; Michael Garratt; Philipp Khaitovich; Clary B Clish; Richard A Miller; Vadim N Gladyshev Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Gaurav V Sarode; Kyoungmi Kim; Dorothy A Kieffer; Noreene M Shibata; Tomas Litwin; Anna Czlonkowska; Valentina Medici Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Bruno Ramos-Molina; Daniel Castellano-Castillo; Oscar Pastor; Luis Ocaña-Wilhelmi; Diego Fernández-García; Manuel Romero-Gómez; Fernando Cardona; Francisco J Tinahones Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mari Saif; Wilhelmus J Kwanten; Jessica A Carr; Ivy X Chen; Jessica M Posada; Amitabh Srivastava; Juanye Zhang; Yi Zheng; Matthias Pinter; Sampurna Chatterjee; Samir Softic; C Ronald Kahn; Klaus van Leyen; Oliver T Bruns; Rakesh K Jain; Moungi G Bawendi Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Tagreed A Mazi; Kamil Borkowski; John W Newman; Oliver Fiehn; Christopher L Bowlus; Souvik Sarkar; Karen Matsukuma; Mohamed R Ali; Dorothy A Kieffer; Yu-Jui Y Wan; Kimber L Stanhope; Peter J Havel; Valentina Medici Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 7.376