Literature DB >> 28130611

A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.

G Gennaro1, A Ballaminut2, G Contento2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to illustrate a multiparametric automatic method for monitoring long-term reproducibility of digital mammography systems, and its application on a large scale.
METHODS: Twenty-five digital mammography systems employed within a regional screening programme were controlled weekly using the same type of phantom, whose images were analysed by an automatic software tool. To assess system reproducibility levels, 15 image quality indices (IQIs) were extracted and compared with the corresponding indices previously determined by a baseline procedure. The coefficients of variation (COVs) of the IQIs were used to assess the overall variability.
RESULTS: A total of 2553 phantom images were collected from the 25 digital mammography systems from March 2013 to December 2014. Most of the systems showed excellent image quality reproducibility over the surveillance interval, with mean variability below 5%. Variability of each IQI was 5%, with the exception of one index associated with the smallest phantom objects (0.25 mm), which was below 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: The method applied for reproducibility tests-multi-detail phantoms, cloud automatic software tool to measure multiple image quality indices and statistical process control-was proven to be effective and applicable on a large scale and to any type of digital mammography system. KEY POINTS: • Reproducibility of mammography image quality should be monitored by appropriate quality controls. • Use of automatic software tools allows image quality evaluation by multiple indices. • System reproducibility can be assessed comparing current index value with baseline data. • Overall system reproducibility of modern digital mammography systems is excellent. • The method proposed and applied is cost-effective and easily scalable.

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Mammography; Quality control; Reproducibility; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28130611     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4735-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?

Authors:  Walter Huda; Anthony M Sajewicz; Kent M Ogden; Ernest M Scalzetti; David R Dance
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.

Authors:  A Pascoal; C P Lawinski; I Honey; P Blake
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe; Aili K Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley; Etta D Pisano; R Edward Hendrick; Laurie L Fajardo; John M Boone; Kalpana Kanal; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Richard C Fleischman; Joseph Och; Mark B Williams; Daniel J Beideck; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.

Authors:  Aili K Bloomquist; Martin J Yaffe; Etta D Pisano; R Edward Hendrick; Gordon E Mawdsley; Stewart Bright; Sam Z Shen; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Edward L Nickoloff; Richard C Fleischman; Mark B Williams; Andrew D A Maidment; Daniel J Beideck; Joseph Och; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Computerized quantitative evaluation of mammographic accreditation phantom images.

Authors:  Yongbum Lee; Du-Yih Tsai; Norimitsu Shinohara
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.

Authors:  K W Brooks; J H Trueblood; K J Kearfott; D T Lawton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme.

Authors:  P Looney; M D Halling-Brown; J M Oduko; K C Young
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammography.

Authors:  Hugo de las Heras; Felix Schöfer; Britta Tiller; Margarita Chevalier; Georg Zwettler; Friedrich Semturs
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.