Literature DB >> 16878576

Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.

Martin J Yaffe1, Aili K Bloomquist, Gordon E Mawdsley, Etta D Pisano, R Edward Hendrick, Laurie L Fajardo, John M Boone, Kalpana Kanal, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Richard C Fleischman, Joseph Och, Mark B Williams, Daniel J Beideck, Andrew D A Maidment.   

Abstract

The Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), conducted under the auspices of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), is a clinical trial designed to compare the accuracy of digital versus screen-film mammography in a screening population [E. Pisano et al., ACRIN 6652-Digital vs. Screen-Film Mammography, ACRIN (2001)]. Part I of this work described the Quality Control program developed to ensure consistency and optimal operation of the digital equipment. For many of the tests, there were no failures during the 24 months imaging was performed in DMIST. When systems failed, they generally did so suddenly rather than through gradual deterioration of performance. In this part, the utility and effectiveness of those tests are considered. This suggests that after verification of proper operation, routine extensive testing would be of minimal value. A recommended set of tests is presented including additional and improved tests, which we believe meet the intent and spirit of the Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations to ensure that full-field digital mammography systems are functioning correctly, and consistently producing mammograms of excellent image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16878576     DOI: 10.1118/1.2164067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

Review 1.  Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.

Authors:  Andrea Nitrosi; Marco Bertolini; Giovanni Borasi; Andrea Botti; Adriana Barani; Stefano Rivetti; Luisa Pierotti
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.

Authors:  G Gennaro; A Ballaminut; G Contento
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Breast screen new South wales generally demonstrates good radiologic viewing conditions.

Authors:  BaoLin Pauline Soh; Warwick Lee; Jennifer L Diffey; Mark F McEntee; Peter L Kench; Warren M Reed; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Research in digital mammography and tomosynthesis at the University of Toronto.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 5.  Update on new technologies in digital mammography.

Authors:  Stephanie K Patterson; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.