| Literature DB >> 28129775 |
Jiahui Si1, Panpan Zhang1, Dan Tian1, Xing Wang1, Yuanyuan Ma1, Jianzhi Zhang1, Lu Wang2, Yue Yang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considering neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgery could shrink and reduce the primary tumor and distant micro-metastases to reduce the high relapses rates, NAC has been an accepted therapeutic management for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CMTM1_v17 is highly expressed in human testis tissues and solid tumor tissues but relatively low expression was obtained in the corresponding normal tissues. This study aims to investigate the significance of CMTM1_v17 in NSCLC and its association with platinum-based NAC efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: CMTM1_v17; Chemoresistance; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28129775 PMCID: PMC5273821 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-1094-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Patient characteristics enrolled in this study (n = 31)
| Variable | Number | Percentage(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 31 | 100 |
| Age (years) | ||
| ≤ 55 | 16 | 51.7 |
| > 55 | 15 | 48.4 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 25 | 80.6 |
| Female | 6 | 19.4 |
| Smoking | ||
| Non-smoker | 8 | 25.8 |
| Smoker | 23 | 74.2 |
| Histology | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 11 | 35.5 |
| Non-adenocarcinoma | 20 | 64.5 |
| Histologic grading | ||
| Poorly | 16 | 51.6 |
| Moderate and well | 15 | 48.4 |
| Venous invasion | ||
| Negative | 23 | 74.2 |
| Positive | 8 | 25.8 |
| Pathological stage | ||
| I/II | 17 | 54.8 |
| III | 14 | 45.2 |
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical staining for CMTM1_v17. a, b The low expression of CMTM1_v17 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary tumor; (c, d) The high expression of CMTM1_v17 in NSCLC primary tumor; the magnification was ×200
Patients’ characteristics and levels of CMTM1_v17 expression pre- and post-NAC (n = 31)
| Variable | Pre-NAC | Post-NAC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMTM1_v17 expression no. (%) |
| CMTM1_v17 expression no. (%) |
| |||
| High | Low | High | Low | |||
| Age | 0.200 | 0.552 | ||||
| ≤ 55 | 7(43.8) | 9(56.3) | 7(43.8) | 9(56.2) | ||
| > 55 | 10(66.7) | 5(33.3) | 5(33.3) | 10(66.7) | ||
| Gender | 0.763 | 0.791 | ||||
| Male | 10(40.0) | 15(60.0) | 14(56.0) | 11(44.0) | ||
| Female | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) | 3(50.0) | 3(50.0) | ||
| Smoking history | 0.935 | 0.75 | ||||
| Non-smoker | 3(37.5) | 5(62.5) | 4(50.0) | 4(50.0) | ||
| Smoker | 9(39.1) | 14(60.9) | 13(56.5) | 10(43.5) | ||
| Histology | 0.332 | 0.981 | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 3(27.3) | 8(72.7) | 6(54.5) | 5(45.5) | ||
| Non-adenocarcinoma | 9(45.0) | 11(55.0) | 11(55.0) | 9(45.0) | ||
| Histologic grading | 0.379 | 0.576 | ||||
| Poorly | 5(31.3) | 11(68.7) | 8(50.0) | 8(50.0) | ||
| Moderate and well | 7(46.7) | 8(53.3) | 9(60.0) | 6(40.0) | ||
| Venous invasion | 0.355 | 0.75 | ||||
| Negative | 10(43.5) | 13(56.5) | 13(56.5) | 10(43.5) | ||
| Positive | 2(25.0) | 6(75.0) | 4(50.0) | 4(50.0) | ||
| Pathological stage | 0.756 | 0.092 | ||||
| I/II | 7(41.2) | 10(58.8) | 7(41.2) | 10(58.8) | ||
| III | 5(35.7) | 9(64.3) | 10(71.4) | 4(28.6) | ||
P value was calculated using Pearson’s χ2 test
NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Fig. 2Chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis analysis according to CMTM1_v17 expression pre- and post-chemotherapy in 31 patients. a At the end of NAC, patients with low expression of CMTM1_v17 were sensitive to chemotherapy, with high PR rates compared to those who were CMTM1_v17 high expression (P = 0.008). b Before NAC, there was no significant difference in chemotherapy efficacy in CMTM1_v17 high vs CMTM1_v17 low groups (P = 0.788). These Kaplan-Meier curves illustrate the prognostic significance of CMTM1_v17 pre- and post-NAC in 31 NSCLC patients. c, d At the end of NAC, patients with low expression of CMTM1_v17 had much better prognosis compared to those who were CMTM1_v17 high expression. e, f Before NAC, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS in CMTM1_v17 high vs CMTM1_v17 low groups. OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for OS and DFS in patients with NSCLC (n = 31)
| Variables | OS | DFS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI |
| HR | 95%CI |
| |
| Age | ||||||
| ≤ 55 vs > 55 | 0.3624 | 0.1117–1.175 | 0.0908 | 0.3255 | 0.1182–0.8964 |
|
| Gender | ||||||
| Male vs female | 0.7042 | 0.1642–3.020 | 0.6368 | 0.4944 | 0.1269–1.927 | 0.3101 |
| Smoking | ||||||
| Non-smoker vs smoker | 1.698 | 0.4399–6.552 | 0.4423 | 1.672 | 0.5113–5.469 | 0.395 |
| Histology | ||||||
| AD vs non-AD | 0.9252 | 0.2659–3.219 | 0.9027 | 0.4909 | 0.1660–1.452 | 0.1985 |
| Histologic grading | ||||||
| Poorly | 2.005 | 0.6213–6.473 | 0.2445 | 2.079 | 0.7724–5.595 | 0.1474 |
| Venous Invasion | ||||||
| Negative vs positive | 1.352 | 0.3956–4.619 | 0.6306 | 1.237 | 0.4191–3.653 | 0.6999 |
| Pathological stage | ||||||
| I/II vs III | 0.3045 | 0.09458–0.9802 |
| 0.3044 | 0.1083–0.8553 |
|
| Pre-NAC CMTM1_v17 | ||||||
| Low vs high | 0.3753 | 0.09230-1.526 | 0.1708 | 1.002 | 0.3533–2.842 | 0.9971 |
| Post-NAC CMTM1_v17 | ||||||
| High vs low | 0.1587 | 0.04462–0.5647 |
| 0.3099 | 0.1149–0.8360 |
|
P value was calculated using a two-sided log-rank test.
AD adenocarcinoma, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR hazard ratio (log-rank), CI confidence interval.
Bold values are significant (p < 0.05)
Multivariable analysis of OS and DFS in patients received NAC (n = 31)
| Variable | OS | DFS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI |
| HR | 95%CI |
| |
| Post-NAC CMTM1_v17 | ||||||
| Low vs high | 0.074 | 0.008–0.670 |
| 0.455 | 0.136–1.517 | 0.12 |
| Pathological stage | ||||||
| I/II vs III | 0.295 | 0.082–1.049 | 0.059 | 0.319 | 0.107–0.951 |
|
| Age | ||||||
| ≤ 55 vs > 55 | 0.291 | 0.923–0.915 |
| |||
P value was calculated using a two-sided log-rank test.
OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, HR hazard ratio (log-rank), CI confidence interval.
Bold values are significant (P < 0.05)
Patient’s characteristic, overall and according to the time of enrollment
| Variable | Overall | Original patients group | Added patients group |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| no. (%) | no. (%) | no. (%) | ||
| Total | 78(100%) | 31(39.7%) | 47(60.3%) | |
| Age | 0.246 | |||
| ≤ 55 | 32(41.1%) | 16(50.0%) | 16(50.0%) | |
| > 55 | 46(58.9%) | 15(32.6%) | 31(67.4%) | |
| Gender | 0.793 | |||
| Male | 64(82.1%) | 25(39.1%) | 39(60.9%) | |
| Female | 14(17.8%) | 6(42.9%) | 8(57.1%) | |
| Smoking history | 0.978 | |||
| Non-smoker | 20(25.6%) | 8(40.0%) | 12(60.0%) | |
| Smoker | 58(74.4%) | 23(39.7%) | 35(60.3%) | |
| Histology | 0.661 | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 30(38.5%) | 11(36.7%) | 19(63.3%) | |
| Non-adenocarcinoma | 48(61.5%) | 20(41.7%) | 28(58.3%) | |
| Histologic grading | 0.549 | |||
| Poorly | 37(47.4%) | 16(43.2%) | 21(56.8%) | |
| Moderate and well | 41(52.6%) | 15(36.6%) | 26(63.4%) | |
| Venous invasion | 0.347 | |||
| Negative | 62(79.5%) | 23(37.1%) | 39(62.9%) | |
| Positive | 16(20.5%) | 8(50.0%) | 8(50.0%) | |
| Pathological stage | 0.744 | |||
| I/II | 41(52.6%) | 17(41.5%) | 24(58.5%) | |
| III | 37(47.4%) | 14(37.8%) | 23(62.2%) |
P value was calculated using Pearson’s χ2 test
Fig. 3Chemotherapy efficacy and prognostic significance of CMTM1_v17 expression in patients with NAC treatment. a PR rates were higher in patients with CMTM1_v17 low expression than those with CMTM1_v17 high expression. b, c Patients with low expression of CMTM1_v17 had significantly better DFS and OS compared to those with high expression of CMTM1_v17 after NAC. NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PR partial response; OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival
Patients’ characteristics and levels of CMTM1_v17 expression in patients received NAC (n = 78)
| Variable | CMTM1_v17 expression no. (%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | ||
| Age | 0.315 | ||
| ≤ 55 | 13(40.6) | 19(59.4) | |
| > 55 | 22(47.8) | 24(52.2) | |
| Gender | 0.308 | ||
| Male | 27(42.2) | 37(57.8) | |
| Female | 8(57.1) | 6(42.9) | |
| Smoking history | 0.593 | ||
| Non-smoker | 10(50.0) | 10(50.0) | |
| Smoker | 25(43.1) | 33(56.9) | |
| Histology | 0.352 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 13(43.3) | 17(56.7) | |
| Non-adenocarcinoma | 22(45.8) | 26(54.2) | |
| Histologic grading | 0.465 | ||
| Poorly | 15(40.5) | 22(59.5) | |
| Moderate and well | 20(48.8) | 21(51.2) | |
| Venous invasion | 0.506 | ||
| Negative | 29(46.8) | 33(53.2) | |
| Positive | 6(37.5) | 10(62.5) | |
| Pathological stage | 0.856 | ||
| I/II | 18(43.9) | 23(56.1) | |
| III | 17(45.9) | 20(54.1) | |
P value was calculated using Pearson’s χ2 test.
NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for OS and DFS in patients received NAC (n = 78)
| Variables | OS | DFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95% CI) |
| HR(95% CI) |
| |
| Age | 0.7963(0.3753–1.689) | 0.5528 | 0.6167(0.3178–1.197) | 0.1531 |
| Gender | 0.5719(0.2129–1.536) | 0.2678 | 0.3019(0.1163–0.7836) |
|
| Smoking history | 1.648(0.7097–3.827) | 0.2452 | 2.134(0.976–4.663) | 0.0575 |
| Histology | 0.4711(0.2217–1.001) | 0.0503 | 0.351(0.1761–0.6996) |
|
| Histologic grading | 1.425(0.6849–2.964) | 0.3435 | 1.714(0.8874–3.312) | 0.1086 |
| Venous invasion | 0.6148(0.2552–1.482) | 0.2784 | 0.7369(0.3251–1.670) | 0.4645 |
| Pathological stage | 0.3958(0.1894–0.8274) |
| 0.3351(0.1717–0.6540) |
|
| CMTM1_v17 expression | 0.3095(0.1442–0.6643) |
| 0.3655(0.1871–0.7142) |
|
P value was calculated using a two-sided log-rank test
NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR hazard ratio (log-rank), CI confidence interval.
Bold values are significant (P < 0.05)
Multivariable analysis of OS and DFS in patients received NAC (n = 78)
| Variable | OS | DFS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI |
| HR | 95%CI |
| |
| CMTM1_v17 | ||||||
| High vs low | 3.642 | 1.594–8.324 |
| 3.094 | 1.507–6.350 |
|
| Pathological stage | ||||||
| III vs I/II | 2.862 | 1.316–6.224 |
| 2.704 | 1.315–5.560 |
|
| Gender | ||||||
| Male vs female | 1.026 | 0.399–2.636 | 0.958 | |||
| Histology | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma vs non-Adenocarcinoma | 2.038 | 0.879–4.727 | 0.097 | |||
P value was calculated using a two-sided log-rank test
OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, HR hazard ratio (log-rank), CI confidence interval.
Bold values are significant (P < 0.05)