| Literature DB >> 28129768 |
Robin H Shutt1, Lisa Marie Kauri2, Scott Weichenthal3, Premkumari Kumarathasan4, Renaud Vincent5, Errol M Thomson5, Ling Liu2, Mamun Mahmud2, Sabit Cakmak2, Robert Dales2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown that as ambient air pollution (AP) increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality also increases. The mechanisms of this effect may be linked to alterations in autonomic nervous system function. We wished to examine the effects of industrial AP on heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of subtle changes in heart rate and rhythm representing autonomic input to the heart.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Environment; Epidemiology; Heart rate variability; Industrial air pollution; Steel production
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28129768 PMCID: PMC5273798 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-016-0206-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Participant demographics
| Mean | SD | |
| Age (years) | 24.2 | 5.8 |
| Height (cm) | 173.1 | 9.9 |
| Weight (kg) | 78.7 | 20.2 |
| BMI | 26.1 | 5.8 |
| Percentage | N | |
| Sex, Male | 46.0 | 28 |
More detailed descriptions of the participant population can be found in Dales et al., 2013. Age in years, height in centimetres, weight in kilograms and Body Mass Index (BMI) are presented as the mean for the 60 participants included in the analysis, with the standard deviation in the second column. 28 participants (46%) were male
Fig. 1Heart Rate and Time Domain of Heart Rate Variability differed significantly at the Plant site when compared to the College site. Data are expressed as the mean of responses measured from the afternoon ambulatory ECG recording time point. Error bars represent the 5 and 95% confidence limits. Mixed effects linear regressions showed that the increase in heart rate at the Plant Site, when compared to the College Site was significant (* = p < 0.05). The decreases in SDNN and pNN50 at the Plant Site, when compared to the College Site also were significant
Fig. 2Low Frequency Power was significantly reduced at the Plant site. Data are expressed as the mean of responses measured from the afternoon ambulatory ECG recording time point. Error bars represent the 5 and 95% confidence limits. Mixed effects linear regression determined that LF power was significantly reduced (* = p < 0.05) at the college site when compared to the plant site, while HF power and the LF/HF ratio did not differ significantly
Comparison of ambient AP levels measured at the college and Bayview Sites
| College site | Bayview site | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant | Mean (SD) | IQR | Mean(SD) | IQR |
| CO (ppm) | 0.42 (0.11) | 0.20 | 1.24 (1.63)* | 0.60 |
| NO (ppb) | 1.69 (1.2) | 1.30 | 7.02 (4.16)* | 4.90 |
| NO2 (ppb) | 4.6 (2.8) | 2.90 | 6.89 (3.64)* | 4.60 |
| NOx (ppb) | 6.29 (3.66) | 2.95 | 13.74 (6.97)* | 8.70 |
| O3 (ppb) | 32.44 (7.62) | 8.90 | 29.66 (6.53)* | 9.90 |
| SO2 (ppb) | 1.78 (2.56) | 1.60 | 8.05 (10.58)* | 14.20 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 11.67 (6.61) | 8.20 | 13.01 (6.87)* | 9.90 |
| UFP (particles/cm3) | 6960 (4261) | 5560 | 14654 (13664)* | 19648 |
Mean values are the mean for the participant specific exposure averaged over the hours of the five days that each individual participant spent breathing ambient air at the specified site. Pollutant levels were significantly different between the College and Bayview sites (* = p < 0.05)
Mean temperature at College 23.4 °C (SD 4.1 °C); mean relative humidity 56.0% (SD 15.1%)
Mean temperature at Bayview 23.4 °C (SD 4.1 °C); mean relative humidity 55.9% (SD 14.3%)
Associations between IQR increases in levels of individual pollutants and components of heart rate variability
| Frequency domain | Time domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant | Pollutant IQR | Heart Rate (bpm) | HF Power (ms2) | LF Power (ms2) | HF/LF | SDNN | RMSSD | pNN50 |
| CO (ppm) | 0.30 | 0.32* | -0.39 | -3.78* | -0.03 | -1.09* | -0.99 | -0.38 |
| NO (ppb) | 4.40 | 1.22* | -0.56 | -1.51* | -0.09 | -4.67* | -4.13 | -1.77* |
| NO2 (ppb) | 4.30 | 1.40* | -1.101 | -1.33 | -0.19 | -6.41* | -6.02* | -1.17 |
| NOx (ppb) | 8.30 | 1.50* | -0.38 | -1.46 | -0.12 | -6.60* | -6.01* | -1.41 |
| O3 (ppb) | 8.70 | 0.30 | -2.50* | -2.24 | -0.32* | -5.59 | -6.11 | 1.28 |
| SO2 (ppb) | 4.60 | 0.78* | -0.82 | -1.07* | -0.11 | -4.08* | -3.41 | -1.08 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 9.00 | 0.97 | -2.43* | -1.88* | -0.16 | -5.34 * | -5.28* | -1.99* |
| UFP (particles/cm3) | 12236 | 1.10* | -1.89 | -1.61* | -0.15 | -7.13* | -5.03 | -2.20* |
IQR values for participant specific pollutant exposures, combined for both the Bayview and College sites, are shown in the second column. The amplitude of the change in each HRV parameter associated with an IQR increase in pollutant level and 95% CI (bracketed) are reported for each pollutant/HRV parameter pair. Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) are denoted by *
* = p < 0.05. Mean temperature throughout the study was 23.4 °C (SD 4.1 °C); mean relative humidity was 56.0% (SD 14.7%)