Literature DB >> 28129707

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the microbiological diagnostic routine laboratory: a review.

Hagen Frickmann1, Andreas Erich Zautner2, Annette Moter3, Judith Kikhney3, Ralf Matthias Hagen1, Henrik Stender4, Sven Poppert5.   

Abstract

Early identification of microbial pathogens is essential for rational and conservative antibiotic use especially in the case of known regional resistance patterns. Here, we describe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as one of the rapid methods for easy identification of microbial pathogens, and its advantages and disadvantages for the diagnosis of pathogens in human infections in the laboratory diagnostic routine. Binding of short fluorescence-labeled DNA or nucleic acid-mimicking PNA probes to ribosomes of infectious agents with consecutive analysis by fluorescence microscopy allows identification of bacterial and eukaryotic pathogens at genus or species level. FISH analysis leads to immediate differentiation of infectious agents without delay due to the need for microbial culture. As a microscopic technique, FISH has the unique potential to provide information about spatial resolution, morphology and identification of key pathogens in mixed species samples. On-going automation and commercialization of the FISH procedure has led to significant shortening of the time-to-result and increased test reliability. FISH is a useful tool for the rapid initial identification of microbial pathogens, even from primary materials. Among the rapidly developing alternative techniques, FISH serves as a bridging technology between microscopy, microbial culture, biochemical identification and molecular diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorescence in situ hybridization; rapid diagnostics of infectious diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28129707     DOI: 10.3109/1040841X.2016.1169990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol        ISSN: 1040-841X            Impact factor:   7.624


  49 in total

1.  Bioinformatic Tools and Guidelines for the Design of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes.

Authors:  Helena Teixeira; Ana L Sousa; Andreia S Azevedo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  FISH Variants.

Authors:  Nuno M Guimarães; Nuno F Azevedo; Carina Almeida
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  An Introduction to Fluorescence in situ Hybridization in Microorganisms.

Authors:  Carina Almeida; Nuno F Azevedo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in species-specific diagnosis of ovine Campylobacter abortions.

Authors:  Godelind A Wolf-Jäckel; Mette Boye; Øystein Angen; Matthias Müller; Tim K Jensen
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 1.279

5.  Quality Control in Diagnostic Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Microbiology.

Authors:  Judith Kikhney; Annette Moter
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Optimizing peptide nucleic acid probes for hybridization-based detection and identification of bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Kathleen E Mach; Aniruddha M Kaushik; Kuangwen Hsieh; Pak Kin Wong; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 7.  A 'culture' shift: Application of molecular techniques for diagnosing polymicrobial infections.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Anne Hu; Nadya Andini; Samuel Yang
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 8.  Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: current diagnostic methodologies and a new molecular approach.

Authors:  S Moura; L Cerqueira; A Almeida
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Bacterial infiltration and bioprosthetic valve failure: Emerging diagnostics for emerging therapies.

Authors:  Alexander P Kossar; Isaac George; Rachel Gordon; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization can be used as a complementary assay for the diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infection.

Authors:  Elsa Prudent; Guillaume Le Guenno; Stijn Jonckheere; Anne Vankeerberghen; Hubert Lepidi; Emmanouil Angelakis; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.